have you seen the knicks with marbarrryon the court then
Knicks are winning, yeah I've seen them. Scola more than likely would have come around simply because Oberto and Ginobili were there and they could have resolve the issues, the Marbury thing goes deeper than what they are reporting and I personally feel it has a lot to do with the court case from a season ago.
Either way I'm just referring to him being useful to the team with what he does
what has houston done with him
still not get past the first round of the playoffs
my point is he would be useful, I'll go further, valuable to the Spurs and they regret the move
no they do not
if a player do not fit they move one
they know houston still can not get past the first round with him
notice they did not trade him to the lakers,pistons, boston
yeah and they still have no second round appearance either
Scola would be fine on this team, but so what? It's done.
AGREED.
So what? It's done.to let Scola go was just a up
We already knew your point a long time ago.
You're the professor missing an S...
Nah, I'm in America.
We talk American.
My suggestion is we about Scola some more.
Woo-hoo!
Okay then.....who??
How about some names that are VIABLE AND DOABLE.
The Rockets won mostly because they hit some tough shots, that didn't make as much in the past, and also becaus the the entire Spurs' roster....for the most part missed shots they usually make, including Tim. The Spurs had an off shooting night compared to what they have been doing. Some of those shots were wide open. Houston's "D" was good but not as good as the box score shows....the Spurs shot .377 from the field.
Who??
God can't even get names right.
It is Darko Milicic.
I don't think too much of his game either.
Yes, you're missing an s. If you were really writing that in Spanish, then try 'El Profesor.' If you were attempting English, try 'The Professor.' But don't try and criticize native people's understanding of their language when your demo of Spanglish shows you don't know the grammar.
Yes, one game, the Spurs played poorly, but they have been playing well and have shown that Scola is decent, I don't think he really would be the inside presence the Spurs need, he isn't a really good rebounder or shotblocker that they need, he only had 3 boards last night, sure he is avg 7.3 for the season, but the Spurs need more of an intimidator type next to Tim. Scola is justa glorified Oberto.
What a joke........when's the last time that Oberto grabbed 18 rebounds in a game?
when's the last time Oberto averaged 14 & 9 in the playoffs? I understand that y'all want to move past the Scola issue, but don't do it by making up. Oberto is absolute garbage....Scola is one of the more talented bigs in the NBA, there's a big difference.
I am waiting for a big to be named on the pacers
scola has not gotten over 5 against spurs this year
against booner,oberta, and thomas
who he you think he is so much better
and this is supposed to prove what?
That's more of just a freak stat, not the norm......how about you go pull up his rebounds against y'all last year...
He's grabbed 9 boards against KG and the Celtics, gabbed 9 boards against LA's bigs, and grabbed 10 boards against Chandler and West.So please spare me the B.S.
humm against decent bigs he can not even grab double digit rebounds and you keep bringing up that 18 rebounds
Scola is a pretty good basketball player
He's playing next to Yao who grabs about 10 a game and still manages to clean his fair share of the glass......you truly are a re aren't you?
dude when spurs had dennis rodman they had two bigs getting over 10 rebounds a game
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
