I don't have to.
The hundreds of thousands of scientists have already.
they just had a meeting in New York to all come to the agreement that global warming doesn't exist.
Naw, now you know who stuck it to you
I don't have to.
The hundreds of thousands of scientists have already.
they just had a meeting in New York to all come to the agreement that global warming doesn't exist.
Oh man your hits keep on coming you stupid . I was being sarcastic but obviously you being a self pompous ass blocks whatever sarcasm detection you have.
Now I just feel like doing what I said I was going to do out of spite.
Global warming is not a hoax.
We've had global warming since the Ice Age.
One more time because it makes me laugh....
what a ing moron
Global Warming is a Hoax
Go ahead and chew on that for a bit Reverend.
Are they the same guys that decide if there was really a holocaust?
Good stuff T.
Can i fall asleep with the TV on now?
Go for it.
Im leaving all 3 computers and all 3 TVs on.
That does it, I'm pulling the plug on my hubbies Oxygen tank![]()
Is there anyone on here that has actually bought carbon credits??
I got some. A whole bunch! What color paper do you want them on? I got red, green, yellow, and purple.
Only a $1 each.
Once you are done chewing on mass amounts of funnel cake and corn dogs, chew on this http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/.
Your Jesus hates gluttons.
You're such a brilliant writer that I missed your incredibly clever sarcasm. There are plenty of people who aren't sarcastic when they say what you said.
As for you, T Park, the guy who wrote that article is Tom Harris from the Natural Resources Stewardship Project, which is an energy industry lobby front. In other words, it has no credibility.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...rdship_Project
There are 68 "scientists", mostly ex-geologists turned energy lobbyists, who routinely dispute global warming theory. The same guys have been doing so for the last 20 years, irrespective of the mounting and now overwhelming evidence to prove that global warming is upon us and is a consequence of man's actions.
Try addressing the science and not the politics of the issue (forget Al Gore, he is just a bystander) and you'd find that actually global warming is not a hoax, that there are thousands of scientific articles stretching back 30 years that support it. However, I know you won't because you think you know better, even though you don't.
Anyway, I'll leave this thread adn all like it alone now. There is no point discussing the state of the environment with people because they always think they know more than you do even if it's your life and career. Do they do that to their doctor/lawyer/mechanic/etc etc? No. but, of course, everyone knows more about the environment than environmental scientists do.![]()
as opposed to guys like Al Gore who make millions off scaring people into this hoax?which is an energy industry lobby front. In other words, it has no credibility.
Sure thing.
Al Gore. He is a politician. I don't give a what Al Gore says or does.
Look at the science and talk to the scientists.
PSAl Gore makes millions, sure he does, and that pales into insignificance, as does the money made by all the scientists in the world, when compared with the money flowing through the fossil fuel industry.
Yeah the 300 scientists who met in New York last month to agree that Global Warming doesn't exist, convinced me.Look at the science and talk to the scientists
Saying it's a hoax is just ignorant. Do you really believe that years of burning oil and coal by millions of households and automobiles would have absolutely no effect on the environment? Thinking otherwise is just being close minded.
I understand that there are natural fluctuations in the natural weather cycles of the world, but to think that humans have no negative effect on the world is just ridiculous.
I thought there were hundreds of thousands? Now there are only 300?
Okay, Okay, so I will not take a dump in the woods, already
100,000's > 300
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6341451/
updated 7:10 a.m. CT, Wed., Oct. 27, 2004
IOWA CITY, Iowa - The Bush administration is trying to stifle scientific evidence of the dangers of global warming in an effort to keep the public uninformed, a NASA scientist said Tuesday night.
“In my more than three decades in government, I have never seen anything approaching the degree to which information flow from scientists to the public has been screened and controlled as it is now,” James Hansen told a University of Iowa audience.
Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Ins ute for Space Studies in New York and has twice briefed a task force headed by Vice President Cheney on global warming. He was also one of the first government scientists tasked with briefing congressional committees on the dangers of global warming, testifying as far back as the 1980s.
Hansen said the administration wants to hear only scientific results that “fit predetermined, inflexible positions.” Evidence that would raise concerns about the dangers of climate change is often dismissed as not being of sufficient interest to the public.
“This, I believe, is a recipe for environmental disaster.”
Hansen said the scientific community generally agrees that temperatures on Earth are rising because of the greenhouse effect — increased emissions of carbon dioxide and other materials into the atmosphere that trap heat. Most of that increase comes from burning fossil fuels.
These rising temperatures, scientists believe, could cause sea levels to rise and trigger severe environmental consequences, he said.
Hansen said such warnings are consistently suppressed, while studies that cast doubt on such interpretations receive favorable treatment from the administration.
He also said reports that outline potential dangers of global warming are edited to make the problem appear less serious. “This process is in direct opposition to the most fundamental precepts of science,” he said.
White House science adviser John H. Marburger III has denied charges that the administration refuses to accept the reality of climate change, noting that President Bush pointed out in a 2001 speech that greenhouse gases have increased substantially in the past 200 years.
The president has also said that while he believes warming is a serious problem, he doesn't feel the threat his imminent and has instead ordered more research. He has also sought voluntary steps by industry and pumped federal dollars into technology projects like capturing and sequestering carbon dioxide emissions.
Hansen said he was speaking as a private citizen, not as a government employee, and paid his own way for the Iowa appearance. He described himself as moderately conservative, but said he will vote for John Kerry in the presidential election.
“He certainly is not in denial of the existence of climate change problems,” Hansen said.
Doesn't ing matter. I could be the worst writer in the world but that doesn't excuse you jumping the gun. I'll be sure to use the blue sarcasm font color for you next time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)