Reply With Quote
Tell Flabbs, not me
650 janitors are against Ford taking a
Who gives a what a stupid news article
Tell Flabbs, not me
Theres problaby about 10,000 law professors in the US
only 650 believing Ford
Theres problaby about 10,000 law professors in the US
Counselor - you are as bad as that corrupt group of senators.
The white house - had kavanaugh - all day long-every day for a week - just making him recite talking points.
Over and over and over - to hide his impropriety.
("I want a fair process") ("I'm not saying dr. ford didn't suffer something, somewhere")
He might as well have been a GOP robot.
The FBI could catch him off guard, ask him to answer yes or no questions - and NOT allow him to go on his filibustering bull tangents about "precedents" and "judge assholio mentioned in his decision in 1973" garbage that he used to evade questions and not answer until - either GRASSLEY - rescued him - or the 5 minutes ran out.
That prosecutor was a joke - she was placed in there - with two people to interview, no witnesses, no FBI investigation, no accomplice under oath, etc...
I have never seen so many people so scared of a proper impartial investigation - yet steadfastly defend a very shaky suspect, a liar, a man with no business serving on the SC.
yep they stopped trump becoming president did they not!
they do not believe her they hate brett and do not want him on supreme courtTheres problaby about 10,000 law professors in the US
Major Coalition of Churches Denounces Kavanaugh and Decries His 'Extreme Partisan Bias' and 'Outright Falsehoods' as Disqualifying
The nation's largest association of churches is calling for Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to be withdrawn.
the National Council of Churches — the nation's largest coalition of churches, including over 40 Protestant and Eastern Orthodox denominations — released a letter condemning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and calling for him to be withdrawn.
"Judge Kavanaugh exhibited extreme partisan bias and disrespect towards certain members of the committee and
thereby demonstrated that he possesses neither the temperament nor the character essential for a member of the highest court in our nation," it said in a statement.
In addition, they noted,
Kavanaugh made "several misstatements and some outright falsehoods," in conversation with the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Furthermore,
"Judge Kavanaugh’s extensive judicial and political record is troubling with regard to issues of
voting rights,
racial and gender justice,
health care,
the rights of people with disabilities, and
environmental protections.
This leads us to believe that he cannot be an impartial justice in cases that are sure to come before him at the Court."
"We are deeply disturbed by the multiple allegations of sexual assault and
call for a full and unhindered investigation of these accusations."
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...uncil-churches
... McC and accomplices are laughing their asses off at the NCC.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-03-2018 at 08:57 PM.
Rep. Jackson Lee intern arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing
Samuel Chamberlain
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep...anaugh-hearing
FBI report expected imminently, one copy to be placed in Senate Judiciary Committee safe
I think Heitkamp will vote no. Looks very certain she's going to lose her Senate seat and a yes vote kills her chances of future positions in the party. She's young enough to care about that.
It's too bad Kori Ellis didn't ban you for doxxing Ford on here.
You are aware that this has nothing to do with the discussion.
The discussion the above was involved in was FORD’s credibility.
That her therapist might have considered her unreliable from her notes.
Thanks for your input.
Theres problaby about 10,000 law professors in the US
But but they hurt Merlin Garland...
Kavanaugh was crossed by DEMs. Mitc barely asked him a question. She questioned Ford, but did an investigation, not a cross examination. If you put a defense attorney on her with cross examination, you would acknowledge that her story does add up. Every inconsistency and every back track would be used to call into question all her memories. Frankly, the whole hearing couldn’t have been more favorable to DEMs. Ford got kid glove treatment and Kavanaugh got ripped to shreds by DEMs.
Kavanaugh is not some two bit. He’s a smart dude. FBI isn’t going to play some magic mind game and trick him into some confession like a Hollywood movie.
Law school professors detest any attorney that is a textualist. This is hardly surprising.650? Wow:
Won't matter though
The GOP doesn't care what "academics" have to say -- no matter how right or wrong they are.
Vote set for Friday
Everything is pointing towards him getting confirmed and confirmed easily (based on final vote count)... but i wouldn't be surprised at all if something unexpected happens.
