I'm not quite as pessimistic as you.Russia had a much larger area to cover, and didn't have a strong GDP backing it up IIRC.
I think we'll adjust and recover; it will just take awhile. It would help if we stopped getting into wars too.
A point to bring up is that the yuan is valuable BECAUSE it's undervalued deliberately. If China wasn't playing around with their yuan, then it would be less 'valuable' to other countries.
I'm not quite as pessimistic as you.Russia had a much larger area to cover, and didn't have a strong GDP backing it up IIRC.
I think we'll adjust and recover; it will just take awhile. It would help if we stopped getting into wars too.
Sure, but that doesn't mean that your nation or company has to work with the World Bank and IMF. You can still grow your nations economy internally, and avoid running up debt or reliance on foreign powers.
While true, what youre suggesting is taking the China route. That takes a looooong time. Some countries dont have the means or resources to last that long, especially South American countries that arent rich with natural resource.
You can only sell so much jungle.
I would say that if thats the case, chances are getting loans from the World Bank isn't the greatest idea. I'm not arguing that its not freaking hard to run a country debt free, I'm just saying thats the way nations should try. While harder in the short term, it will keep you from collapsing when the rest of the worlds economies do, leaving you to pick up the pieces, since you are the last one standing.
Right, but the Yuan's only value is with the Chinese. When your currency is artificially low, you can make goods for "less" cost, so to speak. Which keeps their GDP artificially lower because its Gross Domestic Product, that is, how much did all the your country makes sell for?
That the yuan is low in value deflates that number, but its a cheaper good in comparison so it sells wildly.
Now, one could argue that the adjustment in the yuan would create more compe ion in areas the Chinese make their money.
But IMO, that new price compe ion is unlikely to offset the HUGE gains they would make having to sell their products for an increased price/value while the cost associated to make them in a giant, isolated and independant country like China would remain the same. Factor in their hybrid government and their cost in labor and such would not nearly rise to the value of good sold. Such is the advantage of ultra-nationalistic people like the Asian world tends to be (Japan and China in particular).
Im no economist though. Ive stated that many times here, so Im listening.
While I admire your altruism, you and I both know the tendencies of human nature and more to the point, Western thinking.
Yeah, theres a reason why civilizations fall, and at the center of it, IMO, its the lack of drive by the individuals that make up that civilization. Once you are unwilling to work for your luxuries, things start to go down hill really fast.
Easy credit and prolonged, low interest debt are to America what Slave labor/population was to Rome.
And easy access to gold was to Spain. And cheap goods from colonies for the British Empire.
All China really has to do is to stop the shipments of fuel and food that prop their puppets up.
But, I do see the whacky little man in Pyongyang forcing the Chinese to step up to the plate at some point.
I think China and Russia both are secretly pushing N. Korea to challenge us so that we can reveal our missle interecepting capabilities. It makes alot of sense from Russia's pov.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)