Thank you Mr. Dictionary. I had it all wrong.
Exactly. They have names -- why do you keep bringing this up?
Thank you Mr. Dictionary. I had it all wrong.
ok so not "officially" like you said
true, true, true, I dont see your point though, what does that have to do with a name or dob?security camera images and witnesses that have identified these men as well as any reasonable person could expect
Peyton Manning was behind 9/11?
victoria victoria, Victoria?
What's the diff? Does anyone think it would be difficult to acquire fake identification? These men were already on a watch list, and yet were able to attend flight school in the states.
What is Victoria's Secret? What do they know?
im just trying to defend my point, that chumpdumper flat out said was wrong, chumpdumper has google, hes a really smart guy, he links sources all the time
"That's OK, they're not saying "boo," they're saying "Muuuu-hammad."
If these guys were so hard to ID and are still alive, why was an LA Times reporter able to write biographies of all 19 hijackers?
http://www.amazon.com/Perfect-Soldie.../dp/0060584696
Didn't you read the thread? We already established that the entire M$M is part of the conspiracy.
for the 3rd time i didnt say they were alive. The fact is you were wrong when you said "yes officially"
That was compelling.never read these bios
Absolutely not. Offically means officially. Not DNA definitively -- that's not possible. But in any legal or investigative sense, they were identified. If your entire worldview is based upon not having DNA samples of the hijackers, there's really no use in going any further.
But on an episode of CSI: NY, the CSI team always is able to recover DNA. Why wouldn't the government allow Gary Sinise, the chick from Providence, and the guy who played on the 1980 US hockey team, to go in and recover the DNA? These are legitimate questions.
i never mentioned anything about DNA, the fact is NO government agency has ever confirmed the real names and real DOB of the 911 hijackers
So this has stopped being a thread about 9/11 conspiracy and started to be a petty argument over semantics? Cool.
But we can't be certain WHICH 19 Islamic terrorists flew planes into buildings on 9/11. Maybe it was Fabu Ayed and not Abu Fayed.
thanks stout thats all i was trying to say, nothing about Bush, the government, or DNA
And now you know why we had to go into Iraq.
Ok, well then, back to you being gullable and insane.
I have heard that evidence exist that Bush himself flew one of
the planes into the WTC and bailed out just before it hit and was
picked up by Cheney and they went hunting at the King ranch.
And that is reason that they couldn't locate Bush for sometime.. That a second (look alike) was
reading to school children and the reason confusion existed as
to what the second (look alike) was suppose to do. Now that sounds really
plausible to me, doesn't it to you?
Of course it is possible, since Bush is an ex-military pilot that
he made a detour by the Pentagon and fired a rocket into it
before flying into the WTC, oh, wait a minute, the Pentagon
was hit afterwards, so guess that story wont hold up. Much
like the ones posted here.
Bush' dad fired the rocket into the Pentagon on the way to a Carlyle board meeting.
Translation VVVVVVV
Did it get a little to hot in the kitchen for your cornbread ass? Maybe you need to change your name to sour dough.
I have been taking insults for 19 pages and you have a meltdown after just one?
I got news for your lame sensitive drama queen ass. You can't put me on Ignore numb nuts I have to many screen names. Don't worry about putting me on Ignore I look froward not having to reply to your simpleminded tree hugging ass.
ok fellas back to your bull debate................![]()
And what will you go back to? Oh yeah, absolutely nothing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)