Yeah I'm sure Trump's more diplomatic peacekeeping tendencies are what won him the election.
The more hawkish candidate just lost the election.
Because....Russia
Yeah I'm sure Trump's more diplomatic peacekeeping tendencies are what won him the election.
those "world" leaders? who?
Which ones had intention of replacing USA's Empire, or degrading it, in preference for their own empire?
Shut up.
G F Y, my little
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-24-2017 at 11:50 AM.
sort ill with increasing military spending, beefing up the nuclear arsenal and projecting strength toward Iran and Syria.
Trump as the candidate of peace is frankly laughable.
Not to mention Cuba
dumbass trump supporters
Such gots.
On our ELE bet how long are we waiting to see if Priebus is the first charged with obstruction of justice?
The warhawks have NOT changed their tune. lyndsey Warhammer and John Mcnuke want a war regardless and are working toward it
Oh and Trumps stance to peace to Russia and war with ISIS did have a big effect on the election
Sadly looks like Trump wants war with Iran so all this "peace" bull is probably going out the window very soon
Don't think trump is a hawk. But he's egotistical and impulsive, so end result could be the same.
Within 2 months.
Good job Trump on pissING off Intel agencies and the media. That will go over smoothly![]()
Plenty of time to prepare your obituary
Following an administration meeting the next morning, according to the White House, McCabe told Priebus there was nothing to the New York Times’ report, using a colorful phrase. Priebus asked: “What can we do about this?” McCabe gave no answer, and told the White House chief of staff he would get back to Priebus on the issue.
Priebus told McCabe the White House was “getting crushed” over the depth of Trump’s ties to Russia, as reported in the New York Times, and asked: “What am I supposed to do?”
Some time later, senior administration officials told reporters, McCabe called Priebus and said: “We’d love to help but we can’t get into the position of making statements on every story.”
Priebus then asked if he could cite anonymous senior intelligence officials in rebutting the Times article, to which McCabe agreed.
Afterward, FBI director James Comey called Priebus and echoed McCabe’s comments. While the story was baseless, Comey declined to issue an FBI statement saying so publicly, according to senior officials.
Asked by the Guardian whether the bureau challenges the White House’s version of events, the FBI declined to comment.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...mey?CMP=twt_gu
Reck this is when hits the fan
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)