"The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday."
http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...ed-dnc-servers
You act as if the investigation just started a month ago. Have you already forgotten how long the Trump team was under surveillance and when this all started?
Is there actually any indication the Trump team got this information? Or is it some dude on twitter throwing against the wall?
US officials have leaked it to TIME.. This is what they are looking at. Newly discovered.
So you don't have evidence. Got it.
All I see is a URL.
Did you mean to explain this, or just point a link and make me do all the work, per par?
Why only leak half the story then?
There will be reports that Team trump paid the hackers.
It's much more than the bull theory you cooked up in defense of the DNC.
Mueller. To build an airtight case, you give Team Trump no heads up that you know it they have that information.
It's coming from djohn...did you really need to ask these questions?
Did you post what you think cons utes evidence?
Holy Trump admitting he has no tapes of Comey. Too bad Comey can't say the same about you pleighboi.
Statements from the head of the FBI and DHS are good enough for me. What evidence do you have to support your theory the DNC did not deny access?
ing dumbass es trying to intimidate a witness
Claiming he had tapes got Comey to testify that he told Trump he was never under investigation. By the way where are Comey's so called memos? Did the professor actually have them and turn them over or was it all bull ?
Claiming he had tapes of Comey was a threat to try and get Comey not to testify you stupid sack of .
So statements of fact from the head of the FBI and DHS cons ute sufficient evidence for you.
The DNC says they didn't deny requests.
As noted before, it is entirely conceivable that both sides are telling the truth as they see it. This is what I think actually happened (i.e. a communication muddle with both sides thinking one thing, but factually wrong in some way), based on the evidence for (statements by officials) and against (statements by officials).
Feel free to present any evidence you have that either party is actively lying. Sufficient evidence would be actual emails, or copies of letters.
Unless, of course you are applying different standards of evidence when it comes to believing Democrats.
Are you applying different standards of evidence?
LOL
So since statements of fact from the head of the FBI and DHS cons ute sufficient evidence, we can now safely conclude that Russia did, in fact attempt to hack into voting systems.Former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson testified before the House Intelligence Committee Wednesday that to his knowledge, Russia did not alter vote tallies or ballots in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
The question now remains, what will the Trump administration do about it?
What should they do about it?
Are you ok with your president openly lying about this? Or to the American people?
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
