Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 74 of 74
  1. #51
    Believe. wisnub's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    739
    this kind of talk never ends...... Mavs is no longer a rival, since Devin left. I suppose Diop left too?? You may not agree with me, but judging these 2 years..i got nothing more to say.... Of course Mavs fans will defend their team as much as we do...

  2. #52
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    I didn't say anything about who has the bigger trophy case. The Spurs haven't had to go through the Mavs to get their last two les. The Mavs have owned the Spurs in that period of time. So I was just asking how it is possible that the Spurs "own" the Mavs.

    I should have figured logic is not your strong suit.
    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DAL/2007.html
    Playoffs:
    Lost NBA Western Conference First Round (4-2) versus Golden State Warriors


    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DAL/2008.html
    Playoffs:
    Lost NBA Western Conference First Round (4-1) versus New Orleans Hornets


    Yeah, it's somehow the Spurs' fault that they haven't been meeting the Mavs in the playoffs and I'm the one with a logic deficiency. I certainly hope the "ownage" continues as it has the past couple of years.
    Last edited by Obstructed_View; 07-27-2008 at 06:58 AM. Reason: forgot to add a :lol

  3. #53
    Speeding! Sissiborgo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    836
    true

  4. #54
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    What happened?the last two le runs
    The Spurs have a bigger trophy case. I can count. By the same token, the Warriors have owned the Mavs, but the Mavs have had more league-wide success. Warriors:Mavs as Mavs:Spurs.

    Tell me again how the Spurs have "owned" the Mavs the last three years?

  5. #55
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DAL/2007.html
    Playoffs:
    Lost NBA Western Conference First Round (4-2) versus Golden State Warriors


    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DAL/2008.html
    Playoffs:
    Lost NBA Western Conference First Round (4-1) versus New Orleans Hornets


    Yeah, it's somehow the Spurs' fault that they haven't been meeting the Mavs in the playoffs and I'm the one with a logic deficiency. I certainly hope the "ownage" continues as it has the past couple of years.
    The Warriors have owned the Mavs, but the Mavs have had more league-wide success. The Mavs have owned the Spurs, but the Spurs have had more league-wide success. Do you know what ownage really even means? It means head to head. I think you may be confusing us with that team in the desert that wears purple and orange. Arrogance and ignorance makes for a laughable combination.

    OV, you are a typical Spurs fan: You play the four rings card when it doesn't apply and when you're losing an argument. Congratulations on your team's sustained excellence and success. Doesn't mean you have a ing clue what you're talking about. Nice try, Charlie Gordon.
    Last edited by Findog; 07-27-2008 at 02:58 PM.

  6. #56
    Believe. jay014's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    479
    but the Mavs have had more league-wide success. Warriors:Mavs as Mavs:Spurs.
    Mavs can have their league wide success during the regular season. I'd rather have it in the post season. It shows something.

  7. #57
    Believe. jayc23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    442
    Go Cubs!!!!.. Cuban!!!

  8. #58
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    The Warriors have owned the Mavs, but the Mavs have had more league-wide success. The Mavs have owned the Spurs, but the Spurs have had more league-wide success. Do you know what ownage really even means? It means head to head. I think you may be confusing us with that team in the desert that wears purple and orange. Arrogance and ignorance makes for a laughable combination.

    OV, you are a typical Spurs fan: You play the four rings card when it doesn't apply and when you're losing an argument. Congratulations on your team's sustained excellence and success. Doesn't mean you have a ing clue what you're talking about. Nice try, Charlie Gordon.
    Explain to me where the ownage is:


    Spurs vs Mavs since 2000 (full season):
    Total games head to head
    Spurs 31- Mavs 23
    Playoff games head to head
    Spurs 11 - Mavs 7
    Playoff series
    Spurs 2 - Mavs 1
    Division les
    Spurs 5 - Mavs 1
    Championships*
    Spurs 3 - Mavs 0

    It's really nice that you attempted to re-frame the conversation only to cover a time frame where the Mavs are preceived to have done well. Let's look into that one a little deeper, shall we?

