Wild guess....
At least $40,000 per day more. I know, not a whole lot compared to government spending, but it's the principle.
salary? I don't know. Still, if they go away from home, I'm all but certain they get paid more. Doesn't that stand to reason?
I used to have a job that I was paid $21.60/hr. in the early 90's. If I was on standby, to be called at a moments notice, I got paid an $5.00 per hour just to sit at home and do anything, but I couldn't get intoxicated. If I was away for business.... I was paid something like $38 per hour for a minimum 8 worked, plus the $5 per hour for hours not worked,plus per-diem.
If she paid for all the rooms, I don't have a problem in that aspect. I stated this before. I still think the first family is taking more vacations than they should for the state of the economy, and compared to how other presidents took their vacations. Doesn't it stand to reason that they should be considerate of tax dollar expenditures that they have control over?
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 08-13-2010 at 09:00 PM.
Wild guess....
At least $40,000 per day more. I know, not a whole lot compared to government spending, but it's the principle.
I agree, and for vacations I have no problem if the Obama's pay what it would cost for a plane ticket and rooms, etc.
My problem is the frequency of vacations, and in this economy. Shouldn't they set an example if they wish to be seen as leaders?
Good point; this is probably valid.
WC, point taken about vacation time as well.
If that is the case, they should be spending more money on as many vacations as possible.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)