Reply With Quote
Do those domino's have solid steel beams running through them?
I'm not sure what is worst. your lame 4th grade nick at night type example or your truck stop foul mouth.
And you guys wonder why the posters with real Knowledge like me stop responding.
Why couldn't "they" have used Iraqis?
...this forum is proof one that most Americans don't know the difference between a Saudi, Pakistani, Afghani, Kuwati, or Indian for that matter....all they know is that Muslims attacked the WTC and we need to kill the whole bunch of them.
The rest is up to the wing-nut media.
Do those domino's have solid steel beams running through them?
I'm not sure what is worst. your lame 4th grade nick at night type example or your truck stop foul mouth.
And you guys wonder why the posters with real Knowledge like me stop responding.
Some of you are just plain dumbasses.
It is clear planes hit the towers, saying otherwise is completely dishonest, i mean WTF, there was live footage of the planes hitting.
That's the funniest thing you've ever posted.
^ his is the first time you've told the truth.
So what really happened on 9/11, mouse?
Has anyone here seen this film?
Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle stick.
Answer the question.
Many Americans lost their lives.
The problem with you Mr, Dumper and your Red Bull induced kool-aid drinking followers fail to understand is that there is a large group of Americans and people from around the world that notice things don't add up.
It's like finding a wine bottle in your car and no one admits they used your car. You want answers, Is it wrong for others to have doubts and ask for answers?
well according to this forum it is. And if you question anything about 9/11 you have a tin foil cap on your head. So with that said I will limit my comments to those I see are able to digest my vast cache of mental capacity. And to be honest Mr. Dumper your not on that list.
Coward.
Maybe you would like if I meet you in a local lounge so we can arm wrestle to see who is right,
Thank you for proving my point.
I understand that perfectly, it's just that none of them have come up with any plausible alternative to the conventionally accepted story in five years.No, it's more like having a plane hit the Pentagon and trying to tell people it was a cruise missle shot by a Jew to get an insurance claim to pay $10 million a month to rent a hole in the ground.It's like finding a wine bottle in your car and no one admits they used your car. You want answers, Is it wrong for others to have doubts and ask for answers?
Maybe you could tell me what you think really happened on 9/11.
Nice job sidestepping the questions conspiracy theorists.
You all would make excellent politicians.
Conspiracy theorists tend to believe in multiple conspiracies. Check all that apply?
JFK?
The moon?
New World Order?
Freemasons?
AIDS?
Illuminati?
Oklahoma City bombing?
TWA Flight 800?
Global Warming?
Still waiting to hear the logistics of keeping a conspiracy this massive a total secret for 6 years.
Still waiting.
I expect the question will be sidestepped. Again.
JFK? - big yes
The moon? - no
New World Order? - yes
Freemasons? - eh,
AIDS? - no
Illuminati? - possibly: but you'll never prove it
Oklahoma City bombing? - yes, more than meets the eye.
TWA Flight 800? - possibly, but not a big conspiracy
Global Warming? - big yes, CO2 levels = global warming
bigfoot? No
UfOs? possibly
Loch Ness? Why not?
Chubacacra? No
Any others?
Ancient Chinese secret?Still waiting to hear the logistics of keeping a conspiracy this massive a total secret for 6 years.
Still waiting.
I expect the question will be sidestepped. Again.
Really, the Bush Adminstration has sealed, national securied, and classified on a need-to- know-bases so much of the physical evidence it is difficult to prove 911 even happened much less how it happened. Like I said, maybe in a few years, once the Neocons are crucified for getting us into a war with Iran, we'll know more about what happened, or didn't happen on 911.
Nice job of not reading one thing I have ever posted in this topic. This forum must have some of the most ignorant people I have ever come across.
What part do you not get about others and myself who want to know why TWC buildings came down so fast,What does that have to do with Conspiracy? It's a matter of science.
And who said anything about massive control of keeping a secret? What secret? Two large buildings fell. what is so top secret about that?
Do you actually read topics before your fingers start typing? This person is a perfect example why this topic will never go any further in my opinion. And It's down right scary to think some of you may actually have kids on this planet.
I'm with you on that Mouse, but a missile hitting the Pentagon? Common.What part do you not get about others and myself who want to know why TWC buildings came down so fast,What does that have to do with Conspiracy? It's a matter of science.
And who said anything about massive control of keeping a secret? What secret? Two large buildings fell. what is so top secret about that?
Then why not show us the video from the gas station camera and the near by HWY cam and the hotel roof top camera? Wouldn't that kill all this conspiracy bull ?
