Reply With Quote
They're quite close.Massenburg >>>>> Willis.
Pop still has Rasho fronting Shaq (well, more like siding him), so you can't say he really learns his lessons that well.
They're quite close.Massenburg >>>>> Willis.
If Nazr were healthy and knew the team we might not be having this discussion...therefore it's useless to compare Marks to Nazr as if there is nothing wrong with Nazr.
You may think Mark's J sucks, but just based on it's appearance it is going to get more respect than Nazr's...our only hope when Nazr takes a J is that he will kill a member of the opposing team with it, or they will die laughing...because they will be doing everything in their power to encourage him to take that shot...and he'll take it too.
To answer the question in this thread, and to get out of the ridiculousness,
Nazr Mohammed, only because he has shown, next to Tim Duncan he rebounds quite well, and Nazr takes advantage of the easy looks Duncan affords him.
so in answer, Nazr, because of talent, and better rebounding.
You said that. Everyone in chat saw you say it 10 times. Good God you are a hypocrite.You may think Mark's J sucksAbsolutely not, when Nazr was healthy and knew the system he was in, that's the game he had against Houston.If Nazr were healthy and knew the team we might not be having this discussion...therefore it's useless to compare Marks to Nazr as if there is nothing wrong with Nazr.
Is Marks -- healthy and familiar with this system -- capable of that kind of game against the Rockets?
Yes or no?
Nazr Mohammed, only because he has shown, next to Tim Duncan he rebounds quite well, and Nazr takes advantage of the easy looks Duncan affords him.
so in answer, Nazr, because of talent, and better rebounding
what has sean every did for the spurs with all the offseason training camp and playing agaisnt duncan for years brought sean
atleast when duncan plays nazr looked awesome out there
And when have I said Marks J doesn't suck? It's better than Nazr's though...and if I said otherwise I was full of . I promise you. Both J's suck...but at least Marks J looks like a J and not a...crap I can't even think of what Nazr's looks like but it's ing ugly....and he looks like he is injuring himself when he shoots it.
Guess what? He's not healthy and he doesn't know the system.........now. Hence this thread.Absolutely not, when Nazr was healthy and knew the system he was in, that's the game he had against Houston.
Probably not...but Nazr isn't healthy or familiar with the system so that doesn't do us any good right now.Is Marks -- healthy and familiar with this system -- capable of that kind of game against the Rockets?
Yes or no?
You said I think it sucks. Idiot.
And yet he plays well with Duncan. Hence my answer.Guess what? He's not healthy and he doesn't know the system.........now. Hence this thread.
Idiot...I am not saying it doesn't suck...but Nazr's is worse.
Pull your head out and get it.
Pull your head out and stop making lies about what I think.
Idiot.
Do you even think Marks is capable of 13 and 8 in 21 minutes against the Pistons?
Let me get this straight...you are saying that Marks J doesn't suck? You are a bigger idiot than I thought.
I don't think that's out of the realm of possiblity. Has Marks even played 21 minutes this season?
You act like Nazr didn't suck against the Pistons...I suggest you forget the stats and rewatch that game.
I'm saying you are a ing hypocrite for saying anything remotely positive about Marks' J after bashing it all afternoon. I don't care for the jumper much, but he's going to take it.Let me get this straight...you are saying that Marks J doesn't suck?Let's act like Marks would've won the game. And the first round without Duncan.You act like Nazr didn't suck against the Pistons...I suggest you forget the stats and rewatch that game.
I am only saying something remotely postive about it when comparing it to Nazr's....
Better him than Nazr...who will also take it. At least Marks will draw a passing interest from the defenders...I don't care for the jumper much, but he's going to take it.
He couldn't have done any worse.Let's act like Marks would've won the game. And the first round without Duncan.
I flat out think we'd have a better chance of making it out of the first round with Makrs than Nazr...am I being vague about this?
Marks is shooting a sub-Heal FG% while healthy and knowing the system. i can't say it's a lock he'll do better than Nazr.
I watched the game, 13 and 8 against anybody is a good game, come on be reasobable.ou act like Nazr didn't suck against the Pistons
Mark's jumper isn't great, but it isn't bad either.
I wouldn't mind seeing him get minutes VS Seattle.
More to the game than FG%...like not having your head stuck up your ass...I think Marks plays better D, he doesn't get the stupid fouls..and his J at least looks like a J...Those are his positives...and sadly they outweigh Nazr's...Marks just looks better out there period.
If Fortson and Radman are still out, we'll have a great chance against Seattle.
Hey Chump...how come Nazr couldn't outrebound Marks today?
27%? Easy for you to ignore, to be sure.More to the game than FG%
How come Marks couldn't outshoot Nazr?
This is the most ridiculous thread ever. It ranks with, "Who would rather have in the playoffs in 1999, the coyote or David Robinson?"
Oh I will even dare to justify Nazr. So we would rather have T Mass than Nazr?
Nazr was terrible in his 12 minutes of play today. OMG!!! How many minutes has Marks played this year?
Who will guard the other team's bigs? Marks?
Who will rebound? Marks?
Answer those questions and it should be pretty easy to figure out.
No what's ridiculous as that I am agruing with all the same people who preferred Nazr over Malik Rose in the first place, and who still do.....ignorance is bliss I guess. Must be nice to be wrong and never realize it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
