No Shaq?
No Shaq?
At this point in his career?
No, but if your ask the casual fan, "who's a superstar in the NBA?", I'm sure a mass amount would include Shaq. The term superstar always seemed based on (and factored in) popularity as well as skill. I think it's just arguing semantics.
I think Wade is a superstar, when healthy. Duncan is no longer one.
How about we wait until we proclaim Roy as better than the player that had the best finals performance ever int he history of the NBA.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)