    Since 2005-2006 ("the OWNAGE era")
    Total games head to head
    Spurs 9 - Mavs 10
    Playoff games head to head
    Spurs 3 - Mavs 4
    Playoff series
    Spurs 0 - Mavs 1
    Division les
    Spurs 1 - Mavs 1
    Championships*
    Spurs 1 - Mavs 0

    Since the teams appear to have an even record in the regular season during your cherry-picked timeframe, the only difference seems to be that one playoff series, which is basically overtime of game seven. So the Mavs beat the Spurs in a five minute stretch and suddenly they are the same caliber team as the Spurs. Puh ing lease. And I'm not sure how the Mavs have had more league wide success than the Warriors; the Warriors have been to the second round in the last two seasons. The Mavs basically had one good year and suddenly that makes them superior to everyone else. Ridiculous as usual from you.


    * championships "don't apply" because fans of teams that have never won one seem to think it's not a fair comparison of team success.

  9. #59
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Explain to me where the ownage is:


    Spurs vs Mavs since 2000 (full season):
    Total games head to head
    Spurs 31- Mavs 23
    Playoff games head to head
    Spurs 11 - Mavs 7
    Playoff series
    Spurs 2 - Mavs 1
    Division les
    Spurs 5 - Mavs 1
    Championships*
    Spurs 3 - Mavs 0

    It's really nice that you attempted to re-frame the conversation only to cover a time frame where the Mavs are preceived to have done well. Let's look into that one a little deeper, shall we?

    Since 2005-2006 ("the OWNAGE era")
    Total games head to head
    Spurs 9 - Mavs 10
    Playoff games head to head
    Spurs 3 - Mavs 4
    Playoff series
    Spurs 0 - Mavs 1
    Division les
    Spurs 1 - Mavs 1
    Championships*
    Spurs 1 - Mavs 0

    Since the teams appear to have an even record in the regular season during your cherry-picked timeframe, the only difference seems to be that one playoff series, which is basically overtime of game seven. So the Mavs beat the Spurs in a five minute stretch and suddenly they are the same caliber team as the Spurs. Puh ing lease. And I'm not sure how the Mavs have had more league wide success than the Warriors; the Warriors have been to the second round in the last two seasons. The Mavs basically had one good year and suddenly that makes them superior to everyone else. Ridiculous as usual from you.


    * championships "don't apply" because fans of teams that have never won one seem to think it's not a fair comparison of team success.
    *Crickets*

  10. #60
    44-50-21-1 Biggems's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,758
    Explain to me where the ownage is:


    Spurs vs Mavs since 2000 (full season):
    Total games head to head
    Spurs 31- Mavs 23
    Playoff games head to head
    Spurs 11 - Mavs 7
    Playoff series
    Spurs 2 - Mavs 1
    Division les
    Spurs 5 - Mavs 1
    Championships*
    Spurs 3 - Mavs 0

    It's really nice that you attempted to re-frame the conversation only to cover a time frame where the Mavs are preceived to have done well. Let's look into that one a little deeper, shall we?

    Since 2005-2006 ("the OWNAGE era")
    Total games head to head
    Spurs 9 - Mavs 10
    Playoff games head to head
    Spurs 3 - Mavs 4
    Playoff series
    Spurs 0 - Mavs 1
    Division les
    Spurs 1 - Mavs 1
    Championships*
    Spurs 1 - Mavs 0

    Since the teams appear to have an even record in the regular season during your cherry-picked timeframe, the only difference seems to be that one playoff series, which is basically overtime of game seven. So the Mavs beat the Spurs in a five minute stretch and suddenly they are the same caliber team as the Spurs. Puh ing lease. And I'm not sure how the Mavs have had more league wide success than the Warriors; the Warriors have been to the second round in the last two seasons. The Mavs basically had one good year and suddenly that makes them superior to everyone else. Ridiculous as usual from you.


