Arson in WTC 6

[Galileo]

Quit spamming the forum with press releases from a nutjob who has no chance of being elected.

'At least he's not boring'
By Patrick Marley
Friday, Aug 29 2008, 11:06 AM
Madison -- As part of his unusual campaign for Congress, Libertarian Kevin Barrett is planning to robo-call 30,000 people to talk about how annoying robo-calls are.



While he's at it, he's asking for their vote in the Sept. 9 primary. And he's reminding them he believes the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government.

"I've had it up to here with the boring, cowardly, mealy mouthed, lying scalawags that call themselves politicians," Barrett says in the calls that will go out Tuesday. "If they call me one more time, I'm going...to tell them: 'You dirty, lying, thieving jackals of Washington, D.C., wasted $5 trillion on that idiotic war in Iraq and you destroyed our economy.'"



He asks people to visit FireCongress.org, a site that urges people to vote against in bents.



Barrett also claims 9/11 was an inside job. Barrett was enmeshed in controversy when he taught at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for his views on those terrorist attacks.

Barrett slips into a falsetto voice during the recording so he can sound like a second person urging them to vote for Barrett. The call ends with: "At least he's not boring."



In a second round of calls that will go out Sept. 8, the day before the primary, Barrett accuses U.S. Rep. Ron Kind (D-La Crosse) of lying about his views on the war, saying Kind is "100% pro war."



Barrett faces fellow Libertarian Ben Olson III in the primary. The winner will face Kind and Republican Paul Stark, an Eau Claire home builder, in the Nov. 4 general election for the western Wisconsin district.



Filed under: Elections

http://blogs.jsonline.com/allpolitic...ot-boring.aspx

[ChumpDumper]

He is very boring.

[Galileo]

He is very boring.

so you'd rather talk about WTC 6? That was arson!

[ChumpDumper]

so you'd rather talk about WTC 6?

You started the topic, dumbass.

That was arson!

Where is your proof?

[RandomGuy]

He is very boring.

He is kinda like shampoo directions.

"State 9-11 was an inside job, lather, rinse, repeat"

[Booharv]

Wow, Chumpdumper is schooling that dude.

[TeyshaBlue]

Wow, Chumpdumper is schooling that dude.

Like it takes a brain surgeon to school Galileo.

[Galileo]

Like it takes a brain surgeon to school Galileo.

GALILEO is INVINCIBLE!

[smeagol]

Galileo is losing (it)

[Nbadan]

It didn't collapse in its own footprint. As I showed you in the other thread, it heavily damaged buildings north and west of it.

But you ran away from that thread, brave Sir Robin.

So it toppled over like a tree cut at its base? No. Case closed.

[ChumpDumper]

So it toppled over like a tree cut at its base? No. Case closed.

Dan, when are you going to admit that you lied when you said none of the buildings next to WTC received no damage from it when it collapsed?

[ChumpDumper]

The military exercises actually decreased response times in many cases. Any games involving hijacked planes were scheduled later in the day.

Source? Planes were delayed because no-one knew if the attack was real or if they were part of Cheney's domestic war games....planes were dispatched out to sea, that's why it took them so long to protect NY airspace....

Here is an exchange between Congressman Tim Roemer and Air Force General and NORAD commander Ralph E. Eberhart:

MR. ROEMER: General Eberhart, a question about our training posture on the day of 9/11. On page five of our Staff Statement, the FAA says at 8:38 in the morning, "Hi, Boston Center, TMU, we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York and we need you guys to -- we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there. Help us out." NEADS says, "Is this real world or an exercise?"

My question is, you were postured for an exercise against the former Soviet Union. Did that help or hurt? Did that help in terms of were more people prepared? Did you have more people ready? Were more fighters fueled with more fuel? Or did this hurt in terms of people thinking, "No, there's no possibility that this is real world; we're engaged in an exercise," and delay things? Or did it have both impacts?

GEN. EBERHART: Sir, my belief is that it helped because of the manning, because of the focus, because the crews -- they have to be airborne in 15 minutes. And that morning, because of the exercise, they were airborne in six or eight minutes. And so I believe that focus helped.

The situation that you're referring to, I think, at most cost us 30 seconds -- 30 seconds.

MR. ROEMER: That's what we have recorded. I just wondered if there was more of that down the line.

GEN. EBERHART: No, it became painfully clear, Commissioner, that this was not an exercise.

http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/a...2004-06-17.htm

Now in turn I would like the source for your contentions listed above, dan. I certainly agree that planes were sent over the ocean, but that was the result of a difference in plotting the location of aircraft between military and civilian aviation.

Sorry I took so long to dig up the specific hearing, but I do believe follow-through is important. Wouldn't you agree?

[efrem1]

Is this the companion thread to Jack Chick's contention that catholics assasinated Lincoln?