Or New York.
Supposedly New York is interested AKA D'Antoni.
I'm guessing RJ has an arranged deal somewhere, otherwise he isn't THAT stupid to opt out is he?
Yeah, the Spurs don't have other great options now but RJ is basically a drag. The chances of him somehow improving were low and a trade was probably not going to happen in my opinion. I can deal with him leaving, but I just wish we knew this before the draft. Then we could have tried to buy a ing pick to get someone like Pondexter. That's the part that rubs me.
Or New York.
Supposedly New York is interested AKA D'Antoni.
Or he ends up as Plan F in New York.
Not good. The Spurs pretty much have to bring RJ back. It was going to be a struggle to begin with for the Spurs to build up the neccessary depth to compete for a le. If RJ walks without the Spurs getting anything in return then they're screwed.
hmmmmmmmmmmm.
I am happy that Holt will not have to bite that bullet. Truth is that RJ would not have brought the Spurs anything they were willing to take on. This is it for the Spurs, they will not bring back a long-term contract just to get rid of RJ.
Tracy McGrady anyone? He will be taking an Iversonesque paycut this season, and he is better than anything else you guys can get for the money. If he is somewhat healthy, he could be a steal.
no doubt cg things got a interesting fast
Also, it was not like the Spurs were really going to use Jefferson's expiring anyways. That only has value if you're willing to continue to stay above the lux tax threshold. The value for the Spurs would have been that he walked at its end.
Jefferson just saved Holt Cat a nice chunk of change.
McGrady only wants to play for contenders. The Spurs are done contending.
At this point I woulden't mind this.
Uh, you have a link for that?
All reports and things that have been said pointed to the Spurs using that contract as a trade sweetner..
Alright thanks kori. I was about to go ape if that was the case
Sorry I'm on my phone hard for me to keep up
My guess is the Spurs committed to re-signing him at a lower figure, provided he doesn't find a better deal elsewhere.
Its time for you to step away from the computer and take a nap.
From Hoopshype.com
Chris Paul notwithstanding, the wild card in the point-guard market remains Tony Parker. One source said the Spurs are bent on moving him, but that will take time to play out. The Knicks are the most likely destination for Parker, but they need to address their top priority LeBron before they go down that road. CBSSports.com
Did you really believe the Spurs would stay above the lux tax threshold indefinitely, especially on the downside of Duncan's career?
I actually liked watching Vinny play. The guy was smooth.
Cadillac Anderson
Corey Alexander
Nick Van Exel
Danny Ferry
Monty Williams
Doc Rivers...
For some reason I can't post here on my phone![]()
I certainly hope that's the case. RJ does have a fair amount of leverage here. If it takes something like a 3yr-$24 mil deal to keep RJ, the Spurs pretty much have to cough it up.
dr rivers wasnt that bad lol
This thread has so much classic TPark knee-jerk reactionary bull .
Not going to read through 21 pages (yet). And I'm sure this has been said already, but not good news for the Spurs as a team. Weakens the SF position (as in, no one there) and reduces dramatically our tradable assets.
I would be curious to see if behind the scenes the Spurs were working on shopping RJeff and he decided to take his own fate in his hands instead.
What would be reasonable for the Spurs? 4 years, $28M? Or would RJ balk at that?
The only problem with him saying that is that most contenders are already above the luxury tax, and are only going to want to pay him the vet minimum. Were the spurs to give him a 2 year 8 million deal (second year team option) I have a feeling he would jump at it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)