The planes definitely were not commandeered by remote control. If you even entertain that thought, we will be paying you a visit.
The planes definitely were not commandeered by remote control. If you even entertain that thought, we will be paying you a visit.
And this is relevant how??
Your opinion isn't relevant? That's a fantastic argument.
well thats not much of a theory, you mean the 911 Commission Report?
You've already heard my opinion. I'm undecided. But I also don't think a person needs to have an answer to be skeptical of what happened. And that's why your question is not relevant.
It's what I believe. It does a good enough job of explaining the events. What theory explains it better?
just seemed too simple, left stuff out, I would like to research your theory, you mean the 911 Commission Report?
Sorry, I happen to think your opinion is relevant for this conversation. I apologize for ever considering it.
I think the 9/11 commission was far from comprehensive, but I haven't seen anyone piece together all the events with a different theory that would make me doubt its basic conclusions.
Everything respectable I've read and heard outside of that supports it pretty well.
No. What you are doing is asking the same question over and over to people that don't agree with you or are skeptical. It's a round about way of saying that if you don't have a better answer than your opinion doesn't count. When in reality that's not how things work.
And do you have to see a better theory to make you doubt the 9/11 commission? Or can you just see the holes in the report and decide for yourself that it is possible and maybe even likely that more was known before hand than what was let on?
Because I want to hear something that would convince me to not believe the conventional story.What you are doing is asking the same question over and over to people that don't agree with you or are skeptical.It's a roundabout way of saying I'm amazed that there isn't one comprehensive alternate theory out there worth hearing from any of you?It's a round about way of saying that if you don't have a better answer than your opinion doesn't count.How do things work? What have you done to make sure your skepticisms are relieved? Does this really matter to you at all?When in reality that's not how things work.
The basic conclusions? Yes.As I said, there are volumes and volumes of well-researched and sourced work independent of the commission report that supports it.Or can you just see the holes in the report and decide for yourself that it is possible and maybe even likely that more was known before hand than what was let on?
I don't understand either of these questions. What exactly are you trying to ask?
You are skeptical, but do you really give a about finding out anything else about 9/11?
Well then go ahead and believe whatever the government spoon feeds you.
And there are also volumes and volumes of other well-researched work that doesn't agree with it. And that is why I am undecided.
Like what? Loose Change or In Plane Sight?![]()
I never thought I'd see the day when Chump gets ripped as a BushCo apologist.
![]()
And you keep posting links to music videos in the Political Forum.
I have yet to see anything that's well-researched coming from an objective, respectable source.And there are also volumes and volumes of other well-researched work that doesn't agree with it. And that is why I am undecided.
Yes I do and that's why I want impeachment hearings and nothing less. There are many things that Bush and his buddies have done that I am upset about and do give a about. Bush has more to answer for than just what he knew about 9/11. He also has to answer for which reasons he used for going to war that he knew were lies. And he did knowingly use lies to go to war.
And what have you done to bring this about?Yes I do and that's why I want impeachment hearings and nothing less.
And what are your thoughts about both of those?
He answered enough about 911!, with Cheney by his side... and we'll never know what he said... and he didnt take an oath...Bush has more to answer for than just what he knew about 9/11
I think they are hack jobs that are full of easily disproved lies.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)