We have a comedian
1) Jordan is 6'5, Kobe is 6'6. I've seen both of them together in person as well and you can tell that Kobe is slightly taller.
http://www.askmen.com/men/november99...el_jordan.html
2) Kobe said in a recent article (this season) something about his 220 pounds, I forgot what article it was exactly. It was to the effect of his 220 pounds coming at someone, there's no stopping him. And then there's his profile
http://www.realgm.com/src_playerfile/155/kobe_bryant/
We have a comedian
You're still using the biggest players, not the average players in today's NBA. Shaq and Howard and Yao Ming are the biggest players in the league. An average NBA center is still about 6-11, 240 today.
You can go back to the 80s and pick a handful of big men that were big and thick. Look at Mark Eaton or Jack Sikma. Patrick Ewing for most of his NBA career had a playing weight of around 270. Hakeem, even though he was his somewhat slender still played around 250-260. Karl Malone at 260 even though he was only about 6-8. Charles Barkley at about 250 at 6-4. Kareem in his prime was probably around 270. Robert Parish around 250.
Shaq is a freakish anomaly no matter what era, just like Wilt. And, Shaq is not anywhere close to the average center in today's NBA. Yao is 7-6. For his height, 300 lbs is like 250 for a 7-footer. Dwight Howard is probably around 275. That's more than the average center back in the 80s but it's not that huge of a difference.
Today's NBA players are definitely stronger and lift more weight and look more muscular. But, the body mass is not nearly that huge of a difference you make it out to be.
Will Kobe add a ring this year? How about next year?
Just a guestimation. I think he has a fairly good chance of getting one this year and the next 3 years the Lakers should be unstoppable if they keep Pau, Kobe, Bynum, Odom.
Why would you reference a profile that probably doesn't update weight?
Reference this:
http://fitnessblackbook.com/fitness-...ng-nba-season/
October 23, 2007. Beginning of this season.
As for Kobe's height versus Jordan's height, that picture doesn't show much of a difference at all except for Kobe's afro. Show me a picture with both standing up straight as opposed to MJ leaning up against a wall and with Kobe without his afro. Their chins and shoulders are at almost identical height.
You're right about the profile, it's lame. Kobe has gotten his weight back over the course of the season. I'll go try to find that article where he says he's 220, I think it was an LATimes article.
As for the height, there was an ESPN/CNN article recently discussing the size of Jordan, Kobe and LeBron. The evolution described in the article is that each one is a bigger version of his predecessor.
I found an article, this is not the same one comparing Jordan, Kobe, LeBron but it also states the height
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...bayless/041217
-Kobe Bryant is a little more gifted athletically than Michael Jordan was.
Kobe is a much better pure shooter. Kobe has risen into Michael's rare air when it comes to making great late shots. Kobe is a little taller, and just as quick and strong. Kobe plays with as much nightly energy and passion as Michael did, even on defense.
A little taller? Ok, maybe. They're both about 6-6, so if we're talking about a fraction of an inch difference, I can buy it. I've also seen sites that say Kobe is 6'4 and 7/8" without shoes. Kobe was also listed at 6-8 when he first came into the league and played small forward when the Lakers when Eddie Jones was still the 2-guard. I'm just saying, if Kobe is taller than Jordan, it's marginal at best. We're talking about eighths of an inch difference.
And, just to be clear, you are also citing a Skip Bayless article that does not provide any legit reference itself as to the respective heights of each player.
" We have a winner ! "
![]()
Hahah, surprise, surprise. Great way to dodge the question![]()
Thks.
The Lakers will be just scary next season, with Gasol even more comfy in the Lakers' O and D, and with a healthy, improved Bynum
Disagree.
There's nothing revolutionary about defensive strategies in today's NBA. The only thing I think which has changed strategically is that a lot of teams forego opportunities for offensive rebounds to get back on transition defense. The zone's impact is really overrated because it's hardly ever used by teams. Only situationally to give different looks here and there.
Scoring is down, not because of great defense, but because of a myriad of other reasons:
1) Declining fundamentals and skill levels of players entering the NBA. A big reason for this was the massive influx of 18-19 yr olds coming either straight from High School or after a very short stint in college.
2) Michael Jordan/Sports Center: You've had a ton of guys more interested in many ways at making the highlight play, the big dunk or embarassing their opponent with a crazy crossover than doing the little things to win ball games.
3) Offensive style shift: Much less motion, player movement, and ball movement to free guys. Much more isolation. The bigs of today like Sheed, Jermaine O'Neal, Al Harrington, Nowitzki, KG, Webber (a few yrs ago) are more interested in proving their prowess at lower percentage 20-25 foot jumpers. Guys like Duncan and O'Neal are the only throwback era to the 80's/90's golden era of dominant post play with monsters like Moses, Kareem, Robinson, Olajuwon, Walton, Barkley, K. Malone, etc.
4) Lost arts: Outlet passing/midrange jumper. These were great offensive tools of the 80's/90's and now they are just gone.
Expansion has really diluted the game which is why scoring and FG% have gone down so much. Obviously if you have teams that dont move the ball well, dont move without the ball well, the result is an ugly product and I can see why it would lead to the initial conclusion that defense is simply better.
But let's remember it's not a coincidence that in the 80's/90's les were won for the most part by Larry Bird, Magic/Kareem, Michael Jordan, Hakeem. What these guys have in common is that they were all basically the best offensive players in the NBA at the time their teams won les. Simply put, great offense beats great defense everytime. The problem is that there isn't much truly great offense played in today's NBA, largely due to the aforementioned reasons IMO.
