Not for every single play but for really important ones like that 6th foul on Nene last night, that was a game decider.
Not for every single play but for really important ones like that 6th foul on Nene last night, that was a game decider.
This (http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...4&postcount=56) is a post from back in Round 2 that spells out some of what I'm talking about:
For whatever it's worth, the officials for that game in Cleveland (Thursday, 5/7/09) were Dan Crawford, Derrick Stafford, and Violet Palmer. I got 2 of the 3 right with just a short list of 7 potential officials (there were 27 officials still working at that point in time).
It doesn't matter to me that the MAVS weren't the 2006 NBA Champions b/c they shouldn't have gotten there in the first place. D-Whistle could've been Dirk Nowitski with the calls he was getting the the Spurs-Mavs series.
To me, the Mavs going down like that was sweet justice.
If you're a regular reader of the Sports Guy, you would know that he is often very critical of the officials. This isn't his first rant that the refs suck. I don't think his article has anything to do with the Celtics at all. What part of the article gave you that impression?
Amen to that. Spurs got screwed in that series. Dirk got breathed on and would get a call. Anytime the Spurs had momentum going, the refs would get whistle happy and call the Spurs for a foul ruining the momentum.
I think they should allow for one challenge per half. If the foul is overruled, the ball would be given back to the challenging team (or the correct call would be made, were it a foul situation). If the ruling stands, then the opposite team gets a technical free throw, maybe even two. This would keep teams from using it purposefully to stop momentum. If you're going to challenge a call, you better be damn sure you are correct, and it better be worth the chance to give up points.
Unfortunately, I don't think they'll ever put into play, for that very same reason. There are too many situations where teams could use it to just stop a break or kill momentum. Then again, any player or coach can just get a technical and do the same thing if they really want to (like last night when Van Gundy's technical kept a Williams trey off the board).
But Stern would NEVER want to question the credibility of his perfect refs.
No part of this article, but the fact he doesn't say when the Celtics get the benefit of the officials is what gives me that impression.
EXACLTY. the mavs fans conveniently forget this part. they whine about wade but ignore the fact that they got past us in the same exact way with their own D(irk)-Whistle.
There were some poorly officiated games in the Mavs/Spurs series, but imo the Mavs got royally screwed by the refs against the Heat.
Miami should have gotten more calls than the Mavs, but sometimes it was out of hand.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)