    * championships "don't apply" because fans of teams that have never won one seem to think it's not a fair comparison of team success.
    you sir are now banned from this thread....as proper and correct logic and reason, as well as cold hard facts, have no place in a debate with a Mavs fan.....

    GO SPURS GO

  11. #61
    REVENGE Avitus1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    3,579
    Cubs never play the Spurs so I could careless.

  12. #62
    I'm Spurtacus Spurtacus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,668
    I'm posting this blind (meaning I haven't read the thread).

    I hope Cuban stays as the Mavs owner. He's incompetent and I enjoy watching him cry like a school girl who had their doll taken away.

  13. #63
    Believe. Man of Steel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    1,065
    Bleacher Report: Mavs screwed if Cuban buys Cubs

    (mentions Spurs)


    If Mark Cuban Buys Chicago Cubs, Dallas Mavericks Are Done
    by David Cohen (Columnist)4 comments485 readsJULY 25, 2008


    The Cubs and Wrigley Field are for sale, and the first round of bidding was recently completed. Three groups have bid over a billion dollars for the en y, and the leader in the clubhouse is Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban. His bid of $1.3 billion trumps the field so far. The prohibitive favorite, John Canning, was endorsed by MLB Commissioner Bud Selig but did not make the cut.


    The other two groups in the running are the founders of what is now TD Ameritrade and a sports holding corporation. The latter group involves a congressman and Henry Aaron. It is kind of like the group formation which allowed Jay-Z to be an owner of the New Jersey Nets.


    Many Cubs fans are hoping and praying that Cuban wins out. His energy and commitment to his team is unmatched. Many Cubs fans believe he could elevate their team to a level above the curse, like John Henry did with the Red Sox. It has already reached the point where there is a website campaign: cubanandthecubs.com. (the picture for the article comes from them)


    Fans in Dallas heavily endorse Cuban with good reason. The Mavericks were an NBA bottom feeder for years before he took over. In the 90s, the Mavericks struggled despite having talent like Jason Kidd, Jamal Mashburn, Michael Finley, and Steve Nash. Cuban was a Mavs fan and decided to step in himself. On January 4th, 2000, Cuban bought the team.


    And unlike the Washington Redskins and Owner Daniel Snyder, Cuban has brought on success with his favorite team.


    In the first year of the Cuban era, the Mavs went 40-42. It was their best record since the 1989-1990 season.


    The next year, the Mavs exploded. Dirk Nowitski became a household name. The Mavs went 53-29, finishing fifth in the Western Conference. Nowitski became the first Mavs player ever to earn All-NBA honors. The Mavs were finally capitalizing on their talent.


    The year after that, the Mavs started the year 14-0 and tied for the league’s best record. They made the Western Conference finals but lost to the San Antonio Spurs.


    Two years later, the Mavs were in the finals and up 2-0 against the Miami Heat. They had a 13 point lead going into the fourth quarter and were minutes away from a 3-0 lead. Then Dwayne Wade arrived and the Mavs lost that game and the next three games to blow the finals. The team was irreperably damaged.


    The honeymoon in Dallas was over.


    The next year, the Mavs went an outstanding 67-15 and won 52 of 57 at one point during the season. Then the playoffs started. The Golden State Warriors were led by Cuban’s nemesis in former Mavs Head Coach Don Nelson. Baron Davis and the upstart Warriors tore the hearts out of the seemingly unbeatable Mavs. They dominated the Mavs and won the series 4-2, becoming just the third team ever to beat a number one seed in the opening round. And they didn’t just beat them. They dismantled them. They won the four games by 12, 18, 14, and 25 points.


    The psyche of the Dallas squad was absolutely shredded at this point. This is also when whispers began about Cuban thinking of selling the Mavs.


    Last season, the Mavs clearly took a step backwards. In what looked like a last ditch effort, Cuban and the Mavs traded promising point guard Devin Harris and valuable future first round draft picks to the Nets for Jason Kidd. Kidd and the Mavs weren’t good afterwards and the Mavs lost in the opening round to another upstart team, the New Orleans Hornets.


    The whispers of Cuban selling the team were getting louder.