Although I should qualify this by saying I do think the NBA is finally catching up talentwise to the expansion. I think Stern's minimum age rule is helping and there's some really good young talent in today's NBA after a really dull period the past few years. The league is getting it's mojo back.
I agree that overall defense is better today. It's played with more intensity by better athletes. If you compare game films from the 80s to those today, you appreciate just how much harder people close on defense now and how many more open shots there were back then.
However, there is a contribution from the fact that shooting skills are worse today, especially the midrange game. I think people were able to hit reliably from more different spots on the court than now.
Also, I agree that the Pistons were really the forerunners of the defense being played today. They had guys athletes like Rodman and Salley with handchecking allowed. Before them, the Knicks were the paradigm of winning by defense, but Detroit brought it up to a whole new level.
There's no debate, kobe 0 dpoy, 0 mvps, how many defensive first team? 0?
KB in yrs the NBA allowed handchecking: 561 games - 21ppg 43% FG%
26.1% of KB's pts come from the FT line vs 21.6% for MJ & yet MJ has a "HIGHER" pts per FGA.
Ever notice KB's offense DRAMATICALLY improved "AFTER" they changed the rules?
KB in the last 3 yrs handchecking or lane violation was allowed (01-02, 02-03, 03-04): 227 games - 23ppg 43% FG%
KB "SINCE" the new anti-handchecking rule (not including 07-08): 223 games - 31ppg 46% FG%.
Kobe, from 2002-04 averaged 21.7 shot attempts vs 16.85 shot attempts for shaq
He shot MORE times than shaq & STILL couldn't outscore him!! That just PROVES how TRULY INEFFICIENT he is at scoring!
He's a VOLUME shooter/scorer. He takes TONS of shots, just to BE ABLE to score 20+ppg & post MEDIOCRE shooting %'s & he's DONE this his ENTIRE career!![]()
5 defensive first team selections for Kobe Bryant.
nvm they have to give him an award somewhere.
5 Defensive first teams, one of the best defenders in the NBA
0 MVPs, so far, at least 1 coming this year.....
0 DPOY, that's probably not going to change.
As for Kobe's shooting %, he got much better because he grew older and got better. Defenses back in MJ's days are not as good as today's defense. Double teams were much rarer then while Kobe sees a double everytime he touches the ball. In addition, Jordan's size and quickness was a rarity back then. Kobe's a better shooter than Jordan, almost everybody agrees on that.
Even right now people are discussing who is better but Kobe always loses because he only has 3 rings. It's all about the rings.
As is right now, Jordan has more rings so he's the greater player, but if Kobe gets more rings, I think history has a chance at being rewritten as to who the greater player was.
lol what a homer, defense back in the days on elite players like jordan was much more physical, or you have been living under a rock all those years. He's a greater player not because he has more rings, but the way he won it, fighting a flu, a pippen injury, and hitting one impossible jumper and layups after the other, i will bring this up again, kobe stats after stern change the rules to FAVOR guards like him 31 ppg on 46% shooting, a bulk of those points coming from free throws, the new ruling attributed to alot of those, and shaq winning all 3 finals mvp in the lakers 3 championship, kobe still anywhere near the level of jordan?![]()
Are you kidding me? This is why he was the greater player? Read up, the defense back then was only good and physical on a FEW teams, most teams played NORMAL basketball defense, not all this "Detroit Pistons Bad Boy" stuff...that was 1 team. Anytime you breathed on Jordan you got a foul.
Go look at the size of players back then, Jordan was a monster compared to most shooting guards of that era. Now a 6'6 shooting guard is normal.
You'll have to do better that or step away from the Haterade![]()
You breath on jordan and gets a foul? that would explain the free throw discrepencies between mj and kb, you are making little sense, those bad boys stuff were legally banned after jordan took them apart, you want to see good defense? look no further than the bulls, knicks, jazz, magic, houston of the 90s, any of those team could match up defensively with any team in the nba today, and there are allowed to go much tougher defensively, that was why olajuwon made shaq cried, stop living in the moment and own up to the truth, it's sad watching you try so hard to defend a lie.
Let's see here, you have Bulls, Knicks, Jazz, Magic, Houston.
That's 5 teams out of the whole NBA that played great defense and that makes the 90s such an awesome defensive period? oops... EPIC FAIL.
Are you just making stuff up for fun? Hahah, Jordan shot WAY more free throws than Kobe in his career. Go look it up, NBA.com is your friend. Yet another FAILYou breath on jordan and gets a foul? that would explain the free throw discrepencies between mj and kb, you are making little sense,
Take another drink of Haterade and Keep it coming![]()
utah jazz, chicago bulls, new york knicks, houston rockets, had any of those 5 teams been around during "shaq's" championship run kobe would remain ringless.
If kobe goes at a rate of shooting around 700 ft a season he will easily surpass jordan in ft, he is already ahead of jordan in free throws per game,
you know you got owned when you cant throw out any legit stats to back urself up.
Kobe just keeps getting better and better, and at his age he's in the prime of his career. To attribute his better stats to the elimination of handchecking as the predominant factor is correlation, not causation.
Uhm, yeah sure, free throws.
Kobe 12 seasons: 6703
Jordan 12 seasons: 7394
FAIL![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)