Well we dont make the shots anyway so i don't think so.
Why not just have a person review all three-point shots to make sure they're accurate throughout the entire game? Someone can easily double check whether a shot is a three pointer or not, and if video replay doesn't show a good enough angle, then the call on the court remains. When it's something like determining whether a shot should be two points or three points, I think it would be easy to implement a "video double check" for something that generally can be determined by a video replay.
I'd be down with that jamstone.
I'll agree that the NBA is easily the worst refereed league in the US at least. The refs have so much leeway to shape the outcomes of key situations as they see fit.
This is a pretty big step to take for something that happens so rarely. How often to refs mess up and make a mistake on three-pointer calls late in games? Maybe like once a year in the entire playoffs combined? Probably less than that.
The only example I remember in all of the Spurs' championship runs was that time Boykins got screwed when they called his three-pointer a two. But the Spurs went on to win that game so it worked out well.
ing love it.
The refs are horrendous and their jobs should be given to ppl who aren't corrupt.
If it works, embrace it.
If it doesn't work, kill it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote