Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 55 of 55
  1. #51
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    I get a good feeling when board Republicans panic over things like this.

  2. #52
    Believe. Anti.Hero's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    3,588
    It's amazing how many people in government used to work for Fannie/Freddie

    "Change"

  3. #53
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    Wouldn't that be a positive for you internets tough guys?
    wouldn't it be a negative for the 13th Amendment?

    And where is Dan, a couple of years ago him and boutons were crying on this board that Bush and Cheney were going to ins ute a draft for all young folks.

    Now Obama and Emanuel are talking about compulsory service and they're worshiping the development.

  4. #54
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    From what I've read, it's far from compulsory.

  5. #55
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    And where is Dan, a couple of years ago him and boutons were crying on this board that Bush and Cheney were going to ins ute a draft for all young folks.

    Now Obama and Emanuel are talking about compulsory service and they're worshiping the development.
    And isn't it funny that the sponsor was a democrat, I think it was Sh er, and all the co-sponsors were democrat. Not a single republican backed the draft bill!

    I already saw a retort that "It wouldn't be mandatory." Then why is this in the earlier quote:

    Emanuel and co-author Bruce Reed insist "this is not a draft," but go on to write of young men and women, "the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service." They also warn, "[s]ome Republicans will squeal about individual freedom," ruling out any likelihood that they would let people opt out of universal citizen service.
    And they correctly say the republicans will see it as an infringement of freedom. If not a draft, what is it when they acknowledge freedoms are an issue?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •