Horry = Poland
West = USSR
I definitely don't like the fact that the crowd started chanting "Horry" when West was on the ground. But I don't think it was dirty in the least. He was setting a hard pick, deal with it.
Now kindly go off and go root for a team with a fan base more to your standards.
Take a ing hike.
whottt whottt whottt whottt whottt!!!!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Went to yahoo.com and this article is the main headline of the website....
Couldn't have said it better. NBA = No Babies Allowed.
I don't think the play on West by Horry was bad at all.
Here's why:
If you look at the clip you can see that Horry established his stance to set a pick before David West jumped in the air and subsequently fell on Horry's shoulder. Had D West just went straight into Horry without jumping in the air, which is what Horry rightly anticipated would happen, nothing would have happened. Horry was merely readying himself for impact by putting his shoulder out, which we see ALL the time. Unfortunately for West, he jumped in the air. And you can't blame Horry for that.
The crowd chanting "Horry" was embarrassing. I was actually really surprised by that. Full chicken ...and if anyone of you were involved, your a pussy.
On the other hand, what I don't understand is, Tony got hammered on a back pick by Tyson Chandler the previous game...in which Chandler got called for a foul. It was a clean play and Parker got hammered pretty good because he didn't know Chandler was there...how is this play any different? Chandler in fact shouldn't have even been called for a foul on the play, it was a clean hard pick that happened because no Spur called out to tell Tony and pick was coming. Something as basic as a playground reaction....
Jackass journalist with nothing to go with but assumptions.
And I think the fans were more backing up Horry than cheering for what resulted from the play. It's like the fans could sense that there'd bge all the es on NO's side who'd whine about it and call us and Horry dirty after the game, even though no one deserves it.
It was a perfectly fine pick by Horry and the fans could sense the storm of criticism that would come along with it. We were standing up for Horry. We did the right thing.
Go to sports.yahoo.com
Their front story is this article and Wojnarowski has the pic labeled "Horry helped the Spurs win by being dirty once, has he done it again?".
Here we go with the Suns series last year bull excuses again
Wow I wish I could write an entire article about a guy setting a screen for his teammate on offense, and how he somehow magically controlled David West's mind to jump right the back into him off a deflection.
You know what, reviewing the play, I think it was mainly Manu Ginobili's fault for not being a good sport and tell David West that Robert Horry was sitting right behind him, and for throwing the pass to begin with.
For shame...woe woe woe.
Okay the chanting of Horry when all he did was set a screen was in bad taste but lets face it there was no intentional harm invoked by setting a little itty bitty screen, he didn't even untuck his arms from his chest during it.
That's my thought, too. I can understand the call -- Horry didn't maintain his body plain in setting the screen, but then again, I'm not sure that Chandler did either with his screen in Game 5 (he certainly appeared to lean into Parker to emphasize the screen).
The Hornets' reaction -- and particularly Scott's -- is curious to me as well. When the Parker play happened, TNT cut to audio of Scott and Joe Derosa talking with Parker nearby and Scott telling Derosa that it shouldn't have been a foul and that Parker's teammates should have told him the screen was coming. Why isn't it the same thing with West? Is it just because he has a bad back? If so, that's nonsense.
Horry's screen was almost identical to Chandler's. If one was acceptable, the other has to be as well.
+1 exactly, i rather stand by a Spur player than with everyone else accusing him.
[/thread]
Desperate champions? The series was tied, last time I checked. Both teams have handed out double-digit losses. How does that make the Spurs desperate?
Tony back pedalled blindy into screen and BOUNCED forward, like West, flat prone and in pain.
Where's the press outcry?
Somewhere Bill Lambier and Rick Mahorn are chuckling.
I remember when the Spurs were called soft............Romey.
Tony forgot to milk the injury like West did. Guess that's the difference between being a media (West) and getting up like a real baller should(Parker).
A little consistency??? In the NBA???![]()
I'd rather everybody call the spurs mean and dirty than the soft tag they used to put on the spurs.
I love mean, I love dirty, please bring sum'more![]()
Talk about an incredibly biased article - this is it. If I didn't know anything about Horry I'd assume that he was one of the dirtiest players around. And the more I read the more it became apparent that this writer is not only biased against the Spurs but truely ignorant of who we are, and what it really takes to win a championship. I found it ironic that as he kept painting us as "desparate" and our tactics as "dubious" Scott was actually wanting his team to be just like the Spurs! We're the model and one of the greatest teams ever.And he was also reminiscing about the old days when THIS WAS HOW IT WAS PLAYED AND NO ONE WOULD HAVE THOUGHT ANY DIFFERENT. McHale's clothesline of Rambis is a flagarent 2 and automatic suspension today. Back then it was "just two free throws"??!!
![]()
So let me get this straight. Your article implies that the Spurs use desparate and dirty tactics in order to stave off elimination while the opposing coach is trying to mold his team in the their image?
And your point is?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)