8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech Probe of WTC 1, 2, 7 Coll

[Shastafarian]

bigger than killing all the Indians or slavery. Nope.

Are you serious? Killing Indians and Slavery were "cover ups"? You're not that stupid. Please tell me you're not that stupid.

[ChumpDumper]

Ok, this post, and the post before it, proves Galileo to be a troll right? No one would honestly say, "No one saw laser beams" as an excuse that laser beams weren't used, after saying that no det cord was found so that means it must be radio-fused. And no one would say slavery or killing Native Americans was a coverup. He's GOTTA be a troll heh.

He's mentally ill.

[RandomGuy]

There's no evidence of laser beams. No one saw them.

Silly vanilli.

Light is not restricted to visible wavelengths, so neither are lasers.

(hint: xrays)

[ChumpDumper]

Silly vanilli.

Light is not restricted to visible wavelengths, so neither are lasers.

(hint: xrays)

xrayzebra is in on it!

[RandomGuy]

Ok, this post, and the post before it, proves Galileo to be a troll right? No one would honestly say, "No one saw laser beams" as an excuse that laser beams weren't used, after saying that no det cord was found so that means it must be radio-fused. And no one would say slavery or killing Native Americans was a coverup. He's GOTTA be a troll heh.

Since you are new:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65131

Read through a good chunk of it. He comes in towards the middle.

He isn't quite a troll, just very fervent in his religion. (9-11 truth cult)

[Shastafarian]

Since you are new:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65131

Read through a good chunk of it. He comes in towards the middle.

He isn't quite a troll, just very fervent in his religion. (9-11 truth cult)

He thinks slavery and killing indians were cover ups. Either he's an immense idiot or he's a troll. You going with immense idiot?

[Galileo]

Ok, this post, and the post before it, proves Galileo to be a troll right? No one would honestly say, "No one saw laser beams" as an excuse that laser beams weren't used, after saying that no det cord was found so that means it must be radio-fused. And no one would say slavery or killing Native Americans was a coverup. He's GOTTA be a troll heh.

You don't think killing millions of Indians is worse than 9/11?

[Galileo]

He thinks slavery and killing indians were cover ups. Either he's an immense idiot or he's a troll. You going with immense idiot?

If it wasn't a cover up, how did the white man get away with killing the Indians?

[RandomGuy]

He thinks slavery and killing indians were cover ups. Either he's an immense idiot or he's a troll. You going with immense idiot?

Yeah, I would go more for an idiot than a troll.

A troll is a semi-fake act. This guy isn't acting like he is an idiot, he IS an idiot.

[RandomGuy]

If it wasn't a cover up, how did the white man get away with killing the Indians?

um, what?

There wasn't any det cord, so we can be pretty sure that they were killed in a controlled demolition.

[DarrinS]

So, to be a 911 truther you have to believe the following scenarios:


Explosives were planted in WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 (we can't leave out WTC7, because WTC7, being less than ½ the height of WTC1,2 will cause twice as much terror.) No one saw anybody plant these explosives and there is no evidence of any after the collapse.


Then, the govt had get some remote controlled airplanes to crash into the buildings at the exact area where they planted the explosives. After all, the building began to fail at the locations where the planes struck (except for mysterious WTC7 <gasp>). They had to get some airplaines, because terrorists have never been known to just plant bombs in buildings and, besides, airplanes with fake hijackers create even more terror.


The govt then had to hire actors to portray the real passengers that were on the 4 flights. These actors had to make phone calls to family members of people that were on the planes. They also had to hire actors to play the part of the terrorists. These actors had to attend flight schools and had to purchase tickets and board the planes. After all, they had to fly the REAL passengers to some undisclosed location, like Area 51.


Then, for some reason, instead of using an airplane again, the govt decided to fire a missle at the Pentagon. The missle had to be loaded with real aircraft parts, which would be scattered about the site to make it look real.


Then, for whatever reason, the govt crashed or shot down something that wasn't an airplane into some field near Shanksville, PA. I guess they wanted to terrorize nearby cows. This unidentified object also was loaded with real aircraft parts to make it look real.



All sounds pretty reasonable to me.

[Galileo]

Yeah, I would go more for an idiot than a troll.

A troll is a semi-fake act. This guy isn't acting like he is an idiot, he IS an idiot.

RandomGuy is an idiot posing as an intelligent person!

[ChumpDumper]

If it wasn't a cover up, how did the white man get away with killing the Indians?

It wasn't a cover up because it wasn't covered up.

[Galileo]

So, to be a 911 truther you have to believe the following scenarios:


Explosives were planted in WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 (we can't leave out WTC7, because WTC7, being less than ½ the height of WTC1,2 will cause twice as much terror.) No one saw anybody plant these explosives and there is no evidence of any after the collapse.


Then, the govt had get some remote controlled airplanes to crash into the buildings at the exact area where they planted the explosives. After all, the building began to fail at the locations where the planes struck (except for mysterious WTC7 <gasp>). They had to get some airplaines, because terrorists have never been known to just plant bombs in buildings and, besides, airplanes with fake hijackers create even more terror.

Sounds good so far.

The govt then had to hire actors to portray the real passengers that were on the 4 flights. These actors had to make phone calls to family members of people that were on the planes. They also had to hire actors to play the part of the terrorists. These actors had to attend flight schools and had to purchase tickets and board the planes. After all, they had to fly the REAL passengers to some undisclosed location, like Area 51.

The hijackers and passengers were real, never heard this one before.

Then, for some reason, instead of using an airplane again, the govt decided to fire a missle at the Pentagon. The missle had to be loaded with real aircraft parts, which would be scattered about the site to make it look real.

The plane hit the Pentagon.

Then, for whatever reason, the govt crashed or shot down something that wasn't an airplane into some field near Shanksville, PA. I guess they wanted to terrorize nearby cows. This unidentified object also was loaded with real aircraft parts to make it look real.

They shot FL93 down in Pennsylvannia.

All sounds pretty reasonable to me.

Agreed.

[Galileo]

It wasn't a cover up because it wasn't covered up.

What's your definition of a cover up?

[ChumpDumper]

Why would they shoot down flight 93?

[ChumpDumper]

What's your definition of a cover up?

Covering something up.

[DarrinS]

The hijackers and passengers were real, never heard this one before.

How did they get the hijackers to cooporate?

[Galileo]

Why would they shoot down flight 93?

Between 9:45 and 9:55, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld consulted. The operation was over, so they had to shoot FL93 down before it got back to NYC to hit WTC 7.

It would have been too su ious for FL93 to fly in and hit WTC 7 that late.

[Galileo]

How did they get the hijackers to cooporate?

cashola.

[DarrinS]

Between 9:45 and 9:55, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld consulted. The operation was over, so they had to shoot FL93 down before it got back to NYC to hit WTC 7.

It would have been too su ious for FL93 to fly in and hit WTC 7 that late.

Yeah, because WTC7 collapsing by itself wouldn't arouse any su ion.

[Galileo]

Covering something up.

Covering what up?

[DarrinS]

cashola.

Pretty hard to use the cashola when you're dead.

[Galileo]

Yeah, because WTC7 collapsing by itself wouldn't arouse any su ion.

It didn't rouse you from your slumber.

[DarrinS]

It didn't rouse you from your slumber.

I was too busy paying attention to the big buildings.