Reply With Quote
See: cultural context. Oracle at Delphi, etc.
What you don't realize is that your disbelief is rooted in your own lack of faith... not anything I have or haven't said.
I'm not accountable for you... you are. How about you ponder that...
See: cultural context. Oracle at Delphi, etc.
In , John Mackovic coaches t.u. every year and can never be fired and UCLA is on the schedule every week.
hegamboa and scott are on fire in this thread. they need to put on NOMEX.
ES did I address your questions on the 2nd Law?
I already have NOMEX on... it is my daily attire.
I understand your point, but don't think 2nd Law applies. As long as dS > 0 for the system, 2nd Law is satisfied.
But I would agree that naturalistic science does not have a satisfactory explanation at this time for the fine-tuned structure of DNA.
This "fine-tuning" observation is a recurring theme in other areas of science, for example cosmology.
I know. I was making a pun about the two oil boys in their deep discussion about molecular biology, theology, and U.S. education policy.
I understood it was a pun...
The unique and highly amazing DNA molecule is not only the strongest example of 'Intelligent Design'... it is also a thorn on the side for those wishing to create it from scratch and assume that evolution just 'took it from there.'
Again, without DNA, 'evolution' has no subject to work with, nothing to 'mutate' --- simply, it can't begin. Those ignoring the incredible odds against the formation of DNA from an aqueous pool of ammonia, and small organic precursors would not only have to create the molecule, but somehow ensure that the information contained in the original double-strand be of any biological relevance whatsoever... What is the purpose of a code, without a decoder to even translate the code?
Anyways, DNA is the key.
Given recent events at my company's refineries, which I'm sure hegamboa is acutely aware of at least one of them, that is probably not a bad idea!
CBF needs NOMEX too cos' he is going to llllllll I saiiiidddddd
You can find happiness in slavery.
You are correct, my disbelief is rooted in my lack of faith; you merely reinforce it.
You win.
please enlighten us.
What the is NOMEX? No really, what is it?
I sure hope those of you saying that I am going to are being sarcastic.
So I think religion is for flaming s. Get over it. Why don't you take your own faith to heart and forgive me.
Hypocrites.
No one here is mad at you... and we're not the ones who should be forgiving you... you need to seek forgiveness from above.
Quit being so ambiguous... How so?
It's not us who have to forgive you.
NOMEX is fire-re ant clothing, which will come in handy in the environment of everlasting fire and brimstone.
Shield your eyes in . I understand they have a Jumbotron that shows constant replays of 0.4 and Ginobili's foul on Dirk.
Clearly I am being dead serious.
Repenttttttttt I saaaiiiiiiddddddd
Bible is pure fiction like santa and the easter bunny, jesus christ.
then explain to me few things:
1. Explain to me the existence of a conscience? If there's no higher power why do we have a sense of right and wrong?
2. Do rapist, murders, child molestors, and thieves who get away with their crimes on earth ever pay for their transgressions? If not, why do most people feel like they do? Is it because like the bible says we are created in God's image and the bible says violators of the law will pay the price?
rofl
Ya'll call me ignorant, and damned because I said religion is for s, and now I am supposed to say I am sorry and ask for the christian God to forgive me?
How will I ever know when he forgives me? Will he intelligently design a thought inside my brain that makes me know I am forgiven?
I don't know if this has been brought up, so forgive me if I am mistaken.
Some people believe that the entire Bible, word for word, has meaning in todays society and is to be taken literally. I will ignore those who believe the Old Testament is literal because that has been proven wrong so many times it would be a waste of time.
In Colassions 4:1, the new testament, you can find this verse.
-"Masters, provide your slaves with what is right and fair, because you know that you also have a Master in heaven."
This is talking to Christians, it implies that it is morally acceptable for Christians to own slaves. How, then, can people use Pauls new testament verses on womens right as fact??
This is clearly talking directly to people in that time period, and has no place in our society. If this is true, then perhaps more of the Bible isn't meant to be taken literally, or used in todays society.
Also, this is found in us 2:9
-"Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
