Reply With Quote
Guess the physical should have been done by a minority woman
Nothing is good enough for liberals
You have something against Jewish physicians?
physical was conducted by Dr. Harold N. Bornstein,
Guess the physical should have been done by a minority woman
Nothing is good enough for liberals
no, bigot, I don't. Bornstein is a clown who wrote a clown letter for Trash.
Probably something showed up from eating McDonald's and KFC for lunch. I doubt he was eating that for lunch before the campaign started.
Nate Silver NateSilver538
It's not totally clear how much Clinton's "bad weekend" affected the polls. But clear Trump still gaining ground
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2016/09/1...-donald-trump/ to many trump signs so he can get fine?
Trump Shoots Himself In The Foot As Physical Revealed To Be A Total Sham
Donald Trump has created a whole new scandal for himself as
his "physical" was nothing more than a one-page review released by the same oddball doctor who wrote Trump's typo-filled medical letter.
Trump went on the Republican Dr. Oz’s show, released a one-page review from the same quack
who isn’t an internist
and is a friend, and thinks that this passes for medical transparency.
Donald Trump has managed to keep the questions about why he won’t release his medical records, or go to an internist instead of a friend for his physicals alive.
Once again, Trump tried to con his way out of transparency, but this time, the media and the American people aren’t buying it.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/09/...iticus+USA+%29
Holy . Trash takes America to be as ignorant, stupid, gullible as his supporters are!
Why Democrats in Western Pennsylvania Are Voting Trump
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...-trump/499577/
guess democrats are getting fooled to boutons!
Economist Says Trump’s Childcare Plan ‘Full of Holes’ and ‘Makes Absolutely No Sense’
"This is a policy which, if you had spent more than ten minutes working on it, you would realize that there were huge holes. But they...didn't spend that"
Hillary Clinton’s senior policy adviser, Maya Harris, said Trump’s vaunted child care plan as “half-baked,” and she is far from alone: The chief economist for the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Austen Goolsbee of the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, took to Fox News’ The Kelly File to say of Trump’s plan,
“This is a policy which, if you had spent more than ten minutes working on it, you would realize that there were huge holes. But they apparently didn’t spend that.
So first, it’s not a maternity leave policy that should be called “paid maternity leave.”
It’s not based on what your income was.
In many states, the maximum’s going to be over $1,000 a month.
And second, who pays for it are the newly unemployed.
He’s taking the money out of unemployment insurance and diverting it to the maternity leave.
It absolutely makes no sense.”
Speaking in Pennsylvania, Trump claimed of his so-called “Child Care Affordability Plan,” that, “It’s pro-family, it’s pro-child, it’s pro-worker.
These are the people we have to take care of,” even though it really only takes care of people making more than $500K/year.
His daughter Ivanka, who has nothing in common with most women but is supposed to be Trump’s access to women voters, said “we need to create policies that champion all parents” but this isn’t one of those policies; some parents are to be championed more than others.
It’s not all Ivanka’s fault.
As Libby Nelson over at Vox explains, “Trump’s plan shows his daughter’s influence” but it also shows “his disinterest in policy details.”
As Vivien Labaton, co-executive director of the nonpartisan Make It Work Action (MIWA), put it,“His childcare proposal is really designed for the Ivanka Trump’s of the country than the working families who need help.”
Trump says Clinton has no plan.
His plan claims in boldface letters and baldfaced lies, “Donald J. Trump’s Plan Is More Complete Than Hillary Clinton’s Plan.”
But it’s not.
As tweeted by the Clinton campaign’s The Briefing, “Like most of Trump’s plans, the details of his paid leave proposal aren’t serious.”
If you are beginning to get the feeling that you’re living through a television reality series about somebody campaigning for president, television writers are usually better at creating a believable setting, and more realistic policy proposals.
Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC)
This is true: you can have a job and have no better child care options than you do now.
You can tell she’s a member of Paul Ryan’s all-talk-no-action House of Representatives.In every respect, Donald Trump’s child care plan falls short.
Not only compared to Hillary Clinton’s much more well-thought-out plan, but just plain short, in that it isn’t designed to help all Americans.
Just the Ivanka Trumps of the world.
White nationalist Lou Dobbs is really happy Ivanka Trump will get access to child care.
He is so happy that he says of Trump’s child care plan that “@realDonaldTrump seems a candidate of destiny.”
Trump’s plan absolutely makes no sense, said Austen Goolsbee, and he is right.
