McDonald: Spurs go off the radar with Hill

[K-State Spur]

Fact of the matter is he most likely would have been there at 45

Why? Because the mock drafts said so?

Most of them had Giddens lasting until almost the end of the draft, and he went at #30.

[K-State Spur]

Why take this guy over Chalmers? Not sayin' it was a bad move, but wasn't Chalmers the best PG available at that point?

There are quite a few things to like about Chalmers' game. But there are also LEGITIMATE questions as to whether he will ever be able to succeed at the PG spot. The answer to those questions in college was 'no.'

[K-State Spur]

no need to even think of bringing vaugn back much less say he is still gonna compete as tonys backup

you planning on going with just 2 PGs this year? vaughn's a nice insurance policy as a third guy.

[ManuTastic]

There are quite a few things to like about Chalmers' game. But there are also LEGITIMATE questions as to whether he will ever be able to succeed at the PG spot. The answer to those questions in college was 'no.'

What are the questions specifically?

[AFBlue]

The le says "Spurs go off radar", but the spinsters say "We weren't sure he'd be there"....somewhat contradictory. Sadly, I side with the writer.

I think the Spurs could've traded into the second round and signed him to a non-guaranteed contract.

Guess we'll see if he's worth it...

[Mr. Body]

The le says "Spurs go off radar", but the spinsters say "We weren't sure he'd be there"....somewhat contradictory. Sadly, I side with the writer.

I think the Spurs could've traded into the second round and signed him to a non-guaranteed contract.

Guess we'll see if he's worth it...

100%