Why would Pop play the guys tonight? Obviously tired..
Partly because we're tired. No penetration, all outside jump shots.
Why would Pop play the guys tonight? Obviously tired..
4th game in 5 nights was hoping for a W but can't win them all now back to square 1 with Jax out hopefully he can be back soon than later seeing green playing SF is not a pretty sight.
You dont pull the white flag, games vs contenders are too rare to do that, we need every bit of info/testing vs real defenses imo
Now Pop will do what he should've done at tip off ... play a lineup of Mills, De Colo, Blair, Bonner and Neal.
If it hadn't been for Stern's dictatorship, the big 3 would've got a lot more rest, and maybe SJax's ankle would've been fine.
Not this game dude...this one is over
No doubt. Leonard is 21, why the cant he match Melo on minutes? This little 4th quarter Knicks run is on Pop
Doesn't want another fine.
this the type of game Stern wanted against the Heat when Pop send the boys home
Good point. Too bad teams can't fine Stern for lost assetts. Stern should have to pay Jackson's salary until he's back from ankle injury.
I wonder if maybe Manu and Diaw can take some minutes at the 3 with Jax out.
Team obviously tired, plus Neal having a very terrible game. Yeah, in hindsight, Pop should have given the big 3 imaginary injuries and rested them.
That shot selection is why Neal has balls of steel. Sure when he misses they look like terrible shots but you have to take the bad with the good. You know who had pretty good shot selection and tried really hard to just fit in? RJ.
dunno whats the point of a motivation speech when the chokers on the team has called it in a night
LOL Blair just nodding his head in la la la land while pop yells at the spurs at the start of the 4th.
Lol Blair.
NO ball handlers out on the court. Nice.
Agreed.
novak has 2 3s in bonners face already
novak out-bonnering bonner
Bonner with the rare airball?
wankers on the taem wasting splitters hard fought effort tonight
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)