    Now Cuban is the front-runner to buy the Cubs. If Bud Selig and the other owners get over themselves, Cuban will be the next owner of Wrigley and the Cubs. What could separate Cuban from the other two groups are the renovations he would be willing to pay for the stadium. It is estimated the costs of renovating Wrigley Field are between $400 and $600 million. Cuban has already shown a creativity and brilliance in renovating the Mavericks and would deliver the same results with Wrigley.


    Cuban as an owner is an amazing asset. His dedication to putting everything he has into his franchise is tremendous. He becomes part of his team. He can’t just sign the checks; he must be immersed in his club.


    This is why Mavs fans better pray Cuban doesn’t win the Cubs.


    Cuban is a wise businessman and understands that he cannot give his whole-hearted effort if he owns two teams in different parts of the country. He has proven he can pounce on an opportunity. That’s how he acquired his massive wealth. He can’t be the owner he feels he should be if he owns both the Mavericks and the Cubs. Especially with the length of the baseball season.


    Cuban, if he seriously looks at it, might acknowledge privately that the Mavs window of opportunity has closed. With the Hornets, Lakers, and Blazers all young teams on the rise and the perennial Spurs now in their le year (their pattern is to win every two years), the Mavericks are in a tough spot. Either a drastic shakeup has to be made or they won’t make the playoffs next year.


    Cuban wants to win and is looking for a chance to do so. He feels the Cubs might fill the void.


    They are the ultimate challenge. They haven’t won in a century. Assuming the Cubs fall short again this year, Cuban could become a folk hero. If he were to lead the Cubs to a World Series and do it in quick fashion he would go down as one of the greatest owners of our time.


    The Cubs themselves have a solid core of players. Zambrano and Harden could anchor the rotation for the next five years. Carlos Marmol could evolve into one of the game’s best closers in due time. The Cubs have a solid young catcher in Geovany Soto. They have several highly talented position players. They also have some up and coming talent in the minors, like recently called up pitcher Jeff Samardzija (who might be the best wide receiver playing in Chicago). The Cubs are much better equipped than the Mavs for a le run in the coming years.


    The Cubs are just opening their window of opportunity. The Mavs will soon be going through the rebuilding cycle.


    Cuban put the Mavs in position to win a championship but the players choked for him. It was out of his hands once his team went up 2-0 in the finals with a fourth quarter lead. Dallas and their core players are yet to recover from their collapse against Miami, and Cuban can't do anything to change their psychology.


    Cuban basically has a choice to make. He can begin a long rebuilding process in Dallas. He could become a legend in Chicago.


    The choice is his.


    That $1.3 billion bid was his decision.



    If Cuban does indeed buy the Cubs he will likely look into selling the Mavericks at some point within the next calendar year. He will make sure to sell the team to a reputable owner; he won’t sell the team to a Clay Bennett. The next Mavs owner will probably be smart enough to have some success.



    But they will never be the same. David Stern will be celebrating, but there won't be a party in Dallas.

  14. #64
    Speeding! Sissiborgo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    836
    I hate that guy and im not the only one haha

  15. #65
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    Bleacher Report: Mavs screwed if Cuban buys Cubs

    (mentions Spurs)


    If Mark Cuban Buys Chicago Cubs, Dallas Mavericks Are Done
    by David Cohen (Columnist)4 comments485 readsJULY 25, 2008


    The Cubs and Wrigley Field are for sale, and the first round of bidding was recently completed. Three groups have bid over a billion dollars for the en y, and the leader in the clubhouse is Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban. His bid of $1.3 billion trumps the field so far. The prohibitive favorite, John Canning, was endorsed by MLB Commissioner Bud Selig but did not make the cut.


    The other two groups in the running are the founders of what is now TD Ameritrade and a sports holding corporation. The latter group involves a congressman and Henry Aaron. It is kind of like the group formation which allowed Jay-Z to be an owner of the New Jersey Nets.