Why show a few stills from a camera that has the wrong date on it anyway? You would think these so called FBI agents would get the date right when releasing the pictures. And why would the simpleminded asshats in this forum try to tell me that the camera was a still camera so it only had 5 frames and yet it had a shutter speed set fast enough to catch the 5 frames of the blast?
Who would mount a camera that goes off every 3 seconds? you know how much film you would need when you could just have a digital recording in real time.? Are you trying to tell me the local 711 convenient store has better video surveillance than the United state Pentagon? How much bull do you guys think I can read on a daily basis?
And why do the Igmo's in this topic keep talking about how the so called plane hit the pentagon so fast that it disintegrated on impact not leaving any black box luggage ,seats, plane parts, and blood. But yet when you push the issue they keep showing that same burned up body of some maintenance worker they found,
If that man was actually on this so called passenger airliner why did his body out of all the passengers magical survive? was the man made of Teflon? Or did he have on clothes with extra starch that shielded him from the fuel and heat and impact. I may come back later to this topic to see if anyone with at least a 11th grade education has responded. And I would appreciate if many of you would leave to obvious bull come backs to yourselves.
It really doesn't matter what I say to folks in here most of you argue just for the sake of arguing. You really don't want to learn a dam thing.
Has he sealed, secured, and classified the thousands of eye witnesses and investigators that participated?Ancient Chinese secret?
Really, the Bush Adminstration has sealed, national securied, and classified on a need-to- know-bases so much of the physical evidence it is difficult to prove 911 even happened much less how it happened. Like I said, maybe in a few years, once the Neocons are crucified for getting us into a war with Iran, we'll know more about what happened, or didn't happen on 911.
Seriously, if the New York Times can get NSA secrets, you don't think there's at least one, of the probably thousands that would have had to be involved in such a conspiracy, that would talk to them on deep background?
Sorry, can't have it both ways. This is a leaky ship or it's air tight.
They don't want to have to pay out $16 million per tape like they did to Zapruder for starters.Then why not show us the video from the gas station camera and the near by HWY cam and the hotel roof top camera?Because that's the camera that took the pictures from the Pentagon.Why show a few stills from a camera that has the wrong date on it anyway?It's a security camera. They don't used Cinemascope or HDtv for security cameras.And why would the simpleminded asshats in this forum try to tell me that the camera was a still camera so it only had 5 frames and yet it had a shutter speed set fast enough to catch the 5 frames of the blast?What does that even mean? The frame rate was bewteen 5-10 frames per second, like any other security camera.Who would mount a camera that goes off every 3 seconds?I wouldn't call being completely carbonized surviving.If that man was actually on this so called passenger airliner why did his body out of all the passengers magical survive?What do you think really happened on 9/11?It really doesn't matter what I say to folks in here most of you argue just for the sake of arguing. You really don't want to learn a dam thing.
It only stands to reason that they would make that kind of simple mistake after pulling off a perfectly executed cruise missle strike on the Pentagon while making all the eyewitnesses somehow think it was an American Airlines 757.
Those tapes where taken as evidence there is no need to have to pay anyone to show the video. If that was the case you would never have any footage on Americas most wanted or any other event the FBI was involved in.
Your really putting a spin on all this.
Oops I'm sorry it's just the Pentagon. maybe if they sold cigarettes they could get a batter camera. You just said so yourself it was a Security camera. What kind of security wants to have criminals slipping by getting away with stealing car radios if they can only catch maybe the back of their heads every few seconds?Because that's the camera that took the pictures from the Pentagon.It's a security camera. They don't used Cinemascope or HDtv for security cameras.
why would of all the places on earth they choose the pentagon to have the worst security than Wall mart? My GOD do you still put your lose teeth under your pillow at night?
Because if you notice the frames they released just so happen to only show the impact no frames that would show what really hit the pentagon were ever shown how convenient on their part to leave out the most important frame. That is one bad ass camera. where can I purchase one? I may want to see my apartment after it was robbed.What does that even mean? The frame rate was bewteen 5-10 frames per second, like any other security camera.
What I think really happened after responding to this topic is? 9/11 gave you a life to spend on the PC asking the same questions.What do you think really happened on 9/11?
Yep, the problem with the cruise missile theory is the witnesses, the plane hitting light-poles on the highway and also striking a big generator or something with one of its engines before hitting the Pentagon.It only stands to reason that they would make that kind of simple mistake after pulling off a perfectly executed cruise missle strike on the Pentagon while making all the eyewitnesses somehow think it was an American Airlines 757.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
