the deployment of US troops to quell disturbances stirred up by immigration enforcement, but only in cities with Democratic mayors/governors
ethnic cleansing, undertaken with gratuitous violence
the deployment of US troops to quell disturbances stirred up by immigration enforcement, but only in cities with Democratic mayors/governors
Trump's halfway through in 10 months
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grieva...f_Independence
widespread administrative detention of US citizens
a relative novelty
Charlotte is wondering why
—
https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/17/us/ch...-border-patrolWith dozens of people arrested in North Carolina’s largest city during the Department of Homeland Security’s latest targeted immigration blitz, one question has emerged for many of its residents and leaders: Why Charlotte?
The city hadn’t been previously publicly singled out as an enhanced immigration enforcement target by the Trump administration in the same way as other cities like Chicago and Los Angeles. It’s a Democrat-led city, but it’s hundreds of miles away from either the northern or southern border. And crime has dropped 8% from last year, with violent crimes down 20%, according to data released by the city in October.
Before it even started, the announcement that an immigration enforcement operation would arrive in Charlotte – right off the heels of a weekslong operation that led to hundreds of arrests and fierce protests in Chicago – provoked fear and anxiety in the city.
Democratic leaders in Charlotte have largely framed the operation – which came as a surprise to local officials – as a political distraction ahead of next year’s midterm elections.
“This administration ran on rhetoric that is anti-immigrant to score political points,” said City Council member Dimple Ajmera, a Democrat. “We have a very important US Senate race in 2026 coming up. And they want to score political points and use fear to divide our community.”
unfortunately for your side, Lionel Hutz appears to be in charge of prosecuting Comey
the magistrate found eleven separate errors in Halligan's submission, two were misstatements of fundamental law to the grand jury, below
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...2136.191.0.pdf![]()
The Court recognizes that the relief sought by the defense is rarely granted. However, the record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding. Therefore, in this case, “the Court has before it a rare example of a criminal defendant who can actually make a ‘particularized and factually based’ showing that grounds exist to support the proposition that irregularities may have occurred in the grand jury proceedings and may justify the dismissal of one or more counts of the indictment.” See Naegele, 474 F. Supp. 2d at 10 (citations omitted).
Accordingly, the defense request for all grand jury materials is granted.
ENTERED this 17th day of November 2025.
___(signature)_________________________________
WILLIAM E. FITZPATRICK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court need not now determine whether any facts herein have been proven, or whether there is merit to any motion yet to be filed. That task may lie ahead. Rather, the Court is finding that the government’s actions in this case–whether purposeful, reckless, or negligent–raise genuine issues of misconduct, are inextricably linked to the government’s grand jury presentation, and deserve to be fully explored by the defense.
Halligan is having trouble showing her work
(it's her first prosecution -- Halligan's an insurance lawyer)
online lawyers are saying this is about as close as a judge gets to calling the government liars
The short time span between the moment the prosecutor learned that the grand jury rejected one count in the original indictment and the time the prosecutor appeared in court to return the second indictment could not have been sufficient to draft the second indictment, sign the second indictment, present it to the grand jury, provide legal instructions to the grand jury, and give them an opportunity to deliberate and render a decision on the new indictment. If the prosecutor is mistaken about the time she received notification of the grand jury’s vote on the original indictment, and this procedure did take place, then the transcript and audio recording provided to the Court are incomplete.12 If this procedure did not take place, then the Court is in uncharted legal territory in that the indictment returned in open court was not the same charging do ent presented to and deliberated upon by the grand jury. Either way, this unusual series of events, still not fully explained by the prosecutor’s declaration, calls into question the presumption of regularity generally associated with grand jury proceedings, and provides another genuine issue the defense may raise to challenge the manner in which the government obtained the indictment.
screwiness detected
If the Court is to read the prosecutor’s declaration as suggesting there was no contact between any government official and the grand jury after 4:28 p.m., then it begs the question of how the then-First Assistant learned that the grand jury had refused to indict on one count, and how the First Assistant knew which count had been rejected by the grand jury, all before the indictment was returned in open court.
(lying to the grand jury about the law to get a speedy indictment is a bad first day at work)
(maybe Halligan/Bondi thought they'd get away with it, since a grand jury isn't an adversarial proceeding -- but they sure did confuse the grand jury judge by presenting two materially different charging do ents)
order stayed until Wednesday so the government can respond
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...2136.197.0.pdf![]()
Why Charlotte?
Revenge on local sheriffs who prefer not to cooperate with ICE
https://boltsmag.org/north-carolina-...l-immigration/
Joey didn't understand any of that.
Tenn Gov. Bill Lee got too far out over his skis
"Crime" is not a magic word
https://www.actionnews5.com/2025/11/...yment-memphis/The Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled that Governor Bill Lee acted beyond his authority in deploying the National Guard to Memphis.A Nashville court found that there was neither a “grave emergency,” “disaster,” nor a request from local leaders for the federal deployment, which is required by law.
Court orders the Tennessee guard to leave Memphis
![]()
(Judges keep calling bull on Republicans' bogus public disorder emergencies)
https://newrepublic.com/post/203321/...urch-charlotteFifteen-year-old Miguel Vazquez was one of the people who took off running when federal agents arrived. “I thought, ‘Wait, why am I running? I’m a citizen,’” Vazquez said.
Is this a job requirement for you Trump s now?
https://x.com/ChenueHer/status/1990929094981095575
this law won't pass, but accountability is coming for Trump's lawless secret police
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...new-rcna244703Seizing on allegations of federal law enforcement officials' committing cons utional violationsas part of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, Democrats have launched a new effort to allow civil rights claims against rogue agents.
Lawmakers reintroduced legislation Tuesday that would ensure federal officials, including immigration agents and other law enforcement officers, can be sued individually for cons utional violations.
The bill, introduced in the House and the Senate by Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., would amend a post-Civil War-era law that allows such claims against state and local officials to make it clear that federal officials are covered, too.
what Trump is doing to this country is outrageous and harmful
https://people.com/more-than-30000-s...raids-11851615More Than 30,000 Students in One North Carolina School District Skipped Class on Monday amid ICE Raids
A large percentage of students in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County did not attend school on Monday after ICE announced 'Operation Charlotte's Web'
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)