    Many Cubs fans are hoping and praying that Cuban wins out. His energy and commitment to his team is unmatched. Many Cubs fans believe he could elevate their team to a level above the curse, like John Henry did with the Red Sox. It has already reached the point where there is a website campaign: cubanandthecubs.com. (the picture for the article comes from them)


    Fans in Dallas heavily endorse Cuban with good reason. The Mavericks were an NBA bottom feeder for years before he took over. In the 90s, the Mavericks struggled despite having talent like Jason Kidd, Jamal Mashburn, Michael Finley, and Steve Nash. Cuban was a Mavs fan and decided to step in himself. On January 4th, 2000, Cuban bought the team.


    And unlike the Washington Redskins and Owner Daniel Snyder, Cuban has brought on success with his favorite team.


    In the first year of the Cuban era, the Mavs went 40-42. It was their best record since the 1989-1990 season.


    The next year, the Mavs exploded. Dirk Nowitski became a household name. The Mavs went 53-29, finishing fifth in the Western Conference. Nowitski became the first Mavs player ever to earn All-NBA honors. The Mavs were finally capitalizing on their talent.


    The year after that, the Mavs started the year 14-0 and tied for the league’s best record. They made the Western Conference finals but lost to the San Antonio Spurs.


    Two years later, the Mavs were in the finals and up 2-0 against the Miami Heat. They had a 13 point lead going into the fourth quarter and were minutes away from a 3-0 lead. Then Dwayne Wade arrived and the Mavs lost that game and the next three games to blow the finals. The team was irreperably damaged.


    The honeymoon in Dallas was over.


    The next year, the Mavs went an outstanding 67-15 and won 52 of 57 at one point during the season. Then the playoffs started. The Golden State Warriors were led by Cuban’s nemesis in former Mavs Head Coach Don Nelson. Baron Davis and the upstart Warriors tore the hearts out of the seemingly unbeatable Mavs. They dominated the Mavs and won the series 4-2, becoming just the third team ever to beat a number one seed in the opening round. And they didn’t just beat them. They dismantled them. They won the four games by 12, 18, 14, and 25 points.


    The psyche of the Dallas squad was absolutely shredded at this point. This is also when whispers began about Cuban thinking of selling the Mavs.


    Last season, the Mavs clearly took a step backwards. In what looked like a last ditch effort, Cuban and the Mavs traded promising point guard Devin Harris and valuable future first round draft picks to the Nets for Jason Kidd. Kidd and the Mavs weren’t good afterwards and the Mavs lost in the opening round to another upstart team, the New Orleans Hornets.


    The whispers of Cuban selling the team were getting louder.


    Now Cuban is the front-runner to buy the Cubs. If Bud Selig and the other owners get over themselves, Cuban will be the next owner of Wrigley and the Cubs. What could separate Cuban from the other two groups are the renovations he would be willing to pay for the stadium. It is estimated the costs of renovating Wrigley Field are between $400 and $600 million. Cuban has already shown a creativity and brilliance in renovating the Mavericks and would deliver the same results with Wrigley.


    Cuban as an owner is an amazing asset. His dedication to putting everything he has into his franchise is tremendous. He becomes part of his team. He can’t just sign the checks; he must be immersed in his club.


    This is why Mavs fans better pray Cuban doesn’t win the Cubs.


    Cuban is a wise businessman and understands that he cannot give his whole-hearted effort if he owns two teams in different parts of the country. He has proven he can pounce on an opportunity. That’s how he acquired his massive wealth. He can’t be the owner he feels he should be if he owns both the Mavericks and the Cubs. Especially with the length of the baseball season.


    Cuban, if he seriously looks at it, might acknowledge privately that the Mavs window of opportunity has closed. With the Hornets, Lakers, and Blazers all young teams on the rise and the perennial Spurs now in their le year (their pattern is to win every two years), the Mavericks are in a tough spot. Either a drastic shakeup has to be made or they won’t make the playoffs next year.


    Cuban wants to win and is looking for a chance to do so. He feels the Cubs might fill the void.


