Reply With Quote
This isn't about Trump. You specifically made a thread about Hillary.
Sack up for once and drop the deflection attempts. Was Comey lying or was Hillary lying?
TSA, , get back to us when Hillary OUT-LIES your boy trash.
The way Comey broke FBI protocol to slime non-indictable Hillary politically, I'd say his veracity, objectivity are very much in doubt.
This isn't about Trump. You specifically made a thread about Hillary.
Sack up for once and drop the deflection attempts. Was Comey lying or was Hillary lying?
Why Did Clinton Just Tap a Pro-TPP, Pro-KXL, Pro-Fracking Politician to Head Her Transition Team?
Hillary Clinton has announced former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar as the head of her transition team.
Salazar is a former U.S. senator from Colorado who now works at WilmerHale, one of the most influential lobbying firms in Washington.
Some groups have criticized Salazar’s selection due to his vocal support of fracking, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Keystone XL pipeline.
http://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/1...ton_just_tap_a
No surprise, Hillary is a center right, pro-BigCorp, pro-"trade", neocon Repug.
This is like Obama appointing a ing investment banker to be WH Chief of Staff.
New Abedin Emails Reveal Hillary Clinton State Department Gave Special Access to Top Clinton Foundation Donors
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-r...dation-donors/
or
New Emails Show Clinton Foundation Sought Access to State Department on Donors’ Behalf
http://www.wsj.com/articles/new-emai...alf-1471891203
she is a
...and she's going to win...and there is nothing you can do about it.
I can buy trump signs, I can send money to trump, I can start a super pac against Hillary I can do lots of things
Trash fellators (if y'all can find it) lied to again. Judicial Watch is just another cog in the VRWC propaganda machine.
Media Continue To Fall For Clinton Foundation Pseudo-Scandals Promoted By Judicial Watch
But the emails show that the meeting was proposed and arranged through “normal” and “official channels,” not through “special access” as Judicial Watch characterized it.
Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain “asked to see [Clinton] thurs and fri thru normal channels,” according to the emails, and Clinton didn’t “want to commit to anything” until she confirmed her schedule and how she was feeling.
Later that week, Abedin confirmed that Clinton and her staff “reached out [to Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain] thru official channels” to set up the meeting.
According to a write-up from Agence France-Presse, obtained via Nexis search, the meeting was about the “tense post-election climate in Iran and the Middle East peace process” -- exactly the sorts of topics one would expect the secretary of state to discuss with a Middle Eastern leader.
Given that past secretaries of state and US presidents have met with Crown Prince Salman -- includingCondoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and President George W. Bush -- it’s not unusual that the crown prince sought a meeting with Clinton during her tenure as secretary of state, and there is no evidence he got the meeting due to his affiliation with the Clinton Foundation.
But that hasn't prevented the press from trying to turn the meeting into a scandal.
Media outlets immediately ran with the story, suggesting that “the new revelations,” as Politico put it, “add to the controversy that has swirled around the Clinton Foundation, with Donald Trump and other critics accusing Hillary Clinton of using her position at the State Department to reward major donors through access to other power players.”
The Wall Street Journal scandalized the emails, saying they “could fuel criticismthat the Clinton family’s charitable foundation, in fundraising with wealthy donors, corporations and foreign nations, created a conflict of interest for Mrs. Clinton during her work as the nation’s top diplomat.”
A Fox News article wrote that “Such emails have fueled accusations from Republicans of a ‘pay-to-play’ operation.”
CNN’s John Berman said, "It doesn't literally have to be provable pay to play to have an appearance problem."
These accounts adopt Judicial Watch’s frame that the meeting between Bahrain’s crown prince and Clinton was granted only because of “special, expedited access” and “preferential treatment” because of his relationship with the Clinton Foundation, and that at the least, the emails and meeting reflect bad optics.
Judicial Watch is a right-wing organization with a history of duping the press on Clinton email stories.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/08...rica+-+Blog%29
y'all dumbuckas suckered again!
Kristol was responding to the revelations Hillary Clinton's top aide Huma Abedin had ties for 10 years to a radical Muslim journal before joining her staff at the State Department and her current campaign. When those discoveries have been made in the past, Kristol said on "Steve Malzberg Show," "people tend to get fired or disciplined, and the Clinton team seems to have no interest in any of that at all."
New email releases, subpoenas from Congress
The charitable foundation has been scrutinized throughout Hillary Clinton's presidential bid, but the organization has faced greater scrutiny since emails were newly uncovered showing a top Clinton Foundation donor seeking access to a top diplomat when Clinton was secretary of state.
That is one of a way to get rich
Daily Caller: Condi Rice Denies Having Email Conversation with Hillary
oh no a woman telling another woman not the way it is
ABC News: Hillary Lied About Donor Access During 2009 Confirmation Hearing
ducks is trying sooooo hard to make Trump look less ty.
calling ducks desperate while you make threads about Trump's tie length
Stephen Colbert releases sex tape of Trash motorboating Julie Annie (Giuliani in drag, again. America's Major Assholes really likes dressing up)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=b_aQj05VC_I
They aren't very clear on the timing of when these additional 14,900 were recovered. Is the FBI still investigating?
