red... dude I told you twice not to do that. Seriously, why would you even hit the edit button, it makes zero sense. That's the 3rd time.
Was a brutal week; I count I got 23, while chili and j-6 both got 21. I counted mikey with 26, 4cc with 21, and didn't see that piston had posted and gira had 24.
I was just fat, fingering tho, from everything I remember. Someone will need to check it closer, but that seems the general outcome.
Since we all know Boise shouldn't be counted in any championship outcome, I stopped at vander.
damn, usc game surprised me
No, we can't. Only reason I deleted his week 7 and week 8 predictions is because i KNOW he edited picks from week 7. If he wants to continue to "play for fun" he'd better not up again.
Yeah that's what blows goats (for quarters). I can't view what the original posts were.
That's why him editing the post a full one-and-a-half-turn of the earth later just leads us to believe he cheated.
10-4
LOL, like anyone here believes that... cheater.
LOL, like anyone believes utsa will beat tlu
It just defies reason that you would keep 'accidently' doing it if you weren't either:
a) cheating; or
b) a complete dumbass.
22-9dammit
Last edited by Dr Cox; 11-03-2009 at 12:03 PM. Reason: i suck at counting my record
c) a cheating dumbass
redraiderinkorea, I also notice how you put a W next to Texas-OSU when you picked OSU. I'm pretty sure Texas won that game.
yes and IMO, the poster in question should remain out of the compe ion for the remainder of the season.
The proper quote is "blows dogs for quarters."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
