Reply With Quote
Me too
Tim Duncan gest the MVP, if this happens:
1) Spurs, best record in West.
2) Duncan averages over 20 points per game.
3) Duncan averages over 10 rebounds per game.
4) Duncan averages over 2 blocks per game.
5) Duncan shoots 50% from the field.
6) Duncan leads Spurs in scoring.
Me too
Your basketball takes are as re ed as your 911 conspiracy theories.
This article represents the only reasonable thoughts to have ever come out of her simple mind.
He's a she.
who do you think is more valuable to their team than Duncan?
Do you understand that the Spurs have no shotblocking or rebounding without Duncan?
The Hornets may win the best seed but If Pau doesn't get hurt we don't go 5-4 in that stretch. We would then have the best record in the West by at least 2 games. Also, big Drew has been hurt for like 40 games already. The Hornets have been injury free all season and having CP3, Peja (allstar), West (allstar) and Chandler (defense) of course you're going to have a great season. , if the Spurs we're relatively healthy for the season they'd be top spot.
Once again I question why so many people give a about the regular season. It's all about the playoffs, this MVP nonsense. Kobe said himself that all he cares about is a ring.
This is the same stupid that said Kobe > Jordan. Disregard anything she ever says about anything.
Shaq is the most dominant center of all time?
Garnett should win. I also think its between Kobe and Chris P.
In his prime, yes. Over his entire career, no.
Kareem is the greatest center of all time IMHO.
that's nuts.
Wilt Chamberlain averaged 50 points and 27 rebounds per game in 1962.
Bill Russell had the most dominant game of all time, game 7 of the 1962 NBA Finals.
Russell scored 30 points and had 40 rebounds. That's right, 40 rebounds. The Celtics won the game.
Kareem took an expansion team to the NBA championship in his second season, sweeping through the playoffs 12-1, and 4-0 in the Finals, never even with a close game.
Hakeem won two NBA les with not a single all-star teammate either year.
Shaq's supposed dominant streak was 2000-2002. If you check the stats, you'll see that Tim Duncan played Shaq even score.
Shaq only won one MVP award in his career.
Shaq was really good against bad teams becaue could dominate near the basket.
But against a good playoff team, just keep him away from the basket and he no longer dominates
Last edited by Galileo; 04-04-2008 at 07:08 PM.
"Two-time MVP winner Tim Duncan should have gotten stronger consideration last season, too. But Duncan is the NBA's version of Russell Crowe. After Crowe won Best Actor for "Gladiator," the Academy overlooked him for both "The Insider" and "A "Beautiful Mind." Crowe won't win another one because he's too consistently good. Same goes for Duncan."
That hit the spot...
I was about to get in your ass about the Godfathers being in 72 and 74.
Same can be said for NOH. Without Paul making those guys better, what are the odds of them having a winning season?
Who the didn't expect anything from New Orleans? Most people around here knew they were going to be good if they could ever get healthy. I hate how MVP has somehow become a "best player on a team we in the media were too stupid to realize was going to be good" award.
Until you realized that my ass probably isn't a place anyone wants to be. Especially after P.F. Changs.
Her whole analogy is stupid. Al wouldn't have won over Marlon in what is one of the celebrated performances of all time and he certainly wouldn't of won for reprising a role. She's a ing idiot.
come on cp3!!!
Actually, I think she was dead on. For GF I, Pacino was up for supporting actor, and lost GF II to Art Carney (heeeeey, Ralph!). And Scent of a Woman sucked dead donkeys.
By Scent he had become a caricature of himself. If anyone should've won from 1972 it was Duvall. And don't on Carney. He was in Muppets Take Manhattan for s sake.
Duvall didn't have much to do in GF I. James Caan has a stronger case.
Neither did Pacino (in having to do too much). They were all scenery for Brando and his cotton balls.
Are you joking? Pacino had to morph from the idealistic, sensitive, innocent brother into the cold-blooded calculating murderous don. Plus he had the most screen time of any of them.
"Do you renounce Satan, Michael Corleone?"
Eh...Screen time shared with better actors. He got carried through a majority of the movie. At the end, he found his stride and followed it into Part 2. Every single actor and actress in that movie delivers the perfomance of a lifetime. Pacino could've been Don Knotts and been imortalized.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
