Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 61 of 61
  1. #51
    Esse quam videri ploto's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    10,994
    Who and why they voted is an interesting study in people- that is all. Did it matter that the choice was either an African American man or a lesbian woman? Was there especially low turnout from the white suburban voter? Was there a higher turnout than normal in the Montrose area?

  2. #52
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    So, a victory for political apathy over prejudice
    if there were only 150k voters for a mayoral race in a city of millions, then that's apparently the case.

  3. #53
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Generally, the impression I've gotten is that most people were tired of the ing campaign. It's been going on for most of the late summer and fall, nonstop.

    While there were some random instances of Parker's sexual life being made an issue, most people seemed to not care or it was viewed as more of a novelty than anything else. Houston is a city more focused on making that dollar than anything else. This isn't dildo up the ass bag Dallas.

    As for the runoff, the sense seemed to be that both candidates' actual political philosophy and their true patrons were the same. Both were establishment candidates. If anything, Parker's support was a little more corporate. I think that, and apathy due to the long campaign is what contributed to the low turnout for the runoff.

    Of interest to me was that Parker did at least try to seem more libertine than anything else and made an effort to court conservatives, at least fiscal ones. Of course, most politicians are anything but in both areas.

  4. #54
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,868
    Of interest to me was that Parker did at least try to seem more libertine than anything else and made an effort to court conservatives, at least fiscal ones.
    Is that the word you meant, MarcusB?

  5. #55
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    Is that the word you meant, MarcusB?
    I laughed.

  6. #56
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    In the sense of not playing iden y politics. I guess an occurrence like her election wrecks the minds on both sides of the binary liberal v conservative, blue v red, screedfest, but frankly it wasn't that surprising.

  7. #57
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    if there were only 150k voters for a mayoral race in a city of millions, then that's apparently the case.
    I'm pretty sure only 40k voted in Austin's last mayoral race. Most people still think Will Wynn is in office.

  8. #58
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    I can't imagine more than 100k showing up for SA's last mayoral election....probably around 50k too....

    now that I think about it.....I do slightly wonder how many of the 150k voters in Houston were from Osteen's church

  9. #59
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,868
    In the sense of not playing iden y politics.
    An oblique usage of libertine? My own impression of it was made of much courser stuff, I must confess.

  10. #60
    If you can't slam with the best then jam with the rest sabar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,628
    What is a "major city"?

    I'd say the top 50 most populous cities in the U.S. are all quite influential. There are also a ton of cities than have a low population but a lot of high-rises and economic influence.

    the first openly gay person elected mayor of a major U.S. city
    Vague reporting on purpose I'd guess. It isn't the first, so why is it noteworthy? I mean, as long as it isn't a town of 148 people or something.

    In either case, this isn't that surprising. Voter turnout falls as the government becomes more local. The general feelings of the population are harder to reflect with less people, since each persons vote means more. Cities with more than a million people may only get 1000-2000 votes for smaller elected positions!

    Massive voter apathy can probably explain nearly every election with strange results.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •