Reply With Quote
What does that have to do with what I said?
B2B, help me out here. Did I or did I not just show that Extra Stout doesn't know what he is talking about when it comes to the Egyptian story of Mut-em-usa ? He said it was a poor translation by someone named Acharya S, who I don't even know of.
I just showed him that the damn thing is accurate and was published in 1922 in a book, and I'm sure in other places too.
Yet somehow JoeChalupa still says I haven't proved 'jack squat' ?
Am I missing something here? I don't get it. what's your take?
What does that have to do with what I said?
Lol, ok.
I am going back to my original stance.
JoeChalupa is a troll who is using this thread as a playground
I'm bored enough to fight fire with fire.You've yet to prove jack squat.
You haven't proved jack squat yourself.
I fell like I've proven that Jesus was a load of horse . Christianity is the root of all evil.
You will never change my faith of that. NEVER. NEVER I TELL YOU. My religion says the burden of proof is on you. You have provided nothing. NOTHING.
/yelling/NOTHING/yelling/
meltingcheese/NOTHING/meltingjesus/
What ever calms your fear.Lol, ok.
I am going back to my original stance.
JoeChalupa is a troll who is using this thread as a playground
Like I've said all along and I've admitted that I cannot prove the existence of God but neither can you disprove it. Simple as that. You've not proven anything at all because of none of what you've posted is proof that Jesus Christ did not exist or is not the Son of God. NONE, NADA.
lol, joe. your trolling becomes obvious now :P
Acharya S is a bit of a loon who took the point you're trying to make and turned into a giant conspiracy theory far more reaching than any truth oriented advocate I or you have ever seen. She is easily citable because she's so extreme and people like us cite extremes to counter extremes.
I've already attempted to point out that she is a source of questionable credibility and that there are many many other more logical reasonable sources who echo similar stances. It fell on deaf ears.
There really isn't anything left to do here. They will never look reasonably at the situation. They're trained like super Nazi's that Tom Cruise couldn't even bring down.
The thing that always struck me as funny is that they always say that Jesus will return in this era...which has been cited for years from the Christians. So every time some whack job claims to be Jesus how do they know to ignore him. What if one of these crackpots were Jesus and he's returned as mortal man and everyone blew him off. Then Jesus would have to steal and rob people for food and shelter while living from cardboard box to cardboard box. Poor little unrecognized Jesus. His own people don't even acknowledge him. You guys should start paying attention Heyzues the homeless man.
haha disproving Jesus wasn't the son of God...
why don't we all start making stupid claims and that can't be disproven...like the flying spaghetti monster
I never set out to disprove god for the quadrillionth time. how many times do I have to say it.
I have proven there is no Jesus you ignored it. I proved it with my evidence the evidence seen by others who agree and the complete lack of evidence supporting his existence. So even if I believed there is a lack of evidence.
Ignore it. I don't care.
/yellingbabyjesus/YOU CAN NEVER BREAK MY FAITH IN NO JESUS. NEVER/yellingcryingbabyjesus/
or better yet we could all just jump into a 20 page thread and pretend we're up to speed.
And how many time do I have to tell you that you CANNOT prove that Jesus never existed. You simply cannot. You are ignoring very simple facts. Just because you believe the facts prove it to YOU doesn't make it reality. You simply cannot prove it. How may damn times do I have say it!!!
And how many time do I have to tell you that you CANNOT prove that Jesus existed. You simply cannot. You are ignoring very simple facts. Just because you believe the facts prove it to YOU doesn't make it reality. You simply cannot prove it. How may damn times do I have say it!!!And how many time do I have to tell you that you CANNOT prove that Jesus never existed. You simply cannot. You are ignoring very simple facts. Just because you believe the facts prove it to YOU doesn't make it reality. You simply cannot prove it. How may damn times do I have say it!!!
1) You know Jesus because of the Jesus mythology in the New Testament.
2) There is no historical account of Jesus -anywhere- outside of the Bible except ONE place by Josephus which was proven to be a forgery.
3) So therefore, if we prove that the Jesus mythology was just another form of Sun worship from a long line of Godmen just like Jesus, that pre-date Jesus, then we have proven he doesn't exist.
It's simple. Stop trolling
Threads like this are why I hate going into The Club. But for some reason I keep going in here.
Its too easy MH their eyes burn out.
I know man every thread here is 25 pages of lustful sins.
Oh, well. Believe and let live is my motto. I don't what's the motto with you guys but live long and prosper. You all can say I'm trolling, which I must I have been guilty of in the past but it doesn't bother me one bit. I'm no religious scholar but I'm very comfortable in my own beliefs and if you all want to call me stupid or ignorant for my beliefs than so be it.
I've already admitted that.And how many time do I have to tell you that you CANNOT prove that Jesus existed. You simply cannot. You are ignoring very simple facts. Just because you believe the facts prove it to YOU doesn't make it reality. You simply cannot prove it. How may damn times do I have say it!!!
You'd get through to these people if you just show them that Jesus was black. Prove that and you'll have a gaggle of newly converted non-Jesus believers on your hands.
I've never called you stupid or ignorant.
I've called you dishonest because I KNOW that the facts presented here and unsettling to you, yet you still don't want to admit it.
A lot has happened in biblical criticism and archaeology in the past 86 years to make that book out of date. We already covered the distinction between miraculous births and births by divine intervention on the one hand, and a virgin birth on the other. We also covered the mistranslations of the inscriptions at Luxor.
1922 was around the height of the liberal era. Liberals responded to the claims of modernism by simply stripping away all supernatural aspects of faith and reducing Jesus to a good moral teacher. Rough parallels to other legends of miraculous births were enough to make the point that one need not believe in such things that are nonsense to good sound reason.
A closer examination of the other legends finds that the biblical account is unique in that Mary not only conceived miraculously, but that she was virgo intacta. The Jesus account "one-ups" the other legends.
This is why, for example, Jane Schaberg, a more contemporary liberal feminist who makes the opposite argument about the virgin birth of Jesus -- that the uniqueness of Mary's being a virgin points to its fabrication by a patriarchal church that created an unattainable archetype in order to oppress women.
So in your eyes if I die and there is no written proof such as a birth certificate or death certificate then that is proof that I never existed? Without a paper, scroll, tablet, cave writing or something else I never walked this earth?
Stop trolling damnit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggF8iTa26UQ
thought yall might like this
Wrong again. Nothing that you've cut and pasted has unsettled me in the slightest bit. Not even close. I've told you again and again that you CANNOT prove anything and you've yet to admit it. You can make theories and show "facts" but that doesn't prove anything. Who is being ignorant?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
