Duncan's Spurs ***** on Bean's Legacy and others.

[ezau]

great ing 13 straight playoffs years

[Man In Black]

great ing 13 straight playoffs years

But of course if Bean did that, then it'd be better than Bean Burritos


See...it's easy to irk you lickers. All any of us has to do, is reference that Bean either cannot, or has not done. The way you guys post here is full genuflection to things Spurs related. I find it amusing that you have to type the word Spurs daily just to even get here. Knowing that there are plenty of LAL boards out there, you'd think you'd just try to be relevant there but that's not the case.

So you come here in hopes of felching ejaculi from one of the other LAL bandwagon brethren. And you get it, and then you lap it all up. It's as if you are all saying..."It's so cool to be VIRTUALLY appreciated by my fellow lickers."

ACTUAL Reality...you are still who you are, and all this internet cred won't finance your vacation to Downtown Skid Row.



I didn't write that Duncan has done something that no other basketball great has ever done. Slam Magazine did, I just made sure to reference it.

Sincerely,

The Man In Black

[Ashy Larry]

lol @ regular season wins .... if they were so damn important, the Mavs would have a load of banners ......

you're better than that Spursfan.

[BadOdor]

tbh I'm not surprised spur fan pulls out this card, some of the GNSF think that making the finals is the same as getting swept in the first round.

[midnightpulp]

tbh I'm not surprised spur fan pulls out this card, some of the GNSF think that making the finals is the same as getting swept in the first round.

Also something to consider is that regular season wins, just like championships, are team accomplishments.

And I'm not one of those Spur fans who automatically grant Duncan as the best PF of all time just because he has 4 rings to Malone's zero. I consider Duncan the greatest PF of all-time because his FG% didn't drop from 50+% in the regular to 46% in the post-season, like Malone. Also, Duncan is a better rebounder, playmaker, and defender than Malone. On an individual level, Duncan does virtually everything better than Malone except score and impregnate 13 year old girls.

When comparing two players, you should evaluate them individually, and not always resort to the rings argument.

[ezau]

Kobe, is at best, the fourth best SG to play the game. Just saying

[midnightpulp]

Kobe, is at best, the fourth best SG to play the game. Just saying

Jerry West was just as dominant a SG in his era as Kobe, or even Jordan, is in his.

Of course, Kobe or Jordan would destroy him on the court in today's game (the 6'2" West would be physically over-matched), but that's not really fair to West. I think you should evaluate players based on what they achieved in their own era.

[BadOdor]

Also something to consider is that regular season wins, just like championships, are team accomplishments.

And I'm not one of those Spur fans who automatically grant Duncan as the best PF of all time just because he has 4 rings to Malone's zero. I consider Duncan the greatest PF of all-time because his FG% didn't drop from 50+% in the regular to 46% in the post-season, like Malone. Also, Duncan is a better rebounder, playmaker, and defender than Malone. On an individual level, Duncan does virtually everything better than Malone except score and impregnate 13 year old girls.

When comparing two players, you should evaluate them individually, and not always resort to the rings argument.

Ok. How is that relevant to my post?

[midnightpulp]

Ok. How is that relevant to my post?

I'm elaborating on your point of how it's meaningless to cite 50 wins seasons as some kind of personal accomplishment, which MiB attempted to do in this thread.

Thought you Jews knew how to read between the lines? (I kid, I kid)

[LkrFan]

Kobe has been in the league for 14 years
TD has been in the league for 13 years
Kobe has played in 7 Finals
TD has played in 4 Finals
Kobe has been in the Finals for 50% of his career (even MJ can't say that)
TD has been in the Finals for 30.7% of his career (28.5% after this year )
Kobe has 5 rings
TD has 3.5* rings
Kobe's team still has a 3-4 year championship window
TD's team, has, well
Kobe won 5 rings during the TD era of 13 straight 50-win seasons
Kobe has a legit chance to have 7 or 8 rings by the time he is done

Kobe is the winner by TKO

[SanAntonioSpurs23]

Kobe has been in the league for 14 years
TD has been in the league for 13 years
Kobe has played in 7 Finals
TD has played in 4 Finals
Kobe has been in the Finals for 50% of his career (even MJ can't say that)
TD has been in the Finals for 30.7% of his career (28.5% after this year )
Kobe has 5 rings
TD has 3.5* rings
Kobe's team still has a 3-4 year championship window
TD's team, has, well
Kobe won 5 rings during the TD era of 13 straight 50-win seasons
Kobe has a legit chance to have 7 or 8 rings by the time he is done

Kobe is the winner by TKO

You're right, Duncan has 3.5 rings and Kobe has 2. Last time I checked 3.5>>>>>2. Anyway your forgot to mention TD nor Jordan ever lost in any of their finals appearances, what about Kobe?

[LkrFan]

You're right, Duncan has 3.5 rings and Kobe has 2. Last time I checked 3.5>>>>>2. Anyway your forgot to mention TD nor Jordan ever lost in any of their finals appearances, what about Kobe?

So much butthurtness in this post.

[Jose Canseco]

For the record, Tim Duncan didn't lead his team to 13 consecutive 50+ win seasons because the 1998-99 regular season was only 50 games long and the Spurs didn't go undefeated in that strike shortened season. They were 37-13. So Tim Duncan didn't accomplish 13 consecutive 50+ win seasons either.

And even if you want to count those 37 wins as equivalent to 50+ wins for a shortened season, then Tim Duncan isn't the only one to accomplish the feat either. Shaquille O'Neal had 13 consecutive seasons of 50+ wins if you count the Lakers 1998-99 31 wins as equivalent to 50-51 wins (which is what the winning percentage over 82 game would be).

