Reply With Quote
Didn't the Lakers just get murdered by a Houston team without Yao and T-Mac?at you sons.
lol that you root for the same team as DrHouse.
who the are you trying to e thug it up. i know you're a office who take orders from s at work and wouldnt talk like that in real life. stfu, you're in no position to talk since your team rolled over and took it up the ass from a mavericks team that look like they are going to get swept by a team thats never won anything before
Didn't the Lakers just get murdered by a Houston team without Yao and T-Mac?
lol that you root for the same team as DrHouse.
no , thats y this post was created. wuts the series again? 2-2? yea exactly, while the spurs lost in 5 to a teams thats never won a ring.Didn't the Lakers just get murdered by a Houston team without Yao and T-Mac?
lol that you root for the same team as DrHouse.
LOL that you root for a team that needs to rebuild and will be a bottom dweller for another 25 years
2 spurs - 1 Laker in MVP voting this year.
lol that Spurs have a better future and less bloated payroll.
lol losing to a fully healthy Mavs team when injured >>>>>>>>> getting plowed by Rockets that are depleted.
What is the Lakers excuse again?at you sons. PROPS.
Who are you trying to e-thug it up, I bet you work at an office. If you were applying for a job you would never speak like that. You know you would not get hired with such poor speech.
2 spurs - 1 Laker in MVP voting this year.
lol that Spurs have a better future and less bloated payroll.
lol losing to a fully healthy Mavs team when injured >>>>>>>>> getting plowed by Rockets that are depleted.
What is the Lakers excuse again?
now whos doing the crying?
if by excuse you mean that the rockets played like wounded dogs after losing yao and lakers coming out soft because they thought it would be an easy win like i stated?
2 spurs v 1 in mvp voting???? are you serious? THATS your take? and less bloated payroll?? you guys are still over that cap and cant sign FA's so who cares about the lux tax if your owner is willing to pay it? you have serious denial issues if you think the future of the spurs looks better than the lakers. seriously stfu
oh yes grammar teacher. people always point out others' grammar when they have no take in the subject matter. sorry i didnt know this was a thesis paper i have to write at ucla to get my mba in the summer.
How is that me crying???? It is me showing DrHouse that you bring up losing to the Mavs (which I accept) and ignore the fact that your salary capped team is tied 2-2 with an absolutely depleted Rockets who just made it out of the first round for the first time in yearsssssss.
Shhhh, girl.
P.S. Blockbuster has this movie for rent, I suggest you watch it before youabout e-thuggery.
lol DrHouse = You
What is the subject matter: Laker "fans" being bandwagon d-bags and only join SpursTalk after they get Gasol?
Read the thread le brah.
exactly. spurs fans like the bring up the past right? so how many rings do the mavs have? how many do the rockets? so having lost to a team that's never won jack is better than being tied in a series against a team that has? werrd
No, they correct your grammar when you are hard to understand. Plus your venacular and your grammar are two different things...ummm, MBA at UCLA right? I'm sorry, I guess I have no take "in the subject matter." Oh, by the way, are these your amigos? http://forums.lakersground.net/viewtopic.php?t=86798
you're right. laker fans should join every sports forum when they start out.
because its hard to distinguish between WUT and WHAT on a internet forum right? and by venacular did you mean vernacular using plain dialect or a common way of speech?
Nope, but they shouldn't join rival forums just after the Gasol trade. If they do join, which is fine and welcomed, they should not be DrHouse's.
We live in the now. This thread is about the Lakers and their "fans" and not the Spurs.
Healthy Mavs>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Depleted Rockets. Even your own "fans" are disgusted with the Lakers getting owned by a decimated Rocket team.
i dont know who you keep referring to when you say just after the gasol trade, but i personally joined this forum after finding out about it on a post game conference after game 2 of the wcf
Google search won't get you through graduate school. If you need any study tips, let me know.
and didnt i not say that the lakers came out like they were going to win this sleepwalking and the rockets played like wounded dogs after losing their top dog? are we going in circles because i stated what you said and you came at me "brah"
Cue the DrHouse post...Laker "fans" are like roaches.
lol im not going to waste time on trying to convince you of my vocabulary because 1, it would make me look like a d-bag, and 2 your computer would freeze from all the searches on dictionary.com. rather im just going to say have fun watching the rest of the playoffs without you're team in it. Im pretty sure im ok on the study tips but i'll definitely let you know.
What? A double negative. That will not cut it at UCLA. I can help you, just ask.
You mean after losing their top 2 dogs? Give the Rockets credit. It is not the Lakers playing bad, it is the Rockets playing well.
You may not have grammar or logic problem solving down, but you certainly are acing your philosophy course.
that further proves my point of the rockets coming out hungry. and i believe i gave them credit when you had this take.
....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
