Some JACKASS took Tony Romo and thats what i had left... lol he was a good value pick late in the draft so no complaints here.
Thats rough bro... im dealin with an autodrafted team in another league and the is damn near impossible. Im about to be 1-8 in that league.I'm still pissed at auto draft giving me ray rice in first round. I was about 30 seconds too late signing in.:
Are any of you guys in big money leagues?? Like $100 leagues or greater? I think im ready to take my football prognosticating talents on money making ventures (no avante)
Take Romo, get good numbers from him in September and October, then trade him sometime in November so I can avoid the December Romo meltdown. It's my strategy every year(however I have a bad hunch he'll buck that trend this year)
Last edited by DUNCANownsKOBE; 11-04-2013 at 11:20 PM.
Did I end up beating J.T.? Too lazy to log into my other yahoo account to find out.
By 8 points
#swag
Well, looks like I'm watching the playoffs from home this year.
my strength of schedule tbh...
•If they played the same schedule as HarlemHeat37, Lincoln would be 6-2.
•If Lincoln had played every team in the league each week, they would be 74-25.
•HarlemHeat37 would be 4-4 if they played the same schedule as Lincoln.
•HarlemHeat37 would be 54-44-1 if they played every team every week.
I have to run the table to have a chance of getting in. That tie really hurt
Sorry DD. My negro Peyton is gonna go HAM this week.
And I wish Harlem would stop sending these ty ass trade proposals
Harlem finally convinced a
i was under the impression 6 teams makes the playoffs and was just chillin at the 6th spot and pull a giants/ravens playoff push, then i look and only 4 advances
Yeah imo it should be 6 but it's prolly too late to change the format.Harlem finally convinced a
i was under the impression 6 teams makes the playoffs and was just chillin at the 6th spot and pull a giants/ravens playoff push, then i look and only 4 advances
When I was King I changed it
Well I my vote is yes if the king, J.T. is interested in changing it.
We can change it to 6 if yall want. My re ed friend is commisshing a 12-teamer on ESPN.com and they're letting 8/12 into the postseason. Need at least half the league to vote yes to do this though, I am firmly entrenched in my role as The People's Commissioner right now and can't bend on that in good conscience. I'll cast my vote as yes.
K so that's two votes for yes.
And I agree that 8/12 is too many.
Instead of paying 3rd place like we are, they are paying the overall points leader his buy in back. Same league I drafted homeboy's girlfriend's team. Her team is like 6-3 right now or some and she hasn't made a single roster move. Meanwhile in our league my team can't win a game with Nick Foles putting up 66. FML. She said I get half the money if she wins any in her league so I've got that as a longshot consolation prize at this point.
My vote is no. You losers need to suck it up. Huge trades and bending the rules wont make your team better or increase your shocking lack of football knowledge. No excuses. Chumps.
No
Yes for 6..
i was under the impression top 2 seeds gets a bye.
i vote yes also.
is it even possible to change?
no
not like im getting in either way so yes. change it up. maybe an underdog 6 seed will win it and piss everyone off. -)
Yes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote