Reply With Quote
10-11-2010#148
DarrinS
You know what? it. I don't even care about the "denier" label any more. The AGW ship has been sinking for some time now and its advocates are scurrying around like drowning rats trying to save it. Time and observations will disprove this pseudoscience, just like it disproved other ty theories from the 1970's.
With all the "overwheming evidence" to support AGW, a sci-fi docudrama by a Nobel-winning ex vice president, and a more than willing mainstream media, you'd think that more than a third of the population would believe that humans cause climate change.
Why is getting harder and harder to sell this ROCK SOLID science?
I post anecdotal evidence to make fun of AGW alarmists, who constantly use anecdotal evidence to support their cause.
That said, there hasn't been statistically significant warming in the last 15 years. , even Phil Jones admits that.
Has the Earth warmed in the past century? Yes.
Is that warmth unprecedented? I don't think so.
Given the hundreds of factors that affect climate, is human-produced CO2 the PRIMARY cause of this warming? I don't think so.
That's a relief. How about 30 years? We only need 15 more years of no statistically significant warming.
---------------------------------------
13 years later:
The science has gotten better, the pause that convinced D that this whole global waming thing was fake ended years ago, and the acceleration of warming coupled with CO2 continues.
