Actually, it's less than half...he has a 52-53% approval rating at the moment."So is half the country."
Oh so it's fine when a Kerry fundraiser suddenly decides to change his mind and make a claim against Bush but when one of the 250 Swift Vets is found to be a Bush/Cheney volunteer well that's a major problem.
Actually, it's less than half...he has a 52-53% approval rating at the moment."So is half the country."
Well withing the MOE.j/k
Anybody know the record for thread length in here?
I still have the kidd thread on my HD somewhere. This was definetely faster.
Well, c'mon, let's keep it going...say something asinine, DeSPURate.
This girl is freaking ugly:
![]()
I said asinine, not stupid.
Look, if Kerry wants any hope of winning this election he will get the word to the DNC and the 527s to stop the National Guard bull . By harping on that crap you give the Swift Vets pretty of reason to still be in the fore, you confirm the perception that the Democrats are all about hating the president personally, and it confirms the perception that they don't have much else to talk about. Also, you crowd out the ability of Kerry to land any real criticism on the Bush administration in the national media cycles. As we can see not a lot of people think the National Guard issue matters. It's not because it hasn't been presented correctly. It's because people have already made up their mind about Bush. The criticism about how he got in the Guard has been levelled at him in 2000 and earlier this year. The same goes for the notion that he missed a physical or whatever. The vast majority of voters do not care.
This campaign is so ed up as has been pointed out before in here.
Hey, but it's entertaining.
Damn, did Karl Rove develop some kind of evil mind control technique which he is using on the Democrat party? He couldn't have asked for a better scenario in this election.
A Perfect Storm.
I really wouldn't be surprised if Bush took every Electoral Vote but D.C.'s
www.nytimes.com/2004/09/1...&position=
Indeed.Asked what role Mr. Burkett had in raising questions about Mr. Bush’s military service, Mr. Van Os said: “If, hypothetically, Bill Burkett or anyone else, any other individual, had prepared or had typed on a word processor as some of the journalists are presuming, without much evidence, if someone in the year 2004 had prepared on a word processor replicas of do ents that they believed had existed in 1972 or 1973 - which Bill Burkett has absolutely not done” - then, he continued, “what difference would it make?”
Wouldn't a "none" have been sufficient?
Unless, of course, that would have been disingenuous.
Uh, it's a crime to forge government do ents.“what difference would it make?”
It doesn't make a difference to the argument at hand. You can't take a quote and construe it to mean he is reffering to an anticedant to which he clearly was not.
But, if his hypothetical is true, it does make a difference...it suggests a crime.
And, I don't know what the **** you said.
Don't stop now.
There's just something about the idea of Burkett sitting on his porch and thinking "ya know, I bet I can whip up one of them there Bush do ents on my 'puter, take 'em down to Kinko's, send them over to Rather, and nail Bush's ass to the wall!" that makes me laugh.
Pass the popcorn timvp. This is entertaining!![]()
Yeah, and make it a Jumbo!
A thing of note is that David Van Os, Burkett's attorney, is a Democrat candidate for the Supreme Court of Texas and that Burkett is the head of Van Os' campaign steering committee. It does make you wonder if there might be more of a connection to other parts of the Democrat party.
You know, some fake memos today, a federal judgeship tomorrow...
I've faked it. You know, when it's enough already and I just want to get some sleep.
God, please push this to page 26, I'm gonna get busted if that scantily clad woman, at the top of page 25, comes up one more time...
Thanks!
Maybe that'll be enough lines...
It's not the length that matters, Yoni!! :p
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)