    They are the ultimate challenge. They haven’t won in a century. Assuming the Cubs fall short again this year, Cuban could become a folk hero. If he were to lead the Cubs to a World Series and do it in quick fashion he would go down as one of the greatest owners of our time.


    The Cubs themselves have a solid core of players. Zambrano and Harden could anchor the rotation for the next five years. Carlos Marmol could evolve into one of the game’s best closers in due time. The Cubs have a solid young catcher in Geovany Soto. They have several highly talented position players. They also have some up and coming talent in the minors, like recently called up pitcher Jeff Samardzija (who might be the best wide receiver playing in Chicago). The Cubs are much better equipped than the Mavs for a le run in the coming years.


    The Cubs are just opening their window of opportunity. The Mavs will soon be going through the rebuilding cycle.


    Cuban put the Mavs in position to win a championship but the players choked for him. It was out of his hands once his team went up 2-0 in the finals with a fourth quarter lead. Dallas and their core players are yet to recover from their collapse against Miami, and Cuban can't do anything to change their psychology.


    Cuban basically has a choice to make. He can begin a long rebuilding process in Dallas. He could become a legend in Chicago.


    The choice is his.


    That $1.3 billion bid was his decision.



    If Cuban does indeed buy the Cubs he will likely look into selling the Mavericks at some point within the next calendar year. He will make sure to sell the team to a reputable owner; he won’t sell the team to a Clay Bennett. The next Mavs owner will probably be smart enough to have some success.



    But they will never be the same. David Stern will be celebrating, but there won't be a party in Dallas.
    That may be the worst article I've ever read, and not because of the choking references. I'm not sensitive like that. Turgid, turgid writing, and that guy hasn't done his homework. Cuban isn't selling the Mavs regardless of what happens with the Cubs.

    Why did you post this?

  16. #66
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    Explain to me where the ownage is:



    It's really nice that you attempted to re-frame the conversation only to cover a time frame where the Mavs are preceived to have done well
    I didn't reframe anything. This was my initial post on the subject

    http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...5&postcount=28


    "The Spurs haven't had to go through the Mavs to get their last two les. The Mavs have owned the Spurs in that period of time."


    You're the one reframing to cover the fact that you didn't know what you were talking about. If you want to go back to the Twin Towers era, or earlier in the nineties when the Mavs sucked ass, then, of course, the Spurs have owned the Mavs historically. All you're doing now is changing the argument to compensate for the fact that you lost the previous one.

    Since the teams appear to have an even record in the regular season during your cherry-picked timeframe, the only difference seems to be that one playoff series, which is basically overtime of game seven
    .

    That series ends in six games if JET wasn't so fond of Finley's junk. The Spurs were lucky to get it to a Game 7. The Mavs were not eons above the Spurs that year, but they were decisively better head to head than San Antonio during a period that lasted from the beginning of the 05-06 season to the Kidd trade.

    So the Mavs beat the Spurs in a five minute stretch and suddenly they are the same caliber team as the Spurs.
    Head to Head they had the Spurs number. I never said anything about them having the same amount of hardware. Pay attention! You are arguing something completely different. You can do better OV, I know you can!

    We won something like 9 out of 14 games head to head including the playoff series until the Kidd trade.

    And I'm not sure how the Mavs have had more league wide success than the Warriors; the Warriors have been to the second round in the last two seasons.
    Uh, the Mavs have won far more games and they have a Finals appearance. I'm not saying you should like the Mavs, we're rivals and all, but the irrational smack just makes you look stupid.

    championships "don't apply" because fans of teams that have never won one seem to think it's not a fair comparison of team success
    You claimed that the Spurs have *owned* the Mavs. If you were referring all the way back to 1980, or just since 2001 when Cuban bought the team, you'd be on a bit firmer footing. I said that the Mavs have owned the Spurs since 2005. I didn't say anything about who has more championships.

    Let's sum up the argument so far:

    OV: "A = Z."

    Findog: "No, A = A. In fact, A is just about as far away from Z as you can possibly get. Here's a link to the alphabet."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet

    OV: "No, A = Z, because (insert irrelevant non-sequitur here).

