Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 54 of 54
  1. #51
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    Ofcourse. That's how good teams do it, and that's how we won our championships. Bruce Bowen had low scoring nights out there, but he still found ways to affect the game defensively. Eventually, it becomes psychological. You don't worry that much about missing a shot, because you know you can get it back at the other end. But when you don't have that safety net, you put a lot more pressure on your offense.



    Bogans only played 10 minutes tonight. He played alongside Duncan, Jefferson and Parker. If Mason would have played those extra 10 minutes, we would have been exactly on the same hole, because when Duncan, Jefferson and Parker are out there, they take the shots. It matters very little wether Bogans sucks on offense or not. We already have other players working the bulk of the offense. We need complementary players than play defense with them.

    Your 'swap Mason for RJ' is a different story altogether, but one that I already addressed in another post. It's RJ that's going to be in crunch time with TD, TP and Manu out there, not Mason. So he's going to have to learn to play with them.
    This is always under the premise that the coaching staff believes that Jefferson is a better player overall than Mason, which I think they do.
    Duncan, Jefferson, and Parker don't have to "take all the shots". Who the ever said that? Is that a rule written somewhere?

    Let's review.

    1. Tony Parker is trying to pass the ball more and become a more complete point guard. Therefore, he needs guys who can get their shots off and finish baskets, something Roger does well.

    2. It's becoming apparent that Jefferson is not that useful in a half court setting. He thrived in a run and gun type offense with a guy like Jason Kidd leading the charge, but let's face it, Parker is no Jason Kidd. Roger likes to run and gun and will help Jefferson in that area too.

    3. The first unit is missing a 3 pt specialist/threat. Bogans is mediocre at best. Duncan will get more spacing from sagging defenders with Roger.

    I would easily bet $1000 that the spurs would have scored more than 17 in that 1st quarter with Roger starting.

  2. #52
    Good to Great hsxvvd's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,427
    Manu needs to start.

    the head games, the 5 best players need to start the game and finish the game.

    We don't have the luxury of bringing manu of the bench anymore, we simply don't have the same level of talent we once did.

  3. #53
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Duncan, Jefferson, and Parker don't have to "take all the shots". Who the ever said that? Is that a rule written somewhere?
    Let me see, your best players taking the most shots... Hmm, I wonder if that makes any sense... I mean, you really need a rule spelling out common sense?


  4. #54
    Believe. BatManu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    33
    Spurs of the Moment was saying to start Roger Mason too, but I don't know how much difference it would make. If he goes back to shooting like crap do you keep changing the lineup? Then again, Bogans is really sucking it up right now.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •