That was pretty weak...that shot was clearly late. And it's typical of you wrestling watchers to think that was cool.
but, it was against the kings, so wgaf..
Nah..don't bash on Iron Mexican..he's a good guy. He wasn't saying it was the Spurs fault on this occasion, that was Deadly Dynasty. Iron Mexican was just saying it wasn't the Lakers fault on the .4...and he's right..it was the stupid official's part, and the stupid rule. It should be changed, and I'm sure it will.
His point is that he is a ing re and just OWNED himself in front of everyone with his pathetic statement.
He got owned by his own statement.
I wonder if the 80's Laker fans are better than this trash.
You speak the truth.
I'm a wrestling watcher..lol..but there's nothing cool about it. I'll definitely take that though. Helps us, helps Sacto...no problems here.
Just get tired of fake fans and trolls, man. It's bull .You speak the truth.
Fair enough. I thought he said it was the Spurs' fault.
naw..that was Deadly Dynasty..the Laker fan that's a bag. Iron Mexican is one of the only sane Laker fans on here..him and Allanon are pretty good guys.
Dude, listen, I'm not trying to start an argument. Is it possible to have a civilized discussion? C'mon..
Back to the issue, you're stance on that game is delusional. 1.5 seconds isn't enough time to get a perfect shot. Our defense is going to key in on your big guys all day long. Do you think that Parker would have a better shot at hitting a contested fade-away 3? Cause' that's about all you were gonna get.
Furthermore, you say Bonner would never be given a last second shot....but....he did.
The shot Bonner got was far cleaner than anything you would have gotten. He shot it clean and virtually uncontested.
That foul occurred at like 1.5 left, but time ran off the clock, which was ALSO not reviewable. There a chance for a much better shot at 1.5 than there is at .4, unless you're the 2004 Lakers, then you can catch, jump stop into a major fadeaway and then shoot.
Perfect shot? no..but better than Bonner. Defenses key on our big guys all the time, we still get our shots. (and the fact that you say YOUR guys just PROVED your not a Spurs fan) Bonner was given that shot because it was forced. With 1.5 seconds, we can get a Mason jumper..there's a LOT more options that only .3 seconds, which means you have to have an EXTREMELY quick shot to even get it off. The only guy on our team to have a shot that fast is Bonner, which is the ONLY reason he got the shot. Please..if you want to have a discussion, think first.
Dude, at 1.5, you can even make a second pass, or you can dribble once.
Bonner sucks.
Damn Sequ..you really hate Matt, huh? He was bull tonight though...except for that one three.
First let me ask: are you working under the assumption that the league would have overturned that Bonner 3 had it gone in? I can tell you from experience, they wouldn't. See: Roy hitting a game winner against us that took more time than he had. That was a real hose job.
Back to the Rox Spurs game. I just fail to see how you think that 1 second would have given you a much better shot. Bonner got a WIDE OPEN shot. Look at the end of the game tonight and the shot they got off with about 1.3 left. Would you rather have that?
When you have barely more than a second left you don't exactly get a lot of choices. You would have either gotten the same shot or a worse shot if you had 1.5 for the exact same reason. Our defense would not have allowed Parker, Duncan, or Mason to get open easy shots. If you think a 3pt contested fade-away is a higher percentage shot than a set 3 then I'm done talking.
WTF
Bonner hustled his ass off and battled for rebounds and left it all on the court.
Bonner may have missed shots but he gave all he had.
well, that's great tpark... ....zarko paspalj gave all he had also...
I'm not.
Ok. If a guy dribbles, what does that accomplish? Either Shane Battier or Ron Artest are going to close any gap they may have had and force an impossible 30 foot contested fade away (see: the Kings last shot tonight)
If you pass...what does that accomplish? By the time the receiver of the pass gets it there won't be more than .5 or so left (catch ball-->see teamate-->time ball takes to get to him) then he'll get to have a contested fade away jumper with even less time on the clock. If you think one pass is good enough to get an easy shot you are really under-estimating the Rockets defense.
What you got was a wide open shot with a pure relase. No off balance contested fade-away. You would have gotten nothing better. And if you would have, you're talking about insignificant percentage increases.
What game did you watch? He couldn't control that Spencer Hawes guy, that had a career night. Giving it all he had and falling short is a recurrent theme with Matt. He probably is a really nice guy, but not a starter on an NBA team.
When you decide to come with an intelligent, well thought, adult take, then I will take you seriously.
Till then, go back to the troll forum with the other 15 year olds, and STFU.
What game did I watch?
I watched the game where Bonner was hustling for rebounds tipping them out and busting his ass.
Thats all I said.
Whatever though, keep up the Bonner hate, I'm shocked theres no, "Why is Michael Finley even in uniform" threads.
First off, the Bonner 3 WOULD have counted, because the rule is that LESS than .3 seconds forces you to tip in. With .3, you CAN shoot..the Spurs asked the officials before the play even happened. 1.3 seconds would have given us a much better shot, as I already said. Read carefully. Bonner is not a game winning shooter..period..he's not clutch. We had Mason, we had Parker, we had other great players...screens would have gotten them open..PERIOD! Bonner had to shoot, because he was the only Spur who has a quick enough release to shoot a shot in .3 seconds. Add a second to that, and any player on the court, including Mason, has enough time to take the ball, maybe even get a shot fake and force a foul..ANYTHING could have happened...Take it from a guy who played college ball. .3 seconds and 1.3 seconds is a WORLD of difference.
It would be 'hate' if this would be the exception, not the rule. And 'hustling for rebounds and tipping them' while not getting possession of the ball is useless. See Kurt Thomas for a useful rebounder. , Nocioni had more rebounds than Matt tonight. But I guess that considering he's been unable to get more than 3 rebounds a game lately, I should be grateful he got 7 tonight.
The backboard isn't lit up even though the shot clock shows 00. Could that be why the refs missed the call?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
