It's hard to imagine WHY the Spurs would be the most hated team unless one is viewing the ballclub purely from the standpoint of jealousy. Which is why the Jazz fan's thoughts should be considered the "low" that you cross out. My thoughts are likely the "high"--just a warning.
Spurs are consistant and very nearly always rise to the occassion post-season. That is what a solid team is supposed to do. Forget that Duncan plays boring technical b-ball, he gets the job done. And now players around him have risen to the point that Duncan can take some plays off. From a practical standpoint, that is a good thing.
Dependability, durability and cohesion are key if a team wants to win more than one championship (with most of the same players). Spurs fit that bill. Dependability may seem boring on it's face, but it gets the job done!
I heard that Bowen went scoreless during the first two games. How often can a starter go scoreless for the first two games post-season and continue to receive respect and awe from other teams? You don't even notice that Bowen doesn't score because he's so very valuable at the other end.
Spurs fans are knowledgable and classy, for the most part. Tim and Kori have expanded this forum for b-ball lovers of ALL teams, which says a lot for their sportsmanship. And they emulate the Spurs fan, I believe.
The small-market Spurs ARE likeable and, although I root against at times, they are the most deserving champs I've seen in my short existance as a b-ball fanatic.