Like so much else about the Trump campaign, it’s all sleight of hand, a con job to fool the gullible into casting a vote for him.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/09/...iticus+USA+%29
And the Trash supporters go wild!
cnn last night said both plans had holes in them with how to pay for it
OUCH the truth hurts
it is the first time a republican president candidate atleast is trying to address the issue
it also has to get thru congress
That's some goofball partisan there...Don't like what the doctor says just claim he isn't a good doctor and Boukakki gobbles it up.
Trump’s Blue Collar Base Wants More Jobs
A national CNN/ORC poll released last week showed that 68 percent of likely voters who are white and without a college education support Trump,
while 24 percent support Clinton.
Among college-educated whites, 49 percent chose Clinton in the poll, and 36 percent chose Trump.
As FiveThirtyEight’s Harry Enten has written, if these trends hold,
Trump would become the first Republican presidential candidate to lose the white college-educated vote in 60 years.
A Quinnipiac University poll of Ohio released last week shows Trump leading Clinton by 41 to 37 in the state, with Libertarian Gary Johnson getting 14 percent and Jill Stein of the Green Party at 4 percent.
Among non-college-educated whites in the state, Trump leads Clinton 51-27.
“America, under a Trump presidency, I imagine we’re going to restore our standing in the world,”
“The economy — to me, it’s very sad. We’ve had so many people leave the workforce. They’re not even being counted.”
He added: “It’s time to take the chains off of businesses.
We are going in such the opposite way we should be with regulations,
worrying about every little PC thing that comes along.
I think Donald Trump, being a businessman, he understands that more than anybody.
Unleash the economy.”
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...-better-times/
Holeee . These Trash supporters are so ing stupid, ignorant, totally misinformed by Repugs/VRWC as to what their problems are,
and totally conned, suckered by (Repug/VRWC/conservative-establishment ideology-compatible) Trash as the solution!
The odd twists and turns of Trump’s medical information
The original plan, according to the Republican candidate himself, was to release “very detailed” information about his health “this week,” following a physical exam Trump underwent last week. The vow was itself something of a reversal: the only information Americans have seen about Trump’s health to date was a laughable letter from the candidate’s gastroenterologist, Dr. Harold Bornstein, which the physician concedes was thrown together in five minutes without careful consideration, and which included language the doctor himself did not take seriously.
Yesterday, however, we were told Trump would discuss the results of last week’s physical on Dr. Oz’s television show
– a curious choice given Oz’s controversial background and a reversal from the campaign’s previous position – as part of what the host described yesterday as a “no-holds-barred conversation.”
Oz added, however, that Trump would control the release of the information and
the host wouldn’t ask any questions that the candidate “doesn’t want to have answered.”
On a related note, Oz conceded he would do this interview despite having no direct communications with the doctor who actually did the physical exam.
This morning, the Trump campaign said the entire plan had been changed and the candidate wouldn’t release any medical records through Dr. Oz’s show.
The GOP candidate would have a conversation about general well-being,
A couple of hours later, the plan changed again.
After a whiplash-inducing morning of mixed messages, Donald J. Trump on Wednesday gave a small window into some of the results from his most recent physical examination in a taped appearance with the television celebrity Dr. Mehmet Oz.
The quick run-through
doctor (Oz?) to read from a piece of paper,
came after the Republican presidential nominee’s aides had said he would, and then that
he wouldn’t, broach the topic with the celebrity doctor on the “Dr. Oz Show.”
According to CNN’s report,
Trump’s “surprise” disclosure was “a one-page summary of the physical exam he underwent last week.”
The physical, the CNN piece added, was conducted by – wait for it – Dr. Harold Bornstein.
Yes, that’s the same quirky gastroenterologist who wrote the ridiculous letter about Trump’s “astonishingly excellent” health.
We don’t yet have additional details about exactly what was said on the syndicated program because it was taped this morning for broadcast tomorrow.
All of this, incidentally,
comes against a backdrop in which Trump was intensely interested in Hillary Clinton’s health,
right up until she got pneumonia,
at which point Trump curiously changed the subject and
his campaign manager began emphasizing the importance of medical privacy.
In an election filled with strange spectacles, can anything top Trump’s bizarre handling of his personal medical information?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-odd-twists-and-turns-trumps-medical-information?cid=sm_fb_maddow
holy ing ! you Trash supporters!
