I have no clue, to be honest.
Many times these "contracts" are the best deal the manufacturers have to agree with. It's not like they can simply employ others to work in the plants who are not union because they are forced to hire union.
Now that GM is manufacturing outside of that realm in other countries...all of a sudden it's their fault because the union won't concede some of it's over burdoning economic demands?
From what I gather...Detroit's problem is with unemploymment. If the union were to concede many of the over burdoning demands it places on the manufacturers...unemployment issue solved.
Again...as pointed out earlier...
Also labor cost disparity comes from legacy pension and healthcare benefits to retired members... as well as ...unions have been accused of benefiting insider workers, those having secure jobs, at the cost of outsider workers, consumers of the goods or services produced, and the shareholders of the unionized business. Those who are likely to be disadvantaged most from unionization are the unemployed, those at risk of unemployment, or workers who are unable to get the job they want in a particular line of work.
I have no clue, to be honest.
I'm not familiar with the rest of the country but...could unemployment in those areas where unemployment is high be due to having to be in a union to secure a job?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)