Spurminatorland, like the United States of America, is not ruled by "Moral Law".Apparently there are no moral absolutes in Spurminatorland.
How is setting a hard timeline for termination any more perfect than, or even preferable to, allowing for the doctor's professional opinion?It's not perfect? Several million abortions a year, and it's not perfect? How many unnecessary deaths have resulted from that "imperfection?"
Not really. Besides, the Death Penalty argument involves one person's rights. The Abortion argument involves two.Please, tell me you don't oppose the death penalty on the basis it might result in innocents being put to death...that would be just too ironic.
What's ironic is that you seem to be making that argument yourself... Outlaw all abortions because we risk the possibility of terminating a fetus that could have survived outside the womb. Is that not your argument?
And if they choose not to abstain, and they conceive, they would be forced to keep the child in their womb until birth. Forced pregnancy.People have the choice to abstain -- except for the instance of rape, as I pointed out. Only rape resulting in conception is a "forced pregnancy." When that person makes an informed decision to engage in consensual sexual intercourse -- a practice widely (if not universally) known to result in pregnancy -- it's not forced.
What you propose, in essence, is to punish women for having sex.

Reply With Quote
Since when is my position okay with everyone else?
I figured a 20-something wrote that after seeing one too many porns and playing with himself.
X1billion