So ummmm yeah, Tim Duncan didn't have 13 consecutive 50+ win seasons. And even if you want to skew reality and change the 1998-99 season, then Shaq did it too.

Sakit sa puwet.

[Daddy_Of_All_Trolls]

Lakers and Spurs. The NBA's two best franchises for 12 seasons. They or their players didn't on each other, they on the rest of the league.

/thread

[TheMACHINE]

Sakit sa puwet.

[Man In Black]

Kobe has been in the league for 14 years
TD has been in the league for 13 years
Kobe has played in 7 Finals
TD has played in 4 Finals
Kobe has been in the Finals for 50% of his career (even MJ can't say that)
TD has been in the Finals for 30.7% of his career (28.5% after this year )
Kobe has 5 rings
TD has 3.5* rings
Kobe's team still has a 3-4 year championship window
TD's team, has, well
Kobe won 5 rings during the TD era of 13 straight 50-win seasons
Kobe has a legit chance to have 7 or 8 rings by the time he is done

Kobe is the winner by TKO

Hey...can you add the ALL-NBA and ALL-NBA D team accomplishments as well. If you're going to report, you might as well do it accurately.

And even if you want to count those 37 wins as equivalent to 50+ wins for a shortened season, then Tim Duncan isn't the only one to accomplish the feat either. Shaquille O'Neal had 13 consecutive seasons of 50+ wins if you count the Lakers 1998-99 31 wins as equivalent to 50-51 wins (which is what the winning percentage over 82 game would be).

Oh and even if they didn't play the full season that year(IT was the league that did it, not the players) it still amounted to a better than .610 winning percentage. And in a full season... .610 amounts to 50 games won. For the record, they finished with a .740 winning percentage. And as for Shaq, it wasn't all on 1 team. He's now a pirate for hire and has been since he left Miami. That's why he's not included among Russell's Celtics or Magic's Lakers.

OBTW - it's a discussion and why the internet gives people this kind of high must mean...they're overly compensating for something.

Hindi na sakit nung puwet ko.

[Giuseppe]

13 years, eh, MIB?

[Man In Black]

13 years, eh, MIB?

http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba...10-11-preview/

You can read can't you?

[Jose Canseco]

Oh and even if they didn't play the full season that year(IT was the league that did it, not the players) it still amounted to a better than .610 winning percentage. And in a full season... .610 amounts to 50 games won. For the record, they finished with a .740 winning percentage. And as for Shaq, it wasn't all on 1 team. He's now a pirate for hire and has been since he left Miami. That's why he's not included among Russell's Celtics or Magic's Lakers.

And where exactly did you say that the accomplishment only counted if it was for the same team?

Here, I'll give you your first posts in this thread...

Well, technically...Bean ain't even come close to sniffing 13 straight years of playoff ball. In essence, he failed and then cried and then badmouthed Bynum, and then threatened to leave, and then greatly benefited from heisting Heisley.

13 straight 50+ win seasons-Only been accomplished by Tim Duncan.

But, really...you went to the ring argument because Bean can't say that he's LED his team to 50+ wins 13 straight seasons. Did he or did he not?

No one has. No one but Tim Duncan

So now you're changing the accomplishment realizing you were actually wrong about your first contention? Good one, bro.

OBTW - it's a discussion and why the internet gives people this kind of high must mean...they're overly compensating for something.

Hindi na sakit nung puwet ko.

Kind of got that same feeling reading this thread you made. Why someone needed to validate Tim Duncan with this thread screams insecurity and butthurtness. Maybe purchase a pump for your lumpia.

Pambahira ka naman. Hindi sakit lang. Nadudugo ang puwet mo, bro. Get a band-aid or something.

[Sisk]

does this 13 straight years include the year Tony Parker got the Finals MVP?

do the 5 rings kobe has include the 3 rings shaq won?

[history2b]

HOOOOORAAAY FOR 50 game win seasons >>>>>>>>>> CHAMPIONSHIPS!!!

[Man In Black]

Jose...If I wanted to talk the native language, I'd be in the Arnel Pineda Forum or the Phil Boxing one.

You can read the link to the article. 13 seasons of .610 or better/translates to 50 wins. All with one team. Hence the Russell and Magic statement.

If anything...there is nothing that suggests, at all, that Duncan's Spurs would not have one 50 if that one season was played the full 82. Besides...aren't you a Pistons fan?

[Sisk]

Whiteboy...

[ezau]

Kobe has been in the league for 14 years
TD has been in the league for 13 years
Kobe has played in 7 Finals
TD has played in 4 Finals
Kobe has been in the Finals for 50% of his career (even MJ can't say that)
TD has been in the Finals for 30.7% of his career (28.5% after this year )
Kobe has 2 rings as the lead guy
TD has 3.5* rings as the lead guy
Kobe's team still has a 3-4 year championship window
TD's team, has, well
Kobe won 5 rings during the TD era of 13 straight 50-win seasons
Kobe has a legit chance to have 7 or 8 rings by the time he is done

3.5> 2

[Leonard Curse]

hers to timmy getting his 5th le!!!! if he's a true champion (which he is), he doesnt need to cry and bash his team to obtain allstar players. duncan/pop dont pout instead they turn a 57th argentian pick and a 28th pick from france into allstars! next is the 37th pick blair or 26thpick hill.

you see we dont secretly buy lottery picks like es. Timmy will just take matter into his own hands with a strong team behind him & hopefully we saw a glimpse of whats to come for mr bryant. afterall everyone knows who truly leads the lakers to rings..