I don't think that's the issue, but rather that we're talking about handing the guy 4 years 100 million for a very limited sample of games. If he can sustain his playoff performance in the long run, sure, he'll be worth it. But if he doesn't suddenly it's a pretty difficult position you find yourself in. At the price the Lakers want to sign him for (50 something million) there's no doubt he's a great signing, but at twice that the risks give you pause.
If the Spurs are going to sign Reaves, we probably won't hear anything until the 6th. That'd be a looooong six days
It feels like Brook Lopez is the next decision everyone is waiting on. Grant Williams is an interesting one, too. I don't really like the idea of Williams on the Spurs but I can imagine him being on their radar. IMO, too offensively limited on a team without multiple offensive stars. He's the type of role player the Spurs could go after once Wemby is fully formed -- not now.
Doesn't appear so.
With Spurs seemingly not caring to use their cap space to absorb bad deals and not really needing/wanting any FA anyways, who cares about waiting? Not like SA would be worried about missing on any FA right?If the Spurs are going to sign Reaves, we probably won't hear anything until the 6th. That'd be a looooong six days
It feels like Brook Lopez is the next decision everyone is waiting on. Grant Williams is an interesting one, too. I don't really like the idea of Williams on the Spurs but I can imagine him being on their radar. IMO, too offensively limited on a team without multiple offensive stars. He's the type of role player the Spurs could go after once Wemby is fully formed -- not now.
I really like this roster. There may be some things missing, but turned loose to play hard together I think they will surprise some folks.
Agree
Good character guys too
Not an fa signing. But that bag doe.
Haliburton and Bane with some ridiculous extensions
Oh, yeah, it's midnight on the east coast so extensions can start being signed.
Bane got $207 million
Desmond Bane 5-yr/$207M. This is nuts.
Yeah, the Bane deal feels like Memphis hasn't learned . Though maybe they could be trading Ja? I still want them to find some way to getting Ja and Brooks on that Rockets team.
So Bane is gonna get 40mil but people here are hesitant about giving Reaves 25?
You have some teams super-concerned about top contracts and what the new CBA means.
Then you have Indiana and Mephis going LLEEEEERROOOY JEEENNNKIIINNNNSSS
vassell gonna want a fat contract as well
That Bane deal, oof
Need to get Vassell down to 4/100
Yes, because 40mil is ing absurd. 25 for a guy who played well for a month is also absurd.So Bane is gonna get 40mil but people here are hesitant about giving Reaves 25?
Bane getting $207 million is great news for Vassell. He's gotta feel pretty good about his chances of getting $100 million.
Speaking of Haliburton and Bane, reminds me that I really thought the Spurs were picking Haliburton over Vassell and I heard a lot of noise on that draft day that the Spurs really wanted Bane too.
https://www.spurstalk.com/san-antoni...020-nba-draft/
I'd rather have Wemby so I'm not mad but, woah, would Haliburton and Bane have been one of a haul that night.
This the new cba rookie extensions? Why bane got 40.
Bane produced significantly more during the regular season than Reaves. Although Bane leveraged himself well here. I don’t like the contract but I understand the position Memphis is in.So Bane is gonna get 40mil but people here are hesitant about giving Reaves 25?
Just further proof that building with guys like Keldon who perform at a high level compared to their contract is way more pragmatic and indicative of long term roster flexibility and viability.
A lot of teams are gonna be zip tied and ed if things don’t pan out.
In hindsight that haul wouldn’t have positioned us in a great situation.
So let’s say production is similar had the Spurs picked them. Having both wouldn’t equate to being at the level of a team that could make a deep run and you’d be locked into those contracts with minimal flexibility. Seems that would put us in purgatory more than anything.
The rookie extensions are fine, the $$ values just look huge with the cap going up. Halliburton was a major of offense and the Pacers were essentially a .500 team with him, which is great work given the state of the rest of their roster. Bane was a high volume, efficient scorer, and is growing in his ability to be a second side / tertiary offensive creator.
There's always a possibility that they don't live up to the money, but that's always a risk, and the evidence on their growth, and value so far indicates it's probably fine. Good players cost $.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
