Well, the Amare retort can be well, quite true. Now, you making it as reference... makes you even dumber.
This is just getting more and more incredible.
Look at the picture again. Do you see the front part of Bowen's foot? I don't, you know why? Because Amare's right foot was in front of his foot, well, either that, or the kick was so hard, Bowen kicked THROUGH his leg and implanted his shoe there.
And speaking of reading comprehension, BENEATH.
Fact is, there's not enough evidence there to support either argument.
Whether you're calling Bowen a thug, or defending him to the death, the real question is - who gives a ?
Whatever Amare was trying to accomplish, we won't know if it worked or not until after the series.
I am sorry if you ran out of things to defend the kick with and want us to stop defusing your absolute asinine statements.
Psssst, you can use my "stepping on a cricket on the court" one. I wont mind.
It looks to me like the front part of Bowen's foot is between Amare's feet and pointed upwards.
This is just getting more and more incredible.
Look at the picture again. Do you see the front part of Bowen's foot? I don't, you know why? Because Amare's right foot was in front of his foot, well, either that, or the kick was so hard, Bowen kicked THROUGH his leg and implanted his shoe there.
And speaking of reading comprehension, BENEATH.
I think it's remarkable, though, that Bowen could kick Amare before he left the ground and have that kick be substantial enough to affect Amare only on the way down. Amare doesn't appear to have lost his balance or suffered such brute force that it affected his ability to elevate. I guess maybe Bowen applied his patented 2 second delay to that kick.
Beneath, Beneath, Beneath! It means that Bowen's foot was BENEATH Amare's shoe, which also means that Bowen couldn't have kicked Amare in his heals.So you are lowering yourself to this? OK OK OK! We meant to say the BACK of the heel. Come on guys. Jesus christ do we have to sing it?
My heel is connected to my... what? guess... ACHILLES!
I would have drawn you a diagram, but I thought the picture was clearer, and if you still can't see it from the picture, there is just no way you can see it with anything else.
This is just getting more and more incredible.
Look at the picture again. Do you see the front part of Bowen's foot? I don't, you know why? Because Amare's right foot was in front of his foot, well, either that, or the kick was so hard, Bowen kicked THROUGH his leg and implanted his shoe there.
And speaking of reading comprehension, BENEATH.
HOLY are you ing kidding me...look on amares FAR foot the left one i believe...BOWENS FOOT IS DIRECTLY ON AMARES HEEL...
take a close look cause bowenst FRONT FOOT IS IN CLEAR PLAIN SIGHT.
If Bowen is as dirty and has such a long record of injuring other players as some are claiming, and if he tried to injure Stoudemire has some are claiming, then why is Amare still up and walking around?
Seems like, if Bruce has such a long record of injuring players, as some claim, Stoudemire should just now be coming out of surgery, being Bowen's latest victim and all
You really are the same person who preached reading comprehension? Read the whole post.
Now, you making it as reference... makes you even dumber.
Lol, jesus man. That was a good one!
Bowen 'kick' not under review by: Marc Stein
posted: Friday, May 11, 2007 | Feedback | Print Entry
filed under: Phoenix Suns, San Antonio Spurs
Checked with the league office Friday to get their position on the latest "dirty" claim against Bruce Bowen.
The claim, in this instance, has been dismissed.
No matter how much debate this generates in the media, Bowen is not under review for what Amare Stoudemire contends was an intentional kick to the back of his leg on a fourth-quarter dunk in Tuesday night's Game 2.
it doesnt matter what either party thinks, Bowen will be playing. End of story
1. Grow up
2. Get some new material. Take my word for it, you're not HALF as clever as you think you are.
3. Give up the argument. Why are you defending Bowen's "intent"? Since you're the one that brought up mind reading, how can you say with certainty that Bowen didn't try to get away with something?
Answer: you can't.
So stop padding your post count.
Comprehension? You have having trouble with goddamn PICTURE! lol
And no I wasn't the one that was preaching about reading comprehension. I just kinda jumped in the debate.
Good luck with that picture by the way
BLIND MUCH?
Look at the video again, Amare's right leg went up after he dunked the ball. So why would his right leg bounce from Bowen's "kick" with a delay of a second, after Bowen kicked him in his left leg?
BTW, that picture either shows Bowen's foot was between Amare's left and right left, or it shows Bowen kicked through Amare's right leg and dented left. I tend to believe the earlier explanation.
Whew! Where did I EVER talk about Bowen's intent.
I clearly stated that there never was a kick.
And thanks for the lecture, I need lessons how to stick my foot in my mouth from the master.
give it up you are really reaching now.
This should be prosecuted as a hate crime!!!!*
*Because I do think the entire Phoenix team is a little gay.....
Look at the video again, at the 36 to 37 second mark
BLIND MUCH?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc4yz__akIU
The talk has been Bowen kicking Amare's right leg and caused it to bounce up. The picture showed that never happened.
The video showed that Bowen's foot was half a feet away from Amare's left heel.
You're worse than my 2 year old.
NBA did not see anything that warranted punishment.
The End.
Sorry my lord, I am at work and tabbing back and forth. It will not happen again sir!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
