Page 25 of 28 FirstFirst ... 152122232425262728 LastLast
Results 601 to 625 of 690
  1. #601
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    In case you haven't seen the pattern yet, we still have laws despite the fact they can be broken by criminals, but such laws typically lead to a reduction in those crimes.

    You're playing the typical NRA talking point monkey that bases his argument on the point that banning all guns won't eliminate 100% of murders, so therefore all gun legislation is moot. I'm not suggesting we ban guns or that we can eliminate murder.
    So what law are you suggesting?

  2. #602
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    We can do a lot more to control access to and usage of high capacity weapons, for one thing.

    Also, the terror watch list restriction should be a no-brainer.

    Eliminate Gun Show exceptions.

    Register all gun owners.

  3. #603
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Did you read it all? It looked like it was very detailed and objective study of a major metropolitan area.

    Now if you want to deny the provided information because it doesn't fit your pre-existing opinion, that's on you.
    Yep.

    I have no opinion on those numbers whatsoever and the numbers don't surprise me one bit.
    Does this mean it could not have been done better by more capable people so we would not be constantly going back and forth on numbers? Plus It's a fairly dry study. There are many more interesting questions.

    You and SA vs. boots and others constantly disagreeing over numbers... Let the people who do these studies for all kinds of public health numbers have a go...? No way, NRA won't have it. People who know how to do proper studies are all liberal gun control advocates I guess.

  4. #604
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Also, the terror watch list restriction should be a no-brainer.
    And note, I have HUGE problems with the Terror Watch List but I believe we should deal with those issues directly, and hey, maybe something like this will cause GOP loyalists to care a little bit more about the suppression of rights based on questionable su ion.

  5. #605
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Sometimes it's criminals shooting at criminals and hitting innocents though. My friend's wife was a victim of this while walking with their 9 year old son to the store.
    Jaywalkers are criminals

  6. #606
    Veteran Aztecfan03's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    4,292
    We can do a lot more to control access to and usage of high capacity weapons, for one thing.

    Also, the terror watch list restriction should be a no-brainer.

    Eliminate Gun Show exceptions.

    Register all gun owners.
    If it's as screwed up as the no-fly list, it needs to be fixed first.

  7. #607
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    you can't deny rights based on pure su ion. the so-called terror list loophole is bunk because the terror watch list is bunk.

    there aren't 1 million terrorists in the USA.

  8. #608
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    same for for the no fly list. certain erosion of liberties with no demonstrable gain in security.

  9. #609
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    pure opportunism on the part of the Dems. same goes for focusing on so-called assault weapons. they're not frequently used in mass killings: handguns are.

  10. #610
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    doing something just to say we did something this time, is pure bs.

  11. #611
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    Holy ! WH and I agree.

  12. #612
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    optics are bad, but Republicans got this one right.

  13. #613
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    wish they would've cared so much for liberty when they ins uted a no-fly list and a terrorist watch list.

  14. #614
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    Dems too, for that matter, but 9/11 turned them into quivering jelly too.

  15. #615
    Veteran HI-FI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    13,358
    damn, i agree with Winehole as well though i have before. was Cornyn's bill any better or more bull ?

    also, not sure if this true but I heard they lost contact with the shooter's wife. if true, how in the is this possible? the guy was already on their radar, feds dropped the ball, then they lost track of his wife?

  16. #616
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    If it's as screwed up as the no-fly list, it needs to be fixed first.
    It needs to be fixed, but I don't know if "first" is realistic until people actually feel the impact.

  17. #617
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    pure opportunism on the part of the Dems. same goes for focusing on so-called assault weapons. they're not frequently used in mass killings: handguns are.
    Neither are nuclear weapons, but there is a reason why they are regulated.
    Should we take NH3N03 off the watch closely list Winehole, it's paperwork for farmers?

  18. #618
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    not arguing for a regulation free environment, just saying this remedy is dubious. it wouldn't have worked for the case that prompted it.

  19. #619
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    are you cool with denying rights to citizens based on mere su ion?

  20. #620
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    what does due process mean to you, pgardn?

  21. #621
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    damn, i agree with Winehole as well though i have before. was Cornyn's bill any better or more bull ?
    more bull . Cornyn's made of it.

  22. #622
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    the terror watch list/no fly list bans are stupid. its just a way to score political points and say "look, we did something" even though it will have a minimal effect on reducing gun deaths and mass shootings

    we need more sweeping reforms than this

  23. #623
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Neither are nuclear weapons, but there is a reason why they are regulated.
    Should we take NH3N03 off the watch closely list Winehole, it's paperwork for farmers?
    Notice my post did not concern people lists.

    It concerns weapons that can be used to kill large numbers of humans very quickly. And monitoring the buying and selling of bomb material. It's common sense. Nothing to do with airplane lists for firearms.

  24. #624
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    same goes for focusing on so-called assault weapons. they're not frequently used in mass killings: handguns are.
    I think it's time to stop lumping shootings like Sandy Hook and Orlando under the same "Mass Killing" umbrella as gang warfare where two or more people are killed.

    I have no problem with focusing on preventing massacres of innocents like these using weapons that the vast majority of people should never need to own.

  25. #625
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Tearful Gun Manufacturers Thankful They All Made It Out Of Massacre Safely

    WASHINGTON—Expressing their immense relief at their good fortune, the nation’s gun manufacturers tearfully told reporters Tuesday they were thankful to have made it out of the Orlando massacre safely.

    “It’s truly a miracle that all of us got through this okay,” said visibly distraught Colt’s Manufacturing CEO Dennis Veilleux, who frequently choked up while voicing his gra ude that U.S. firearms producers were now free from the danger posed by the mass shooting.

    “There was a point back there where I honestly feared the worst, and I had no idea if [Smith & Wesson CEO] James [Debney], [Bushmaster CEO] George [Kollitides], and everyone else would be all right. Now that this nightmare’s over, all I can do is thank God for keeping us out of harm’s way.”

    The gun manufacturers went on to praise the NRA for the courage and grit they displayed in quickly responding to such a traumatic crisis.

    http://www.theonion.com/article/tearful-gun-manufacturers-thankful-they-all-made-i-53133



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •