Reply With Quote
shes pretty hot but the way she s her head to the side and has that reptilian look on her face gets kind of old after awhile. im more of a fan of women who get hotter and hotter the longer you look at them.
Yeah, something is fishy here. Is she hot? Yeah. Is she so hot that she should talk about how hot she is all the time? No. WTF, she's talked more about how she hot she is in one article than Salma Hayek has in her whole lifetime.
Oh, and the first half of that news article almost reads like something out of The Onion.
shes pretty hot but the way she s her head to the side and has that reptilian look on her face gets kind of old after awhile. im more of a fan of women who get hotter and hotter the longer you look at them.
Or get hotter the longer you are drinking and go from a 6 to a 10 right before your eyes.
I am glad they don't keep the chicks at wells from dressing like that
Concur whole story is not being told by either side.
Her liarwyer seems faily skeevy too, trying too hard to spin in his clients favor like most.
Howard Stern must be all over her.
Her lawyer probably wants to bang her.
Think he's representing her pro-boner?
Nice s she has
if she is wearing the same 'approved' attire as other employees, they cannot single her out.
if her manager had a problem with the distracting nature of her figure in the approved attire, then HE should have gone to human resources to review the dress code and implement whatever adjustments needed in the language so that she would have to wear less form fitting clothing, yet a dress code that would be equal for all.
simply put. something to the effect of:
"Employees attire must convey a professional appearance at all times, however skin tight or extremely form fitting attire is prohibited."
i'm reading a citibank dress code (granted not specific to her position it seems) but it is frankly, too vague for her manager to have just cause for termination over her clothing.
link to pdf
if they cannot show just cause for her termination attributed to her work performance, and if the dress code at her bank is/was as general as the one above.
then she should win and get her settlement.
case closed.
HOWEVER, she should not have shared that story about showing up with no makeup and her hair disheveled. unless i'm mistaken, her managers comments to her had nothing to do with her makeup or hair, but her form fitting attire.
she chose to respond to his request in an unprofessional way. if that story is one of many instances when she acted unprofessional, and citibank can prove it with do ented evidence, then the tables turn and she's sol.
what i find humorous is the fact that there may be many a citibank manager out there, and more importantly to their business, many male customers, that were enjoying the tight fitting clothing in other branches, and are now gonna be in for a rude awakening when the policy is updated to prohibit such, if it hasn't been already...
she should have listened to her current employer's advice and kept quiet.
she wants the attention and it might cost her.
if she wanted justice she would be preaching about what a good job performance record she has, and how she earned it with her work and not her body.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
