This is Blake's typical downward spiral that results from his initial premise being flawed because he's ignorant and lazy and doesn't understand the topic. He's a poor man's version of Chumpdumper.
Ex-Trump adviser dismisses church massacre: Why don’t we talk about the things the world cares about?
Corey Lewandowski, a former campaign manager and woman beater for President Donald Trump, on Saturday night downplayed the deadly shooting rampage inside a Texas church.
During an appearance on Fox News’ Watters’ World, Lewandowski attacked a reporter for asking Trump about gun restrictions in the days following the massacre.
“You know, when the president is overseas and he is just south of a madman, why don’t we actually talk about the things that the world cares about?” he said. “Which is containing that madman in North Korea.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/ex-trump-adviser-dismisses-church-massacre-why-dont-we-talk-about-the-things-the-world-cares-about/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
This is Blake's typical downward spiral that results from his initial premise being flawed because he's ignorant and lazy and doesn't understand the topic. He's a poor man's version of Chumpdumper.
I'm not. You're gay for even trying to go there. Your is like 1987.
A des ute man's version of chump, tbh. I had figured he was nothing but a sniper alt at first. Turns out he just is that lazy / unintelligent.
Dmc sticking with his false dilemma and melting down with ad hominems.
Par.
Calling people gay is like 1977
For something to be a false dilemma, there has to be other viable options. You don't know enough about the subject to illustrate any other options. It comes down to that choice: ban guns or don't.
Are you against banning guns?
"muh guns"
Fine. You're 1977.
I can remember when congress "banned" assault rifles that had "pistol grips" and "hand guards" and "flash hiders" going directly at civilian versions of the AK47. A month later container loads of MAK-90's were being unloaded in LA with thumbhole wood stocks and wood foregrips and threaded barrels with just thread protectors. Exactly the same gun with cosmetic concessions to get around the specifics of the bill. It was actually pretty funny
Then ban semiautomatic weapons and any aftermarket modification that convert to semiautomatic.
Are we going to be banning the govt. from having these weapons while we're at it?
No you dumb .![]()
Such weak ing arguments.![]()
Good idea; surrender to the government.
"dumb "![]()
From
to
You're on tilt got. Those are all completely different things.![]()
^^^
Triggered.
Do you have guns to fight the government?
You can see a scared mouse behind that screen.
I'll let you be.![]()
The viable option(s) being to ban high capacity mags and rapid fire guns to start.
If you want to dismiss that as an option then I'll just call you stupid and leave it at that.
I showed you that banning high capacity magazines did not do anything for the 10 years it was implemented. There's no such as a rapid fire gun. That doesn't exist anywhere in the firearm nomenclature. It's either a full auto, semi-auto or other. The other is bolt action, revolver, break barrel, etc... Shotguns have similar nomenclature however a full auto shotgun is hard to come by.
You can call me anything you like. It's not going to change the facts that you're gun ignorant but very opinionated just the same. You have the answer and don't even know the question.
Oh yeah all those conversions for bolt actions that make them semiauto, like a semiauto receiver and a different stock and barrel. Oh and a trigger group as well. That should convert it. Why would anyone want to convert to a gun you can buy legally cheaper than the one you're trying to convert, you ing idiot?
This is like watching re s finger paint in their own .
"CNN)An analysis performed for CNN found that states that have enacted magazine restrictions are associated with fewer mass shooting events.
"Whether a state has a large capacity ammunition magazine ban is the single best predictor of the mass shooting rate in that state, " said Michael Siegel, a community health science professor at Boston University, who conducted the analysis. These states are associated with a 63% lower rate of mass shootings, according to his analysis....."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...gas/index.html
muh guns
Mass shooting events are so rare that statistics regarding them are basically pointless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)