Reply With Quote
actually that record is pretty close to being right.You got the wrong record in back to back games
Sequ,
who should the Spurs go get???
Come on, you have yet to answer the question for 3 months.
Fatigue could be blamed too.Despite hitting FTs all night, Duncan and others missed some key ones down stretch
Duncan prob didnt have his legs.
78 minutes in 3 days is rough for any age.
actually that record is pretty close to being right.You got the wrong record in back to back games
Sequ,
who should the Spurs go get???
Come on, you have yet to answer the question for 3 months.
Including tonight's game, the Spurs are 9-3 on the front of back to backs and 8-4 on the back of back to backs.
Last time I checked the record, we had 2 losses in that column, and that was when the season was barely underway....since then, I've noticed the back to back games, and I know when we lose.
The record is not right.
I correct myself, just checked, 3 is correct, still you weren't right, so you make better statements Whott..
Furthermore, that's 3 of 10 losses..
That has to mean something.
Now stfu Whott.
lol.
8-4 on back to backs is pretty damn good jabroni get a clue.
Courtside? Its official. Lola kicked to the curb.
8-3, the only losses are to Memphis, Houston and tonight. And all 3 losses came when playing our third game in 4 nights.
What's the 4th loss? I got Memphis, Houston and tonight.
Sense... go to spurs.com and pull up da fukkin schedule and do the math. That's a stupid argument.
Spurs have the best record in da league. WGAF anyway? Ain't won today or tomorrow, its all about the playoffs.
Besides, whats up with Parker and Eva? Does dude want to move to California?
Are you serious?
First of all, it's 9-3.
And we lost to inferior teams. Even if it was on back to backs, it should've been easy....
Yes, it should've even if it was on the road.
Portland are 9 games under .500, and 19 games behind the Spurs. Even if they played out of their minds tonight, shooting 56% vs their avg 44%, this loss really hurts.
My only compensation is that it wasn't the Spurs playing crappier than the other team's crap. Shooting 56% ain't crap shooting.
On back to back to backs.
Can you read?
How was I wrong?
I think I am right...we are 8-3. And I don't really care what our record is in the first game since that has nothing to do with the problems of it being a back to back. It's the second game that is the problem.
Furthemore...why don't you look at the records of other teams in that situation and see if you still think it's a problem.
You are slow, and I did check, and I corrected myself.
Now shut up.
your being unrealstic.
A team like this, as good as they are, are gonna have offnights.
They are gonna let down, and they are gonna be tired.
Especially after playing game 4rty freakin 4 in January.
You claim 8-2.
And considering how good this team is, it should be a problem...screw the rest of the teams, all the teams except for Sonics and Suns aren't at the Spurs' caliber.
And the Sonics and Suns aren't used to winning, so it's bad....we should be cruising.
Consider it.
Moron.
We have a bench that loves to contribute....and it appears that today they weren't used much, or atleast appreciated by Pop..
The Spurs' bench can beat a poor team, even like portland...
and it appears that today they weren't used much, or atleast appreciated by Pop..
wtf. the bench practically played the whole game.
What game were you watching????
They lost to Houston twice on the back of back to backs.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
What's the 4th loss? I got Memphis, Houston and tonight.
I didn't see a practically mature Beno in there...
And yeah, the bench played the whole game, but only Brown was a good contributor on it.
The rest of the bench was low scoring, and to those who scored...you can say they weren't contributors.
Used at wrong times....and also making TO's
I claimed ing 8-3. Which we were before this loss anyway. Again it is probably the best record in the NBA in that situation.
So STFU and stop ing about excellence.
He was the one missing open threes in the 4th.didn't see a practically mature Beno in there...
lol.Used at wrong times
Whatever.
How were they "wrongly used"
Sense, you make no sense. You just said the bench wasn't used much. Now you are saying they played the whole game and just didn't contribute. Which is it?And yeah, the bench played the whole game, but only Brown was a good contributor on it.
We also have injuries to two of our best players. And a bench that has been ridden.
Don't you have horse you should be riding to death or something...that seems to be your style.The Spurs' bench can beat a poor team, even like portland...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
