Props to Steve Nash, the best PG of his generation.

[DUNCANownsKOBE2]

CP3 is an assist , not a great passer. There's a difference.

[redzero]

Chris Paul should let other great playmakers on his team like Peja and D-West make some decisions some times.

[Pelicans78]

CP3 is an assist , not a great passer. There's a difference.

Maybe we oughta run the offense through Okafor.

[21_Blessings]

You're a ing idiot.

Copy paste some more Bill Simmons dude. It's all you're good for.

Magic is the better player, yes.

Not only was a Magic a better basketball player than Steve Nash, he was an infinitely better POINT GUARD. I gave you reasons above. Steve Nash doesn't come close to the overall PG skills Magic brought. The only thing he has on Magic is shooting. That's it. If you think SKILL is predominately shooting based then you're nothing but a fat ing shut-in that has never touched a basketball in his life.

But what made him better was not a matter of skills, but his size advantages.

Haha. Look how dumb you are. His size advantages allowed him to play every position on the floor. His skill as a PG is a different story entirely. If you actually watched Magic play and not just stream some random youtube clips you would realize that. Instead you're just a flaming got that has a hard-on for Nash.

But in terms of pure skills, Steve Nash is arguably the most SKILLED player in the NBA, the only other person in the discussion being Kobe.

Nash isn't even in the discussion with Kobe. You're delusional.

He doesn't have the physical and athletic advantages that other guys have, but he's definitely as skilled of a player as the NBA has ever seen.

Nash is one of the best shooters ever. That's it. He's definitely extremely skilled but his skill has been trumped by much better NBA players over the course of its history.

And to think that he would not be able to have a post game if he had Magic's size is ing re ed, as Nash has some of the best footwork any player in NBA history has ever had. I'm sure he would have no problem with a post game if he had a few extra inches of height.

Magic developing a sky hook doesn't have anything to do with size. Nash could post up guys like Fisher and Farmar if he actually had a post game. Which Steve Nash doesn't. You can't be in the argument for best footwork ever and not have any resemblance of a post game. Sorry. Saying Nash has the best footwork in history has no basis in reality. Shut the up.

Just because his white ass grew up playing soccer doesn't equate to BEST FOOTWORK EVER.

If all it took to be Magic was size than we would have seen another one by now. Which we haven't. Nash is in the same category as Mark Price. Still can't even hold Stockton or Isiah's jock though. Nash's game is completely system dependent. He needs an all offense no defense gimmick system to flourish and that doesn't win in the NBA playoffs.

But you're too ing stupid to understand that skill and size are two completely different things.

You're too ing stupid to understand what kind of a player Magic was. You're just ignorant. Even mentioning Nash in the same breath as Magic is laughable. Saying he was more skilled and Magic was only better due to size is certifiably crazy.

[21_Blessings]

No.

Yes. Nash has never been out of the WCF for a reason. That's despite playing on teams full of talent most of his career.