^^^ not really, if you've read the entire thread, you'd know my stance.
well your terrible at it.
^^^ not really, if you've read the entire thread, you'd know my stance.
Except Stein is apparently wrong. That's not anywhere in the rules.
im to pissed to read 20 pages of this garbage. are you kidding me? you think artest should be suspended thats all i needed to ing know. you so called stance doesnt matter to me.
TNT is getting ready to talk about the suspension now if anyone is interested. inside the nba.
thank you kori. your the only one that makes sense to me right now. if its not in the damn rules then how the can he get suspended?
Oh well it's over and done with. He won't be there tomorrow, the Spurs will need to get off to a good start and remained focused as the Kings will be a little pissed and have that extra drive.
But this series will still be over quick.
Sorry, RON ARTEST.
Give it a rest dude, the NBA can do whatever it wants, i'm sure they fact checked before suspending a guy without pay or not.
Oh they definitely CAN suspended him -- that's in there as an option. But it wasn't an automatic suspension from what I see in the rules.
its ok. i will judge it by what happens tomorrow.
Do you know if this memo about forearms to the head actually exists? Supposedly people have been saying it was given out before the playoffs.
give it a rest? if this was someone on your team it would be ing world war three on this forum. and they probably didnt check . this was a reputation suspension simple as that. CASE CLOSED!
I heard there was a memo saying they weren't going to put up with much but I don't think that it said anything specific about "forearms to the head".
In the rules, it says "elbow above the shoulders" should be automatic ejection. It says that they can be given Flagrant 1 or 2. Flagrant 1 or 2 can warrant fine and/or suspension. So if they deemed it a flagrant after reviewing the tape, they definitely have a right to suspend him.
The dude has done more than enough to earn his short leash. Oh and they have the right to suspend someone for a forearm to the head.
I'm sorry Ron. I guess you misunderstood me.
Actually, I think he shouldn't even be in the league.
There, that's better.
Good
Now tell that to LJ![]()
LJ thinks the same thing.![]()
Wow, Kenny and Charles seem to think the suspension was ok.
Yep they realize that you just can't nail someone in the head
But Charles said that Artest could have done it, but just not out in the open![]()
Yep they realize that you just can't nail someone in the head out in front of the referee
Ernie on suspension: "Was it warranted?"
Kenny : "Oh, it's automatic, that's the new rule "
Charles: "Ernie, you can't go around hittin' people in the head"
Well you can. But there's consequences.![]()
He didn't say that's the new rule. Did he? I think he said, that's the rule (which he's probably just repeating what Stein printed).
He said "new".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)