Here's Trash yet again espousing another Repug establishment strategy: destroy, privatize public education
Another Unrealistic Trump Policy Proposal: Homeschool Vouchers
Trump recently proposed billions in spending to allow the nation’s poorest students to leave public schools and enroll elsewhere, including by using homeschooling. Except the plan won’t work for the poorest students.
The $20 billion in federal funds would be available only to what he says are 11 million children living in poverty who are also “trapped in failing schools.” Families will be eligible for vouchers to send their children to charter, magnet or even private religious schools. Last Friday, he announced the policy would include homeschooling as well.
“School choice is at the center of this civil rights agenda, and my goal is to provide every single inner-city child in America that is trapped in a failing government school the freedom to attend the school of their choice,” he said at a conservative voters conference.
“School choice also means that parents can homeschool their children. Hundred percent.”
But there’s one problem with Trump’s homeschooling plan: Impoverished homeschoolers mostly don’t exist.
“Ideologically speaking, this is significant, but practically very few students will use this money to homeschool,”
said Milton Gaither, an education professor at Messiah College. Gaither saw the announcement as a gesture to conservative Christians instead of an actual plan for poor families.
“I don’t see a mass movement of the nation’s poor applying for federal funding so they can educate their children themselves.”
https://www.propublica.org/article/a...ent=1473879695
yep, poor homes need the mother to go out and work.
It's the better off homes that can afford the mother not earning
And the women of poor homes may not be educationally, intellectually capable of teaching home schooling.
Boukaki, do you thing poor people are too stupid to home school their kids?
I think most poor homes don't value education (we heard the Trash Latino reach out guy trashing his own ethnic group), and mostly not educated through HS, if that. Parents unemployed or employed in low-wage jobs. cycle of poverty and all that
He could be a fatbol player
CROFL 267 is slightly overweight for someone 6'2" according to Dr Oz? So he really is a Republican bag like boutons was saying?
Did Dr Oz prescribe him a bunch of bull supplements like he always hypes up as miracle cures on his show?
LOL what a bigot. So Boukaki says poor people are stupid because they don't value education.
Another "deal" by Crooked Trash
REVEALED: Trump exploited ‘broken system’ he complains about to get hotel built near White House
It appears now that, once again, the Trump Organization took advantage of that “broken system” when working to secure the deal for the new Washington Trump property. According to a report from the “Daily Beast,” Trump and his children all donated the maximum amount of money they could to the Washington mayor and members of Congress, including Democrats, who all supported Trump’s property.
The federal government announced that Trump won the contract in February of 2012 for the Old Post Office Pavilion building, and not long after money began flowing into the campaign war chests of the politicians who helped make it happen. Both Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton and Mayor Muriel Bowser scored campaign contributions from the Trump family.
The Trump family is known for giving to Democrats and Republicans, particularly in New York and Florida, but until recently they weren’t investors in Washington, D.C. political campaigns. It doesn’t take a campaign finance expert to explain that the donations look bad.
“There’s no evidence of anything illegal about it,” Lawrence Noble of the Campaign Legal Center told The Daily Beast. “The closer you are to doing something specifically for somebody the more it raises ethical questions.”
Ivanka Trump, who was tasked with managing the project, first contributed $2500 to Norton’s campaign in June 2012, just four months after the deal for the hotel was announced. She contributed the maximum again in the next election cycle.
Norton released a statement in June 2013 saying she has worked for 15 years to find a developer for the Old Post Office. In 2008, the statement explains that Norton passed a bill, the Old Post Office Development Act, which would require the General Services Administration to proceed with redevelopment of the property. She also celebrated Ivanka Trump for her work on the project and said, “It has been my pleasure to have the rare opportunity to work with a major developer who happens to be a remarkable young woman.”
“Norton has spoken with Ivanka Trump, who leads the project, several times and today also spoke with Donald Trump,” the statement also says.
Just three weeks after releasing that statement, a $2,600 check came in from Donald Trump for Norton’s campaign.
“It is not unusual for businesses who build in the national capital region to contribute to Members of Congress,” communications director Benjamin Fritsch said. “Congresswoman Norton was at the groundbreaking because of her role as the sponsor of the Old Post Office bill.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/09/reve...e+Raw+Story%29
not unusual? nope, because politics is totally corrupted by BigMoney who gets what they pay for, while citizens get nothing. See the Princeton study that proves that situation.
Your words, Boo.
my words are true, but they are statements of facts about the cultures of poor people, which makes multi-generational poverty so damn hard to alleviate, NOT bigotry by me.
Your words, Boo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