Judiciary Dems: Claims that past FBI probes gave no hint of Kavanaugh allegations are 'not accurate'
Committee Democrats (excluding Sens. Chris Coons and Amy Klobuchar) are asking Grassley
to correct what they say is a misleading tweet about Brett Kavanaugh's confidential FBI background investigation.
And what they are objecting to is quite the revelation.
This is the tweet the Democrats are objecting to:
Senate Judiciary
✔@senjudiciary
· Oct 2, 2018
As part of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to
#SCOTUS, the FBI conducted its SIXTH full-field background investigation of Judge Kavanaugh since 1993.
As part of these 6 prior FBI investigations,
the FBI interviewed nearly 150 different people who know Judge Kavanaugh personally. 1/2✔@senjudiciaryAnd here is their extremely pointed public response (emphasis ours):
Nowhere
in any of these six FBI reports, which the committee has reviewed on a bipartisan basis,
was there ever a whiff of ANY issue – at all – related in any way to inappropriate sexual behavior or alcohol abuse. 2/2
11:10 AM - Oct 2, 2018
Each of us reviewed the confidential background investigation of Judge Kavanaugh before the hearing.
While we are limited in what we can say about this background investigation in a public setting,
we are compelled to state for the record that
there is information in the second post that is not accurate.
We urge you to ensure that these Twitter posts are promptly corrected.
It is troubling that the Committee Majority
has characterized information from Judge Kavanaugh's confidential background investigation on Twitter,
as that information is confidential and not subject to public release.
If the Committee Majority is going to violate that confidentiality and characterize this background investigation publicly,
you must at least be honest about it.
Translation, not that it needs much:
The Senate Judiciary tweet (the account is controlled by the Majority and has been explicitly partisan in its statements)
is factually wrong
when it claims there was never "a whiff" of information on "inappropriate sexual behavior or alcohol abuse" by Kavanaugh in his already-compiled background checks.
But those records are to be kept strictly confidential:
Senators are not allowed to reveal their contents,
even (seemingly) when the information is directly pertinent to public allegations and testimony.
In the public Republican claims that those records do not contain information on "inappropriate sexual behavior or alcohol abuse",
Senate Democrats are accusing
Republicans of both breaking that confidentiality and lying;
while Democrats cannot directly reveal what is in those files,
they feel they can publicly respond to a Republican announcement of their contents that,
each of the Democrats who have seen those files believe, is untrue.
This is resulting in a Senate knife fight on Twitter, because this is our lives now, but it seems
Judiciary Committee Republicans may have opened the door to revealing possible concerns over Kavanaugh's record
that could not have been made public
if it were not for Republicans botching things with improper public assertions about those government files.
If Democrats are right, however,
Kavanaugh was nominated for the Supreme Court
despite a record that contained questions either about his "inappropriate sexual behavior" or "alcohol abuse."
That's not too surprising, given the revelations his former classmates have been willing to pipe up with in recent days,
but it's also another reminder that none of this is going away.
Reporters are finding out about it;
witnesses continue to come forward.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1801291
in short, the Repugs play really dirty, with no consequences. So the Repugs, knowing about K's huge problems with booze and women, still nominated him.
Why aren't the Dems, like Schumer etc, raising bloody in press conferences, on TV, in the press?
Smart... Anyone who gets into these prestigious law schools is school smart. But...
I’ll write my own tirade without any outside suggestions and then I’m gonna consistently bang on what a great guy I am and how hard I worked, cry and rage, instead of consistently reiterating that Ford is completely and utterly wrong because I never have assaulted ANY woman ever. She is dead wrong. But... but... my daughter and I will pray for her???
No,let’s cry about daddy teaching me about making calendars and the great time I had at Red Sox games. No one fckn cares. Tell the world over and over in every question how wrong she is. Not wander off into your BBall captain memories and your ability to remember everything while blottoed.
K is a lying frat boy. That’s all.
He will be on the SC and I can’t wait for his first opinion for the majority.
“First off, I like beer.” It’s a joke for a joke of a presidency.
The red team decided they could not question Ford. Get that straight. Then they continually apologized to K. Get that straight. You have a selective recollection.
I like beer, too.
But I’ve never sexually assaulted anyone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
