If the Spurs re-sign Parker...?

[admiralsnackbar]

To be honest I am not very impressed with most of the other FOs.

I expect the feeling might be mutual if they happened upon this thread. I mean how could they live with themselves knowing you see right through their flimsy designs? Now everybody will know their dark secret: they jock ex-Spurs just to touch the hem of the greatest organization in all sports' garment.

As for Hill... the guy's play is worth more than his current salary and Bonner's combined, so you're looking at slim slim pickings as far as getting a player of equal talent back -- from a losing team or otherwise.

[Bito Corleone]

Has anyone else noticed that the OP has yet to mention even one single name that he would like to get back in exchange for Hill? At least give some options of players you would like to get in return rather than just blindly saying you want to trade him if Tony stays around.

There really should be some sort of filter not allowing people to start new threads until they get to 1000 posts, or at least 500...and I feel this way even knowing that I have fewer than 100 posts currently.

[Strike]

If the spurs end up resigning Tony Parker this year, do you think that the spurs should trade George Hill? Are you for a trade yes/no and why/why not. If you are for the trade of hill what position would you want to upgrade.

I think we should trade him if we resign Parker. I would want to trade him because I am not a fan of playing tony and hill at the same time. Teams that play a small pg and sg just do not win. Just playing hill at the pg will not allow him very many minutes and that would just be a waste of talent. By trading him we can then upgrade talent of other positions. Also temple seems to have the potential to be a solid back-up pg.

[Josepatches_]

I just want the spurs to do everything we can to win a ring with timmy. I do not want to wait. I think you settling for mediocrity.

Sign James,Wade,KB or someone like them.Otherwise we aren't going to win more rings with Timmy. Mediocrity??? We can't be a contender forever.

[Blake]

So your telling me that the team is basically the same with hill on the court as they are with manu on the court. I guess hill is basically as good as manu. Thanks for letting me know, we should be a lock for the finals now.

No, since you made it a point that you do not want to see Parker and Hill playing together, I was telling you that Parker and Hill together on the court is not that far off statistically than Parker and Manu.

Just a thought, could it be that statistics are overrated and deceiving. Hopefully now you have come to that realization.

They could be if you don't like what they allude to and they don't jive with your argument.

I quickly came to the realization that you are an idiot. I'm just playing along for fun.

[Blake]

Who in their right mind would want to trade away Hill for a player that is making the same money and will most definitely not be as good a player?

Nathan89

[Blake]

Take a look at your poll results before you keep trying to justify trading him.

He probably won't. He thinks stats can be overrated and deceiving.