FBI uncovers 14,900 more do ents in Clinton email probe
The FBI’s year-long investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server uncovered 14,900 emails and do ents from her time as secretary of state that had not been disclosed by her attorneys, and a federal judge on Monday pressed the State Department to begin releasing emails sooner than mid-October as it planned.
Justice Department lawyers said last week that the State Department would review and turn over Clinton’s work-related emails to a conservative legal group. The records are among “tens of thousands” of do ents found by the FBI in its probe and turned over to the State Department, Justice Department attorney Lisa Ann Olson said Monday in court.
The 14,900 Clinton do ents are nearly 50 percent more than the roughly 30,000 emails that Clinton’s lawyers deemed work-related and returned to the department in December 2014.
Lawyers for the State Department and Judicial Watch, the legal group, are negotiating a plan for the release of the emails in a civil public records lawsuit before U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg of Washington
In a statement after a hearing at the U.S. district courthouse in Washington, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the group was pleased that Boasberg rejected the department’s proposal to begin releasing do ents weekly on Oct. 14, ordering it instead to prioritize Clinton’s emails and to return to court Sept. 22 with a new plan.
“We’re pleased the court accelerated the State Department’s timing,” Fitton said. “We’re trying to work with the State Department here, but let’s be clear: They have slow-walked and stonewalled the release of these records. They’ve had many of them since July 25 ... and not one record has yet been released, and we don’t understand why that’s the case.”
“State has not yet had the opportunity to complete a review of the do ents to determine whether they are agency records or if they are duplicative of do ents State has already produced through the Freedom of Information Act,” Toner said. “We cannot comment further as this matter is in ongoing litigation.”
Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said, “As we have always said, Hillary Clinton provided the State Department with all the work-related emails she had in her possession in 2014. We are not sure what additional materials the Justice Department may have located, but if the State Department determines any of them to be work-related, then obviously we support those do ents being released publicly as well.”
Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in May 2015 after disclosures that Clinton had exclusively used a personal email server while secretary of state. Judicial Watch had sought all emails sent or received by Clinton at the State Department in a request made under the federal Freedom of Information Act, which covers the release of public records.
In a statement, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the agency previously agreed voluntarily to hand over emails sent or received by Clinton in her official capacity as secretary from 2009 to 2013 but that tens of thousands of do ents would have to be “carefully appraised at State” to separate official records from personal ones.
Monday’s hearing comes seven weeks after the Justice Department closed a criminal investigation without charges into the handling of classified material in Clinton’s email setup, which FBI Director James B. Comey called “extremely careless.”
On Aug. 5, the FBI completed transferring what Comey said were several thousand previously undisclosed work-related Clinton emails that the FBI found in its investigation for the State Department to review and make public. Government lawyers until now had given no details about how many emails the FBI found or when the full set would be released. It is unclear how many do ents might be attachments, duplicates or exempt from release for privacy or legal reasons.
Government lawyers disclosed last week that the FBI has turned over eightcomputer discs of information: one including emails and attachments that were sent directly to or from Clinton, or to or from her at some point in an email chain, and were not previously turned over by her lawyers; a second with classified do ents; another with emails returned by Clinton; and five containing materials from other people retrieved by the FBI.
The 14,900 do ents at issue now come from the first disc, Fitton said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...2b4_story.html
calling ducks desperate while you make threads about Trump's tie length
mocking Trash's power tie length isn't desperate, it's hilarious
Put on a Clinton pantsuit and jump in traffic.
Clinton Campaign Says AP Refused To Delete Factually Inaccurate Tweet About Clinton Foundation
The Associated Press
✔@AP
BREAKING: AP analysis: More than half those who met Clinton as Cabinet secretary gave money to Clinton Foundation.
Adam Khan @Khanoisseur
Clinton Foundation has 7000 donors.
Hillary met with 60 as SoS= ~1%.
Wouldn't have made for a great AP tweet @brianefallon@SheWhoVotes
https://thinkprogress.org/clinton-ca...e3d#.945ldverb
you rightwingnuts get suckered again.
Clinton Campaign Says AP Refused To Delete Factually Inaccurate Tweet About Clinton Foundation
The Associated Press
✔@AP
BREAKING: AP analysis: More than half those who met Clinton as Cabinet secretary gave money to Clinton Foundation.
Adam Khan @Khanoisseur
Clinton Foundation has 7000 donors.
Hillary met with 60 as SoS= ~1%.
Wouldn't have made for a great AP tweet @brianefallon@SheWhoVotes
https://thinkprogress.org/clinton-ca...e3d#.945ldverb
you rightwingnuts get suckered again.
AP clearly stated they examined only what was given to them after they sued for it.
Clinton Campaign Says AP Refused To Delete Factually Inaccurate Tweet About Clinton Foundation
The Associated Press
✔@AP
BREAKING: AP analysis: More than half those who met Clinton as Cabinet secretary gave money to Clinton Foundation.
Adam Khan @Khanoisseur
Clinton Foundation has 7000 donors.
Hillary met with 60 as SoS= ~1%.
Wouldn't have made for a great AP tweet @brianefallon@SheWhoVotes
https://thinkprogress.org/clinton-ca...e3d#.945ldverb
you rightwingnuts get suckered again.
That statement is just amazingly full of poor reading comprehension and stupidity.
no wonder Bookaki reposted it.
She added: "I know there's a lot of smoke, and there's no fire."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/24/politi...ion/index.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