    Findog: "I'm sorry, but you seem to have a comprehension problem, or you may just be trying to twist mine to make your own woefully inadequate explanation seem better."

    OV: "FOUR RINGS!"

    Findog: sadly shakes head...

  17. #67
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    http://www.dallasbasketball.com/fullColumn.php?id=525

    “I have no intentions of selling the Mavs. Cubs or not,’’ says Cuban.

  18. #68
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Little refresher for you:

    As long as the Spurs continue to own Mark Cuban I don't give a about anything else.
    How do the Spurs own Mark Cuban? We've owned your asses for 3 straight years.
    Today's date: July 28, 2008.
    Date three years ago, july 28, 2005
    Spurs' record against Dallas during that time: 9-10

    1 playoff series win in overtime of game seven?
    The Spurs haven't had to go through the Mavs to get their last two les. The Mavs have owned the Spurs in that period of time.
    Yeah, it's somehow the Spurs' fault that they haven't been meeting the Mavs in the playoffs and I'm the one with a logic deficiency.
    The Mavs have owned the Spurs, but the Spurs have had more league-wide success.
    Points out that Mavs have 1 game over .500 record against San Antonio during cherry-picked timeframe.
    That series ends in six games if JET wasn't so fond of Finley's junk. The Spurs were lucky to get it to a Game 7.
    Refuting stats with ifs and buts smacks of desperation.

    We won something like 9 out of 14 games head to head including the playoff series until the Kidd trade.
    See "3 straight years" quote and refer to "reframing", because this is the second attempt. I'll spot you the next one: The Mavs won 3 out of 4 in 2007. If the Spurs hadn't won 3 out of 4 in 2008 then you might almost have a case.

    You claimed that the Spurs have *owned* the Mavs.
    Actually, I claimed that the Spurs have owned Mark Cuban, which is evidenced by his inability to control his emotions when it comes to the team, but the Spurs have quite clearly owned the Mavericks in that same time frame.

    If you were referring all the way back to 1980, or just since 2001 when Cuban bought the team, you'd be on a bit firmer footing.
    The stats I posted clearly show that my original statement was referring to the time that Mark Cuban has been with the Mavericks, so I'm not sure why you are mentioning 1980 except to distract from your huge failure in this thread.

    I said that the Mavs have owned the Spurs since 2005.
    Not only was the above in response to my statement, making it completely irrelevant, but it was proved completely and totally incorrect numerous times, and when faced with it you tried a second time to re-frame it, tried talking about Terry being suspended and the Spurs being lucky, and lastly, you implied that I've ever mentioned that the Spurs have won four championships, something I have not done in this thread at any time.

    Do you know what ownage really even means?
    Sure I do. If you have any questions, just read this post over again. There's also a pretty good example of "self-ownage" by you. Thanks for the bonus.

  19. #69
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    blah blah blah my butt hurts blah blah blah stop being mean to me blabbity blabbity ity blah
    Poow wittle Obstructed View...



    Sure I do. If you have any questions, just read this post over again. There's also a pretty good example of "self-ownage" by you. Thanks for the bonus.
    Just like the Spurs have "owned" the Mavs the past three years.


  20. #70
    I own Allanon mavs>spurs2's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    8,980
    This is a re ed argument. You both fail

  21. #71
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    I'm too stupid to even know when I've been humilitated time and time again, so I'll just keep posting. Perhaps I'll suggest you said something that you didn't actually say.
    Wait for it...
    Just like the Spurs have "owned" the Mavs the past three years.

    Thanks for playing.

  22. #72
    Ya'll Ready For This? G-Nob's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    2,074
    Report: Cuban "lead guy" to buy Cubs

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...,5437416.story

  23. #73
    Speeding! Sissiborgo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    836
    I hate everything cuban HAS!

  24. #74
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    Wait for it...


    Thanks for playing.
    Whoah, when did this get bumped?

    Watch for Obstructed View, he needs to have the last word so he'll think he "won" this exchange.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •